6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
????
all of you are cute. dammit.
<3 i know. we're like nermal.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Originally Posted by implied
![]()
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
This thread doesn't even make sense.
thats because this thread is really masquerading as an AAA battery.
don't worry niffweed, while your wife sits at home, I plant the vermin because she needs it so.
Who is nermal?
The "kitten" from Garfield?![]()
INTp
sx/sp
Originally Posted by Rocky
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
So, what's your point? I coud find quotes from a hundred other threads of people I've typed differently (i.e. the last "VI baseball players" thread), so I don't see what 1 quote really means. Besides, only half of the people in the quote you picked I actually said were entps, so it's not even a good example. And keep in mind that were talking about T.V. reporters here which is a job made for entxs. I'm not just about to say, "Well gee were all one happy family and every type has equal impact on the media", because that's just plain silly and ignorant. I think the problem is "looking" for a bunch of people in every type in the media just so you can list them under the 16 different types, because in all honesty you are probally looking for something that doesn't exist. Also, the people I type IRL are much broder and "even" then actors/T.V. people I'd type. And if you don't believe that I don't continually try and re-evaluate the IRL people I type all the time and take it seriously, and you believe that looking for something that isn't there is better than trying to think critically, then you can go fuck yourself by sticking your head in your own vagina.
oh pffh. you don't have to insult. i'm just fucking with you! i actually agree with your post, that it would be retarded to think that the media is run by equal types etc. and i really don't doubt that there are a ton of ENTps out there. i just think it's amusing that you tend to find them all. you're jumping to conclusions and are too quick to think that i'm "against" you.
i re-evaluate types all the time, too!
but i'm not telling you to go fuck yourself and stick your head in your vagina.![]()
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Then what's the point of this thread? Even if you didn't mean it, it still implies (to other people unknowing of you actual intentions) that I type a bunch of people in the media as entp even though you think there aren't that many of them.Originally Posted by implied