Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 146

Thread: Attractive ESEs-ESFjs

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Attractive ESEs-ESFjs

    So who do we know so far...


    Shania Twain seems to be a pretty good example:


    Are those good examples of of ESFj eyes?


    Who else...?
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  2. #2
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,747
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default














    AISHWARYA RAY
    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

  3. #3
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,615
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    They aren't really going to be attracted to you nonetheless.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  4. #4
    eunice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,957
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Coco Chiang. model and host now based in Taiwan.

  5. #5
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Sofia Vergara

    I had typed her over video and interview.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  6. #6
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,615
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Alizee is ESFj imho:



    Her tights <3333
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  7. #7
    eunice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,957
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    seems like udp is really determined in finding his dual.

  8. #8

  9. #9
    take a second of me sarinana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Originally from black hole, currently residing in Jupiter
    TIM
    EIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,145
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by science as magic View Post
    hkkmr just told me I look like her. Does that make me ESFj?

  10. #10
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some have speculated you as Alpha although I'm not sure. Some of the things you said sounded very ESFp, but i guess idk

    You seemed irrational so ESFp, ISFp, ENTp and thats what I got.
    The end is nigh

  11. #11
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,615
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Charisma Carpenter?? Wait, I'll switch my type to INTj.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Charisma Carpenter?? Wait, I'll switch my type to INTj.
    So you want to be my Identical, FDG!?

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Charisma Carpenter??
    I doubt it. Actually, I doubt any of the model-types listed are esfjs anyway... the esfjs I know are very very very private about their sexuality and their bodies. One was telling me how she didn't think couples should even kiss in public, which is why we've never seen her and her boyfriend kiss. Actually, she was embarassed to let other people think that they did anything more then that, even though we can obviously see the boxes of condoms they buy! This is a common theme in esfjs.




    ^^^ Loretta Lynn


    edit/// I meant to say that those model types stink of exxpness.
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  14. #14
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    I doubt it. Actually, I doubt any of the model-types listed are esfjs anyway... the esfjs I know are very very very private about their sexuality and their bodies. One was telling me how she didn't think couples should even kiss in public, which is why we've never seen her and her boyfriend kiss. Actually, she was embarassed to let other people think that they did anything more then that, even though we can obviously see the boxes of condoms they buy! This is a common theme in esfjs.
    This goes against my experience, at least my ESFj ex wasn't like that at all. Rather the opposite. I think this may be more a culture-type interaction rather than just type.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  15. #15
    pumpkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    US
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    im an ESFj and have not had a problem being at all touchy feeling in any relationship, it may have to do with the way that a person was brought up i was lucky to have had an enfp mom so she kind of just always let us be.. it was awesome!

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    I doubt it. Actually, I doubt any of the model-types listed are esfjs anyway... the esfjs I know are very very very private about their sexuality and their bodies. One was telling me how she didn't think couples should even kiss in public, which is why we've never seen her and her boyfriend kiss. Actually, she was embarassed to let other people think that they did anything more then that, even though we can obviously see the boxes of condoms they buy! This is a common theme in esfjs.
    This goes against my experience, at least my ESFj ex wasn't like that at all. Rather the opposite. I think this may be more a culture-type interaction rather than just type.
    Why?

    Logic would dictate that if Si= sexually restrained, and esfj=Si, then esfj= sexually restrained. And that's what I've noticed with the esfjs I've known closely (which would be my sister and two other girls my age). The esxps are by far the most sexually expressive. The esfjs are much more "embarassed" by that sort of thing (which is why I think the pictures of the people above must be some sort of exxps).
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  17. #17
    pluie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    TIM
    IEI 4 sx
    Posts
    300
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky View Post
    Why?

    Logic would dictate that if Si= sexually restrained, and esfj=Si, then esfj= sexually restrained. And that's what I've noticed with the esfjs I've known closely (which would be my sister and two other girls my age). The esxps are by far the most sexually expressive. The esfjs are much more "embarassed" by that sort of thing (which is why I think the pictures of the people above must be some sort of exxps).
    what's your experience with SLIs? i think they're pretty openly sexual from my experience. maybe that's just difference of subtypes. also, i think the one i knew was SLI-Si, and therefore more sexually/sensually/physically adept, and sort of made more references to sexual interaction, but he was all talk and no real action! no initiative to form that intensity, like an SLE might be

    anyway, just my two cents.
    "If you can find out little melodies for yourself on the piano it is all very well. But if they come of themselves when you are not at the piano, then you have still greater reason to rejoice; for then the inner sense of music is astir in you. The fingers must make what the head wills, not vice versa."- Robert Schumann

  18. #18
    Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Beyond the blue horizon
    TIM
    SLI-Si 8w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    13,421
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    “Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    You've done yourself a huge favor developmentally by mustering the balls to do something really fucking scary... in about the most vulnerable situation possible.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,038
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


  20. #20
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pluie View Post
    what's your experience with SLIs? i think they're pretty openly sexual from my experience. maybe that's just difference of subtypes. also, i think the one i knew was SLI-Si, and therefore more sexually/sensually/physically adept, and sort of made more references to sexual interaction, but he was all talk and no real action! no initiative to form that intensity, like an SLE might be

    anyway, just my two cents.
    You probably didn't know this, but the bulk of the posts in this thread were made before socionics was popularized in the English speaking world. That individual's notions of Si are more in line with those of the MBTI than classical socionics, and that's why they don't seem to make much sense.

    Jason

  21. #21
    Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Beyond the blue horizon
    TIM
    SLI-Si 8w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    13,421
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    That individual's notions of Si are more in line with those of the MBTI than classical socionics, and that's why they don't seem to make much sense.
    And since that individual is not here to speak for himself now, I would like to state that what you're saying is absolutely wrong.
    “Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    You've done yourself a huge favor developmentally by mustering the balls to do something really fucking scary... in about the most vulnerable situation possible.

  22. #22
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Winterpark View Post
    And since that individual is not here to speak for himself now, I would like to state that what you're saying is absolutely wrong.
    As per his own words, Rocky used Jung's typology, not socionics (and not MBTI). For instance, he opposed the typical typing of ****** as ENFj (preferring ENTp instead) because he could not see "feeling" in ****** - that is, the Jungian definition of Extraverted Feeling, not the socionics definiton. That discussion emerged again when we discussed a video of the young Nelson Mandela - he saw his being harsh and angry as a sign of "absence of feeling".
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  23. #23
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Winterpark View Post
    And since that individual is not here to speak for himself now, I would like to state that what you're saying is absolutely wrong.
    Whether it's MBTI or classical Jungian personality typing makes no real difference, IMO. The point was that he wasn't speaking about socionics as most people know it on the forum today.

    Jason
    Last edited by jason_m; 06-04-2009 at 02:27 AM.

  24. #24
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I would agree that they are more sexually restrained than ESFps, relatively speaking. I disagree with your actual examples in absolute terms.

    EDIT: okay, I said that because my ESFj ex and I would kiss in crowded tube stations in London.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  25. #25
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,615
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by Expat
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    I doubt it. Actually, I doubt any of the model-types listed are esfjs anyway... the esfjs I know are very very very private about their sexuality and their bodies. One was telling me how she didn't think couples should even kiss in public, which is why we've never seen her and her boyfriend kiss. Actually, she was embarassed to let other people think that they did anything more then that, even though we can obviously see the boxes of condoms they buy! This is a common theme in esfjs.
    This goes against my experience, at least my ESFj ex wasn't like that at all. Rather the opposite. I think this may be more a culture-type interaction rather than just type.
    Why?

    Logic would dictate that if Si= sexually restrained, and esfj=Si, then esfj= sexually restrained. And that's what I've noticed with the esfjs I've known closely (which would be my sister and two other girls my age). The esxps are by far the most sexually expressive. The esfjs are much more "embarassed" by that sort of thing (which is why I think the pictures of the people above must be some sort of exxps).
    I highly doubt Si=sexually restrained. ISFps aren't particularly restrained in regard to that.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  26. #26
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,714
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    They aren't really going to be attracted to you nonetheless.
    hahaha that's not nice

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  27. #27

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    I highly doubt Si=sexually restrained. ISFps aren't particularly restrained in regard to that.
    Not socionics isfps, at least that's what the theory is. In socionics Si shys away and Se pushes forward, that's what the quadras are about. Here you'd be talking about MBTI isfps.
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  28. #28

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat
    I would agree that they are more sexually restrained than ESFps, relatively speaking. I disagree with your actual examples in absolute terms.

    EDIT: okay, I said that because my ESFj ex and I would kiss in crowded tube stations in London.
    What's a "crowded tube station"?

    ... for some reason it sounds dirty...
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  29. #29
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,615
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by Expat
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    I doubt it. Actually, I doubt any of the model-types listed are esfjs anyway... the esfjs I know are very very very private about their sexuality and their bodies. One was telling me how she didn't think couples should even kiss in public, which is why we've never seen her and her boyfriend kiss. Actually, she was embarassed to let other people think that they did anything more then that, even though we can obviously see the boxes of condoms they buy! This is a common theme in esfjs.
    This goes against my experience, at least my ESFj ex wasn't like that at all. Rather the opposite. I think this may be more a culture-type interaction rather than just type.
    Why?

    Logic would dictate that if Si= sexually restrained, and esfj=Si, then esfj= sexually restrained. And that's what I've noticed with the esfjs I've known closely (which would be my sister and two other girls my age). The esxps are by far the most sexually expressive. The esfjs are much more "embarassed" by that sort of thing (which is why I think the pictures of the people above must be some sort of exxps).
    I highly doubt Si=sexually restrained. ISFps aren't particularly restrained in regard to that.
    Not socionics isfps, at least that's what the theory is. In socionics Si shys away and Se pushes forward, that's what the quadras are about. Here you'd be talking about MBTI isfps.
    Rocky, no.

    Let's take a look at the romantic description of types of socionics ISFp, do we?

    Sensory subtype: It is very sexual, inventive and diverse in the intimate plan. It is soft, but it persistently displays initiative in the rapprochement. It knows how to persuade. It is diplomatic and farsighted. Stability in the relations loves, it does not pardon treason. It is inclined to the emotional enthusiasm, but it does not always follow the call of its feelings. To it is necessary person, capable of causing his respect and admiration by his uncommon abilities. This helps to for a long time preserve to it interest, but if partner will need his concern and he will not repel by its independence.

    Ethical subtype: It is romantic in the love, it is emotional, eloquent. It is reasonable and yielding, but it is touchy and we wound. It is subjected to the sharp fluctuations of mood. It can hurry events, manifest impatience. It values frequent sexual contacts. It is inclined to deeply survive its enthusiasm. It is frequently inconstant in feelings, but it is very attentive to those, whom it loves. It must be a little tormented by uncertainty, intrigued, then appeared initiative, if reciprocity it is already present. When interest is reduced, it is useful to cause light jealousy.
    Clearly, both types are said to one "be very sexual" and the other "value frequent sexual contacts".

    Also, I disagree with your distinction on pushing forward/shying away. Si is concentrated on preservation, which is different form shying away; whereas Se is concentrated on destruction and rebuilding.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  30. #30

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    preservation, which is different form shying away;
    No it's not. LOL.
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  31. #31
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,615
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    preservation, which is different form shying away;
    No it's not. LOL.
    ? If you want to preserve something, you nuorish, you don't shy away.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  32. #32

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    preservation, which is different form shying away;
    No it's not. LOL.
    ? If you want to preserve something, you nuorish, you don't shy away.
    In essence if your going for self-preservation you have to shy away. If that means food then you carefully pick out what healthy instead of gorging, if you're playing baseball then that means shying away from the plate to keep from getting hit with the ball, if you're walking over a tight rope, well then you just plain don't do it, lol (as opposed to jumping right in). And if it's sex you shy away for the self-preservation value as opposed to the procreation value (procreation is extraversion). Pretty much with anything you have to hold yourself back . It all has to do with restraint. People focused on preservation are overly-cautious, because that's what it means to preserve yourself, and so on (tired of writing).
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  33. #33
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,615
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    preservation, which is different form shying away;
    No it's not. LOL.
    ? If you want to preserve something, you nuorish, you don't shy away.
    In essence if your going for self-preservation you have to shy away. If that means food then you carefully pick out what healthy instead of gorging, if you're playing baseball then that means shying away from the plate to keep from getting hit with the ball, if you're walking over a tight rope, well then you just plain don't do it, lol (as opposed to jumping right in). And if it's sex you shy away for the self-preservation value as opposed to the procreation value (procreation is extraversion). Pretty much with anything you have to hold yourself back . It all has to do with restraint. People focused on preservation are overly-cautious, because that's what it means to preserve yourself, and so on (tired of writing).
    Makes sense, yeah. So, how do we reconcile that with the description?
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  34. #34

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    preservation, which is different form shying away;
    No it's not. LOL.
    ? If you want to preserve something, you nuorish, you don't shy away.
    In essence if your going for self-preservation you have to shy away. If that means food then you carefully pick out what healthy instead of gorging, if you're playing baseball then that means shying away from the plate to keep from getting hit with the ball, if you're walking over a tight rope, well then you just plain don't do it, lol (as opposed to jumping right in). And if it's sex you shy away for the self-preservation value as opposed to the procreation value (procreation is extraversion). Pretty much with anything you have to hold yourself back . It all has to do with restraint. People focused on preservation are overly-cautious, because that's what it means to preserve yourself, and so on (tired of writing).
    Makes sense, yeah. So, how do we reconcile that with the description?
    I don't know, maybe bad desruptions, just doesn't seem logically consistent to me.
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  35. #35
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,615
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    preservation, which is different form shying away;
    No it's not. LOL.
    ? If you want to preserve something, you nuorish, you don't shy away.
    In essence if your going for self-preservation you have to shy away. If that means food then you carefully pick out what healthy instead of gorging, if you're playing baseball then that means shying away from the plate to keep from getting hit with the ball, if you're walking over a tight rope, well then you just plain don't do it, lol (as opposed to jumping right in). And if it's sex you shy away for the self-preservation value as opposed to the procreation value (procreation is extraversion). Pretty much with anything you have to hold yourself back . It all has to do with restraint. People focused on preservation are overly-cautious, because that's what it means to preserve yourself, and so on (tired of writing).
    Makes sense, yeah. So, how do we reconcile that with the description?
    I don't know, maybe bad desruptions, just doesn't seem logically consistent to me.
    That's what they have observed, so it doesn't matter if it's logically incosistent with the theory. I don't know either,ehehe.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  36. #36
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    What's a "crowded tube station"?

    ... for some reason it sounds dirty...
    Ah.

    "The tube" is how Londoners refer to the Underground system, which is what you call "the Subway" in NYC.

    In London, a subway is merely a pedestrian tunnel to cross the street.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  37. #37

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    M-H λ
    Posts
    2,608
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    believe me rocky, i've had sex with your sister and she is not shy at all.

    back on topic



    seriously though =//= sexually restrained. you need to get your head out of socionics... seriously. look up that old thread on types who are the most likely to have sex the earliest and stuff too

  38. #38

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by science as magic
    seriously though =//= sexually restrained. you need to get your head out of socionics... seriously. look up that old thread on types who are the most likely to have sex the earliest and stuff too
    You need to get your head out of your ass... seriously. Sometimes you have to check yourself to see if what you are saying makes sense, and if it doesn't, you have to readjust your thinking (by that I mean, Carmen Electra being esfj, clearly doesn't make logical sense). You have to refine the system, in otherwords.
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  39. #39
    Dioklecian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    4,304
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I agree with these

    Quote Originally Posted by implied













    AISHWARYA RAY
    Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.

  40. #40
    Dioklecian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    4,304
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I agree with this

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat


    Sofia Vergara

    I had typed her over video and interview.
    Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •