http://socionics.wsphere.com/cgi-bin...632860931.html
what a mess. i'm less sure of my type than i was before!
http://socionics.wsphere.com/cgi-bin...632860931.html
what a mess. i'm less sure of my type than i was before!
ROFLMAO... you're EVERY type!
You are INTj or ENTp ... you can not be INTp, because you do not have any ...
I really should make it more clear how to read this test or a FAQ or something.
By the way, the type in big blue lettering does not always switch right with the J and P ... it really says you are INTx, and I should make that clear somewhere ...
INTX is what i thought in the beginning. this result made me think perhaps INTp. although it appears i don't have very strong preferences anywhere, eh?
Your results were very scattered and very moderate and without extreemity. You can not really trust what the test tries to compute from the raw data when that happens, but it is still possible to figure things out if you have a human that knows socionics well look at the raw data.Originally Posted by implied
The fact that your did not show up in the strong section makes it very very unlikely that you are INTp according to the socionics scale. However, it does make it very likely you are ENTp or INTj according to the socionics scale.
hrmm. to be of some help:
i've tested out as a myers-briggs isfp before (when i was under a great deal of low level stress and agitation.)
my "knack" is languages and linguistics. i do think i have the socionics intp tendency to amass a great deal of information on any subject that interests me (so long as it interests me. if it interests me, my memory kicks into high gear for some reason unbeknownst to me.)
i would love to be in a scientific field (physics, biology, whatever) but my simple arithmetic is horrible and i get the numbers switched around.
i can definitely "forget to eat" if i am caught up thought, as the socionics description of INTj claims.
i've been called tactless and insensitive more than once in my life. perhaps the stress i've been under lately has led to a lack of gestalt reasoning and thus influenced my test scores?
are there any types i definitely wouldn't be? i can post pictures and all that jazz if you all would like.
Well, it is good to read typology descriptions, but what we need to do is look at a person from a functional level. There are types that share functional behaviours with other types, and personality descriptions do not always cue you into those similarities.Originally Posted by implied
The only types I can see you as functionally are either INTj or ENTp ... there is no way that you are a socionics INTp or ENTj the way that I see your functions ordered here, it is impossible that you can be those types with this data ... Even what you personally described to me above seems to indicate that you are ENTp or INTj, since mostly what you described is an example of divergent learning capabilities.
The types that have the greatest degree of divergent learning ability tend to be ENTp, ENFp, INTp, and INFp ...
So, I would actually highly consider you to be ENTp from a functional level.
Try reading my personal description and see if anything applies to you. If yes, there is a good chance you are ENTp ...
My personal description is found here ... I am actually currently writting a newer one with more positive things to say, but this should do for now.
oldforumlinkviewtopic.php?t=798&start=0
implied, you're an INTJ.
Oh, and this,
He's an ISTP.Originally Posted by implied
I'm wouldn't be surpirsed if an ISTP thought he was "N" ( I thought I was an ENTP) because MBTI doesn't test well for Si, only Se. Also, some ISTPs might think they are "J" because ISTPs are perfectionists.
Ne.and what on earth does an ISTp need from an INTj if that is the case? i'm unclear on what function is being sought out in relations of benefit.
ISTPs have an inexhaustible mental repository for everything! I also know a good deal of non-Simpsons quotes that I like to throw out there from time to time.
No, but if I could figure out how that scale works, I can program a diffrent way for the test to display an analysis of functions or something.Originally Posted by implied
Implied, I have read over the data and think you are INTj ...
Anyone disagree?
That was probably McNew when he thought he wasn an ENFJ. And it's the other way around, an INTJ would like to think he's ISTP because the ISTP's strong function is the INTJ's hidden agenda.Originally Posted by implied
I'll start off with the link, http://the16types.info/functions.php. If you have others questions about the functions, just ask. :wink:i'd like more concrete, real life examples of the functions. i'm sure there are links around here i've overlooked, but if anyone can point me in the right direction, i'd be grateful.
No, she sounds like every INTJ woman ever.Originally Posted by rmcnew
oh jesus i'm not sure about that! or at least, i don't think i could tolerate that in myself (i guess having correctly typed the ex now and figured out all the intricacies.) i think having Si as a main function would fucking kill me!Originally Posted by Rocky
but it's good to know and it explains a lot of things that had confused me about his behavior before. i just didn't realize that he was so dependent on physical pleasures.
i scored as an isfp a long time ago and at that point in time, basically i was just constantly unsatisfied with no chance of internal peace. i think it would suck to be at the command of the concrete world constantly.
i've already read this numerous times. i was hoping for another resource with some more examples (maybe a book?)I'll start off with the link, http://the16types.info/functions.php. If you have others questions about the functions, just ask. :wink:
It's not that bad. I notice and remember things like the licence plate number to the car, then when people try to get into the wrong one it just makes them look like idiots. Besides, I don't forget to eat nor do I dress funny, ha!oh jesus i'm not sure about that! or at least, i don't think i could tolerate that in myself (i guess having correctly typed the ex now and figured out all the intricacies.) i think having Si as a main function would fucking kill me!
lkj;lkjlj
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Ok, ehm, I didn't know that this discussion was there. So when did you decide on being an ENFp?
I'm totally confused...
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
;lkjl;kj
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Actually, I said that when I was trying to figure out Tanzhe's type. But you wouldn't remember that, because that was way before your time. And rmcnew I think did say that too.Originally Posted by Rocky
You're right in a way. My INTj cousin often scored as ISTJ on MBTI tests, and Tanzhe thought he was ISTp for awhile, also.
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
I know, implied, but still, where did the ENFp come in?
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
[lkj
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
lkj
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
It would be a good idea to ask your friends/family what they think your type might be.
as;dflkj
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Alright, This is Implied's FIRST test before she knew much about socionics ... her primary modes are ---, which corresponds directly to INTj and INFj ...Originally Posted by implied
My guess is that on the second results, she was able to mind manipulate the results to sound more ENFp because of personal issues in her life.