That's really interesting. I guess I can't know exactly what you mean, but I can see that explaining the leading vs creative functions!
Ohh, which Superman and Clark Kent?
From a psychoanalytic perspective, it seems like you associate negativity to thinking, which probably does relate to thinking as repressed and F as your ego.
I don't always agree with these people, but this is interesting and it kind of reminds me of your posts?
I'm guessing she's ESE? Could be wrong, I don't know her obviously, but I guess they see the Fe too.
From Chapter X
But nothing disturbs feeling so much as thinking. It is at once intelligible, therefore, that this type should repress thinking as much as possible. This does not mean to say that such a woman does not think at all; on the contrary, she may even think a great deal and very ably, but her thinking is never sui generis; it is, in fact, an Epimethean appendage to her feeling.
I think that's interesting because I've noticed people with a lot of Fe often can appear like Ti types or involve a lot of Ti, but all of their thinking comes from feeling, really. Like Jordan Peterson seems to be high on neuroticism and a lot of his Ti is heavily biased based on how his Fe has taken stuff in. It can be frustrating dealing with them, because they project their negative feelings on to other people.
We have already seen that the extraverted feeling type, as a rule, represses his thinking, just because thinking is the function most liable to disturb feeling. Similarly, when thinking seeks to arrive at pure results of any kind, its first act is to exclude feeling, since nothing is calculated to harass and falsify thinking so much as feeling-values. Thinking, therefore, in so far as it is an independent function, is repressed in the extraverted feeling type. Its repression, as I observed before, is complete only in so far as its inexorable logic forces it to conclusions that are incompatible with feeling. It is suffered to exist as the servant of feeling, or more accurately its slave. Its backbone is broken; it may not operate on its own account, in accordance with its own laws, Now, since a logic exists producing inexorably right conclusions, this must happen somewhere, although beyond the bounds of consciousness, i.e. in the unconscious. Pre-eminently, therefore, the unconscious content of this type is a particular kind of thinking. It is an infantile, archaic, and negative thinking.
Jordan Peterson doesn't seem to understand this about himself! And he was (or is) a "professional" psychologist! Imagine that!
I'm starting to wonder if this is -> Ni. Not that I'm saying you'd have to be Ni ego, but probably some NF then.
I'm also thinking this is Ni related. It's hard to explain or show people, it's much more personal.
Okay, I'd be interested to hear what people think about this. I
think that's Fe. I mean I can relate! It makes certain people sometimes very hard to be around.
Oh, I think this means you are an extrovert!
The bolded kind of sounds like Ni as well. But I guess I'm not completely sure. Maybe it's more like introspection, which isn't necessarily related to type? Or is that more like dissociation? It's not exactly clear from a psychoanalytic point. I guess introspection is separate from type. It's becoming aware of yourself and looking at and integrating the conscious/unconscious duality. That's sounds good. I'm going with that.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Distance
Shannon on the other hand has got sexier...
