So who do we know so far...
Shania Twain seems to be a pretty good example:
Are those good examples of of ESFj eyes?
Who else...?
So who do we know so far...
Shania Twain seems to be a pretty good example:
Are those good examples of of ESFj eyes?
Who else...?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
AISHWARYA RAY
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
They aren't really going to be attracted to you nonetheless.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Coco Chiang. model and host now based in Taiwan.
Sofia Vergara
I had typed her over video and interview.
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
Alizee is ESFj imho:
Her tights <3333
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
seems like udp is really determined in finding his dual.![]()
Some have speculated you as Alpha although I'm not sure. Some of the things you said sounded very ESFp, but i guess idk
You seemed irrational so ESFp, ISFp, ENTp and thats what I got.
The end is nigh
Charisma Carpenter?? Wait, I'll switch my type to INTj.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
So you want to be my Identical, FDG!?Originally Posted by FDG
![]()
I doubt it. Actually, I doubt any of the model-types listed are esfjs anyway... the esfjs I know are very very very private about their sexuality and their bodies. One was telling me how she didn't think couples should even kiss in public, which is why we've never seen her and her boyfriend kiss. Actually, she was embarassed to let other people think that they did anything more then that, even though we can obviously see the boxes of condoms they buy! This is a common theme in esfjs.Originally Posted by FDG
^^^ Loretta Lynn
edit/// I meant to say that those model types stink of exxpness.
This goes against my experience, at least my ESFj ex wasn't like that at all. Rather the opposite. I think this may be more a culture-type interaction rather than just type.Originally Posted by Rocky
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
im an ESFj and have not had a problem being at all touchy feeling in any relationship, it may have to do with the way that a person was brought up i was lucky to have had an enfp mom so she kind of just always let us be.. it was awesome!
Why?Originally Posted by Expat
Logic would dictate that if Si= sexually restrained, and esfj=Si, then esfj= sexually restrained. And that's what I've noticed with the esfjs I've known closely (which would be my sister and two other girls my age). The esxps are by far the most sexually expressive. The esfjs are much more "embarassed" by that sort of thing (which is why I think the pictures of the people above must be some sort of exxps).
what's your experience with SLIs? i think they're pretty openly sexual from my experience. maybe that's just difference of subtypes. also, i think the one i knew was SLI-Si, and therefore more sexually/sensually/physically adept, and sort of made more references to sexual interaction, but he was all talk and no real action! no initiative to form that intensity, like an SLE might be
anyway, just my two cents.
"If you can find out little melodies for yourself on the piano it is all very well. But if they come of themselves when you are not at the piano, then you have still greater reason to rejoice; for then the inner sense of music is astir in you. The fingers must make what the head wills, not vice versa."- Robert Schumann
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
You probably didn't know this, but the bulk of the posts in this thread were made before socionics was popularized in the English speaking world. That individual's notions of Si are more in line with those of the MBTI than classical socionics, and that's why they don't seem to make much sense.
Jason
As per his own words, Rocky used Jung's typology, not socionics (and not MBTI). For instance, he opposed the typical typing of ****** as ENFj (preferring ENTp instead) because he could not see "feeling" in ****** - that is, the Jungian definition of Extraverted Feeling, not the socionics definiton. That discussion emerged again when we discussed a video of the young Nelson Mandela - he saw his being harsh and angry as a sign of "absence of feeling".
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
I would agree that they are more sexually restrained than ESFps, relatively speaking. I disagree with your actual examples in absolute terms.
EDIT: okay, I said that because my ESFj ex and I would kiss in crowded tube stations in London.
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
I highly doubt Si=sexually restrained. ISFps aren't particularly restrained in regard to that.Originally Posted by Rocky
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
hahaha that's not niceOriginally Posted by FDG
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
Not socionics isfps, at least that's what the theory is. In socionics Si shys away and Se pushes forward, that's what the quadras are about. Here you'd be talking about MBTI isfps.Originally Posted by FDG
What's a "crowded tube station"?Originally Posted by Expat
... for some reason it sounds dirty...
Rocky, no.Originally Posted by Rocky
Let's take a look at the romantic description of types of socionics ISFp, do we?
Clearly, both types are said to one "be very sexual" and the other "value frequent sexual contacts".Sensory subtype: It is very sexual, inventive and diverse in the intimate plan. It is soft, but it persistently displays initiative in the rapprochement. It knows how to persuade. It is diplomatic and farsighted. Stability in the relations loves, it does not pardon treason. It is inclined to the emotional enthusiasm, but it does not always follow the call of its feelings. To it is necessary person, capable of causing his respect and admiration by his uncommon abilities. This helps to for a long time preserve to it interest, but if partner will need his concern and he will not repel by its independence.
Ethical subtype: It is romantic in the love, it is emotional, eloquent. It is reasonable and yielding, but it is touchy and we wound. It is subjected to the sharp fluctuations of mood. It can hurry events, manifest impatience. It values frequent sexual contacts. It is inclined to deeply survive its enthusiasm. It is frequently inconstant in feelings, but it is very attentive to those, whom it loves. It must be a little tormented by uncertainty, intrigued, then appeared initiative, if reciprocity it is already present. When interest is reduced, it is useful to cause light jealousy.
Also, I disagree with your distinction on pushing forward/shying away. Si is concentrated on preservation, which is different form shying away; whereas Se is concentrated on destruction and rebuilding.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
No it's not. LOL.Originally Posted by FDG
![]()
? If you want to preserve something, you nuorish, you don't shy away.Originally Posted by Rocky
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
In essence if your going for self-preservation you have to shy away. If that means food then you carefully pick out what healthy instead of gorging, if you're playing baseball then that means shying away from the plate to keep from getting hit with the ball, if you're walking over a tight rope, well then you just plain don't do it, lol (as opposed to jumping right in). And if it's sex you shy away for the self-preservation value as opposed to the procreation value (procreation is extraversion). Pretty much with anything you have to hold yourself back . It all has to do with restraint. People focused on preservation are overly-cautious, because that's what it means to preserve yourself, and so on (tired of writing).Originally Posted by FDG
Makes sense, yeah. So, how do we reconcile that with the description?Originally Posted by Rocky
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I don't know, maybe bad desruptions, just doesn't seem logically consistent to me.Originally Posted by FDG
That's what they have observed, so it doesn't matter if it's logically incosistent with the theory. I don't know either,ehehe.Originally Posted by Rocky
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Ah.Originally Posted by Rocky
"The tube" is how Londoners refer to the Underground system, which is what you call "the Subway" in NYC.
In London, a subway is merely a pedestrian tunnel to cross the street.
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
believe me rocky, i've had sex with your sister and she is not shy at all.
back on topic
seriously though=//= sexually restrained. you need to get your head out of socionics... seriously. look up that old thread on types who are the most likely to have sex the earliest and stuff too
You need to get your head out of your ass... seriously. Sometimes you have to check yourself to see if what you are saying makes sense, and if it doesn't, you have to readjust your thinking (by that I mean, Carmen Electra being esfj, clearly doesn't make logical sense). You have to refine the system, in otherwords.Originally Posted by science as magic
I agree with these
Originally Posted by implied
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
I agree with this
Originally Posted by Expat
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.