Stirlitz - Huxley (Filatov)
It all started when I wanted to celebrate the New Year with my grandmother, but her parents would not leave me alone – I had just turned 12 years old. So I went with my aunt, whom I simply called Natasha, despite the fact that she was almost 20 years older than I was. On the train to Barnaul, which was a 5-hour drive away, but they flew to me quite quickly.
It is with such interest and admiration she listened to my stories, arguments, logical construction; it just inspired me. Natasha also told many stories about herself, her friends, with whom she went on camping trips, the hikes themselves. For me it was very interesting, since I myself love to travel.
That New Year's flying for me is very fast and fun (as well as for Natasha, in her own words). I seem to get a charge of energy, and since I spend every New Year's Eve in Barnaul with Natasha, and within a year I try as often as possible go and see her. If we do not see each other for a long time, then we begin to call each other and find out who of us have been able to attend. For now we just need the first life - the opportunity to sit together and talk. When Natasha arrives, I will immediately save all the work, even if I have an exam tomorrow, because from communication with her I get so much pleasure and such an amount of energy that the following night sitting at my books is easy, without fatigue. And on holidays we can sit together day and night. True, in the end it's me tired - as I used to sleep at night, and Natasha slept more in the morning, and in general can cost three to four hours of sleep per night.
When we go to the cottage, she will oversleep, then there will be a long time to assemble, and finally she says: "Let's go to the next train!" I certainly do not feel like waiting another two hours, I start to rush, we run to the station, and she wonders why I need to keep up with this train. But I have a plan that is hard for me to alter.
When I go on holiday I always tidy rooms, decorate them. If you got some sort of a thing, for example, old toys, I'll fix it and put somewhere, and Natasha walks and wonders that I have all things in their place, she says she would never have guessed to do so ...
But Natasha will I comfort of mind. And it is, moreover, well versed in the causes of human actions. I can only say that someone did this somehow. She can immediately feel and explain why the man did so, but I still think: "Lord, how I had not guessed?"
Clearly, in the example above, the relationship of activation is perceived by both partners as highly favorable - mostly because everyone gets a strong function of the other that is the support that is essential. Against this backdrop, some discomfort due to the difference of the functions 1-channel is perceived as annoying, but easily avoidable worldly noise, not so important, and it is quite forgivable...But this is not always the case.
Here is a small example of the relations of the same psychotypes when this discomfort, despite the mutual goodwill of partners, is seen not so rosy:
My dad is a psychotype LSE, and I belong to the psychotype IEE. When I ask him to explain something to me he does so very lucidly and clearly, but when we need to do something together, I just cannot wait until he finally finishes his part. Especially hard for me is that when he says something: before he tells the very story he introduces in detail the actors, while also tells about their relatives up to third degree, then more background - and he really does not like being interrupted or asked to omit unnecessary details.
If he does for me any purchase, the thing always appears to be very suitable. But I do not like to go with him to shop - too meticulous and detailed - it all out there to learn ...
If he had something planned, it is very difficult to adjust, even if the conditions are not changed dramatically in his favor. As we were going to march to the Altai, but learned that this season there was very bad weather. We then had the opportunity to go to Alma-Ata, instead of Altai, but once the father decided to go to the Altai ... there we mokli two weeks.
In this example, the relationship is, of course, respectful and friendly, but my father, LSE, is obviously too accentuated by his strong features. By virtue of their inertia, he is now and then "stuck" on it, and it turns out that any of his pre-planned decisions have a lot more power than the circumstances themselves! And here, whether he wants to or not, his strong function begins to be a source of discomfort to people close to him, in this situation only by their understanding and love can help avoid a direct conflict.
In industrial relations the same sphere of activation can be very beneficial - again, provided the individual's psycho meets his old activities. The same IEE as a provider of scientific ideas and LSE as their active developer would have amounted to a great couple.
Originally Posted by Cyclops
If he's got annoyed it must be a regular occurance. It's not like an ISTp to be that obssesed with time, unless your really taking the biscuit. I have known SLI since i was 5 and LSE since about 7. My core friend group just fit socionics like a glove, im very confident about them all. One problem with me is i dont flesh out my ideas / what i mean. I dont actually argue a lot at all with him but there is occasions. Tonight i said im not sure that teachers in our state should get the same wages as teachers in another state because cost of living in the other state is higher. He disagreed as he said that there is an exodus of people from our state because of the lower wages. A small discussion ensued but in the end we both just agreed we dont really know much about it and we were both right to some degree. I dont actually think i have EVER had a heated argument with him, and that is saying something. I agree disagreeing with mirror seems much more common than activity. Its normally on an area of politics or something like that.
Reply With Quote
)
. Maybe that movie wasn't really original, and it was the "same old" type where just at the last minute the hero wins, blah blah.
How was he in bed?
subtype.
Truth is always stranger than fiction.
i think it's interesting to read fresh things from russian sources but if they are universally regarded as suckage, maybe its pointless?
