Quote Originally Posted by godslave View Post
Yes, I would say that the additional work and contribution of other socionics people are not really part of Model A but rather a part of what is socionics now. As a matter of fact some of the early contributors later went on and created their own Models... Plus there is a lack of consensus when it comes to the +- signs even among Model A schools.

The socionics litterature is quite a mess one has to keep in mind that it is still a work in progress. When it comes to Aushra's writings one has to make triage and discard what is obsolete (a lot of her early work is full of nonsense and contradictions) from what is now considered "canon" if you allow me that expression.
Yeah I'm aware of all of that , even though I still think Ausra's work is better than many current models

btw lemme take the opportunity and ask: what do you think my type is , aside from what I wrote today? I don't remember I asked you before , and I'm open to different views atm