http://www.ptypes.com/temperament_test.html
Has anyone tried this temperament test?
http://www.ptypes.com/temperaments.htmlTemperament Score
Idealist 14
Rationalist 2
Traditionalist 7
Hedonist 7
Your temperament type is Idealist.
http://www.ptypes.com/temperament_test.html
Has anyone tried this temperament test?
http://www.ptypes.com/temperaments.htmlTemperament Score
Idealist 14
Rationalist 2
Traditionalist 7
Hedonist 7
Your temperament type is Idealist.
INTp
sx/sp
Temperament Score
Idealist 9
Rationalist 13
Traditionalist 2
Hedonist 6
Your temperament type is Rationalist.
These are Keirsey's "temperaments," by the way -- NF, NT, SJ, SP.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
Yup.Originally Posted by Expat
And according to Keirsey,
NF - Idealist
NT - Rationalist
SJ - Traditionalist
SP - Hedonists
Idealist
Members:
o INFJ
o INFP
o ENFP
o ENFJRationalist
Members:
o INTP
o INTJ
o ENTP
o ENTJTraditionalist
Members:
o ESFJ
o ESTJ
o ISFJ
o ISTJYea, the above is from the16types.infoHedonist
Members:
o ISTP
o ISFP
o ESFP
o ESTP
INTp
sx/sp
I got Idealist too, but Hedonist was a close second. I think it's because they included questions that were more like dual-seeking questions. (I feel best when . . . , and I most want . . . ).
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Hmm, yea. I had trouble answering those questions.Originally Posted by Slacker Mom
But I kinda thought which was more me, instead of what I wanted, something like that.
INTp
sx/sp
Temperament Score
Idealist 17
Rationalist 4
Traditionalist 6
Hedonist 3
Your temperament type is Idealist.
Idealist 4
Rationalist 11
Traditionalist 0
Hedonist 15
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Temperament Score
Idealist 9
Rationalist 10
Traditionalist 2
Hedonist 9
Your temperament type is Rationalist.
pretty close scores, but i liked the way you didn't know what you were answering.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
Idealist 9
Rationalist 14
Traditionalist 4
Hedonist 3
Your temperament type is Rationalist.
this test was completely pointless
Idealist 6
Rationalist 14
Traditionalist 7
Hedonist 3
Your temperament type is Rationalist.
Temperament Score
Idealist 10
Rationalist 14
Traditionalist 4
Hedonist 2
Your temperament type is Rationalist.
All Hail The Flying Spaghetti Monster
Temperament Score
Idealist 9
Rationalist 14
Traditionalist 4
Hedonist 3
I have tested a handful of real life persons with Keirsey's own Temperament Sorter, and it has given the correct group every time. This test is slightly different, but considering the results so far it might be equally accurate.Originally Posted by niffweed17
A test of this kind is extremely useful as a complementary typing tool. It can help when you're in doubt between two types from different "temperament" groups, for example ISTj and ISTp, or ENFp and ENTp.
Temperament Score
Idealist 6
Rationalist 6
Traditionalist 8
Hedonist 10
Your temperament type is Hedonist.
I'm pretty stoned so that probably nneeds to be taken into account I seem to get very ISFp when I'm baked so I don't argue with this....
Temperament Score
Idealist 4
Rationalist 14
Traditionalist 4
Hedonist 8
Your temperament type is Rationalist.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."
--Theodore Roosevelt
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
-- Mark Twain
"Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in."
-- Confucius
Temperament Score
Idealist 8
Rationalist 12
Traditionalist 3
Hedonist 7
Your temperament type is Rationalist.
Oh well...I always did test as a thinker.
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
Interesting result. Have you ever tried Keirsey's Temperament Sorter? If you have answered honestly and have a more or less correct picture of yourself, I would say that you are probably not an ENFj.Originally Posted by Kristiina
If you always test as a thinker, you probably are a thinker. The only other explanation possible is that you have an incorrect self-image. And if you have that, you cannot be sure that you are an ENFj either.
Boy stop with those basless absolute affirmations like you are the trinity or something and get real.Originally Posted by Phaedrus
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I have to agree with FDG, Phaedrus.
Kristiina has always tested as xNTx or at least xxTx in most usual tests. Her type has been discussed as much as anyone else's. She thoroughly identifies with, and understands, ENFj-ness. Her Reinin dichotomies all point cleartly towards Beta NF and she has consistently identified with, and displayed, an EJ temperament.
I'd say that a little more evidence would be necessary than a test such as this one to suggest that she isn't ENFj.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
Temperament Score
Idealist 8
Rationalist 11
Traditionalist 7
Hedonist 4
Your temperament type is Rationalist.
Though I almost always test as a rationalist I identify the most with the hedonist temperament.
And the only possible explanation for that is, as I have already said, that either she has an incorrect picture of herself or that she is not an ENFj.Originally Posted by Expat
Well, that seems to point clearly towards the first option -- that she has an incorrect self-image. She cannot identify with ENFj-ness and Beta NF and at the same time identify more with a lot of T traits (which she inevitably does if she conistently and repeatedly test as a T type). So, her picture of herself seems to be incoherent. And an incoherent self-image should be changed so that it is no longer incoherent -- that is my main point here.Originally Posted by Expat
You have already agreed that there is more evidence than this test result. To test as a T type in every test is very strong evidence -- unless you have an incorrect picture of your own personality ...Originally Posted by Expat
Phaedrus may come off as arrogant, but that doesn't mean he's wrong.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
yay. People talking about me. I still think I'm closer to ENFj than ENTj, but once again I stumbled upon a way to show people I wasn't delirious - I did have credible reason to think I was ENTj. This testing as thinking was one of the reasons. ENTj made a lot of sense, only some nuances didn't match.
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
It is not a logic consequence, but in this case he is (like, most of the time).Originally Posted by Traveler
Because he is attaching the entire type only to an anchor (the testing) which is not the most connected to the real-world.
People can have the self-image their prefer, whether it is incoherent, or not. Not up to him to tell people what to do with their self, image, little idiotic punk.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Well, I think his intentions were good, which was to question the belief of her type. He was questioning Kristina's self awareness, which may be linked to awareness of type. However, your right that he should of just provided an adequate argument to why she isn't ENFJ rather than attack her self-awareness.Originally Posted by FDG
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
His intentions might be always good, but by being an asshole with his knowledge he will only get smashed under other people's boots IRL.Originally Posted by Traveler
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Yes, you do have a point.Originally Posted by Phaedrus
This would be explained by the ENFj inclination to identify strongly with the role they have decided to identify with. If true, that would make ENFj the most difficult type to spot of all.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
You are absolutely wrong. I too always test as a NT type in MBTI, or more precisely xNTP, but I'm definitely an IEI. Before you start attacking my self perception, my self perceptions had absolutely nothing to do with me picking/determining my type, I based my type exclusively on intertype relations I have.Originally Posted by Phaedrus
The fact is that I am an innovative thinker and a rational person does not excuse me from being IEI no matter how much incomprehensible that might seem to you. The same goes for kristiina.
Okay, however if he had said: "I don't think your ENFJ and this is why" then that would be acceptable. Rather than saying: "I think your incapable of typing yourself" which would be unacceptable. Do you agree?Originally Posted by FDG
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Yes of course it would, but that's not what he said, damn. IMHO, He should be impaled and the blood used as a condiment for orgies between more honorable people, but that's just my opinion (the last sentence being the saver of everything I said before )
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Double Post.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Self perception does have something to do with determining your type, however basing it on inter-type relations helps reinforce it and accept it. Basically, you need to have a general idea of how you behave to think of probable types, and then using interactions with other people to seal the deal. Both of these are necessary steps in my opinion among many others.Originally Posted by snegledmaca
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Wrong conclusion, that only means that they would be the most difficult to spot if they wrote something about themselves. Inborn automatic behavoiur has nothing to do with their altered self perception and if I understand correctly it's inborn automatic behavoiur that is a manifestations of ones type and not people's self perceptions. Those would be environmental if anything.Originally Posted by Expat
Self perception deals with recognizing inborn automatic behavior.Originally Posted by snegledmaca
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
I agree that you need knowledge of the theory to determine type, it's pretty pointless to discuss the theory and its parts if you have no knowledge of it, but self perception is nothing more then your opinion. If you want to find your type you will base it on concrete, unchangeable, unbiased stuff like a relationship you're hade for 10 years, or the habits you've had since childhood.Originally Posted by Traveler
Self perception is nothing more then an opinion. Also self perception includes an explanation of the observations you've made on yourself.Originally Posted by Traveler
Yeah, I agree that self perception is your opinion. Though, ironically the accuracy depends on how self-aware the person is. Though you do have a point because self-perception can only take you so far and you do need those examples you stated. Your relations with other people are the primary way to define who you are confidently because they will either refute or correspond to your self perception.Originally Posted by snegledmaca
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5