at some point in my life as many others i somewaht concluded tho i think i have and may have had more open and alive perception than that that intelligence seems related to morality
examples like people not wanting to take certain decisions because since they dont understand, they think something evil is happening and fight back and resist and attack and act emotionally. this can as well be observed in yourself perahps and learning to think and to be wise. then you try to explain to others what you think and what you've learned, but if they are not intelligent or so you think, they will be disinterested because they dont ujnderstand why you say it and think that you are stupid therefore continuing in their patterns and doing harmful things that you don't have the patience to teach or explain to them. of course what they do you are afraid can even kill or make disabled or create long lasting traumas lead to poverty whatever whatever.
animals killing their babies because they dont think they are theirs because of the smell or something. you'd think thats kinda dumb.
parents or toxic people stifling other's gifts because they dont believe in them because they dont understand it's functional.
i also felt like more intelligent people can see opportunities and things to do where others can't therefore also avoid violence and find mutual reconciliations. ofc it also hit me if intelligence is inherent and cant be improved, does it mean we doomed to be a certain way? nor did i exactly like the thought that sutpid people should be killed or deserve to die, i'd also somewaht observed not so intelligent people do good things, it doesnt feel nice to be forced to do decisions that aren't good in the end, but in life so much seems of that kinda stuff. maybe thats being forced itself doing things u dont like or agree with, but the alternative is worse. there's things beyond perception as well so making the wrong decisions just bc u felt like it was right based on limited knowledge and perhaps wisdom or not being creative/thinking enough.
https://youtu.be/e2ftVR9zt0c
here he says leftists are more likely to conflate intelligence with morality. i think it has to do with that disagreeable people tend to ask stupid questions regarding morality because they dont think form others perspective thus dont even perceive it. but also that they are trying to manipulate you and make fun of you by asking you those questions, feigning that they argue from trying to understand you, when they just want to know what you think so they can make fun of you. also if you care abou tothers you imagine their perspective and their thought process, so that you can explain something in an easy way for them to understand. which makes you lost in waht they say eventually especialyl if its also not based on logic but presumptions. disageeable people may only care for what feels good to them and not the right thing to do or the structure of stuff, so they didn't even question their own biases and perspectives, they just took them because it enabled thier own position or inclinations instead of fighting their violent intrusive thoughts or urges, ofc then accusing u of being intolerant. also agreeableness will predipose u to getting walked over and looking into intelligence and psychology and stuff in the first place, like "are others more hostile than me because im dumb and inherently worse or am i actually better in a crystalised way and is that why they dont ever seem to learn nor even try to?" while disagreeableness may not result in self reflection and self assessment in introspective ways but rather external achievement, be it mocking libtards getting rich getting jacked being funny etc that also gives status and power.