As time passes, this excerpt from a Gulenko workshop is making more and more sense.. I know it's possible to smooth things out by correct distribution of roles, but I realize that the things that connects us the most are exactly the things that create the most friction, that is: the difference of what is (Si) and what could be (Ne), and How I feel about things versus what is said stated (F vs T).
Audience: It's not easy for them to come together, but after it's difficult to separate them
I have to say that it was not hard for us to merge, but we both had duality experiences in the past (5-8 months seeing each other once a week, then click), but we still haven't "separated" for more than a few hours (we are still interacting all the time since the beginning of the click, which happened last year around this time of the year), so I don't know what's like to stay away from her for long.
V.G. This is it, relations between duals are dialectic, they both love and hate each other. This is unavoidable. Dual relations are synthesis of the opposites. This struggle is unavoidable.
Is there any way to get rid of these painful contradictions between duals, in principle?
I'd say it's not true hate.. but sometimes we get contradicting feelings after some clashing, usually on the N vs S side, but as if some miracle of fate, we end up having honest conversations which resolve things, and after that, we generally feel a greater pull towards each other, or it feels like some new possibility has been unlocked and a broader vision and learning has developed.
V.G. In principle it's impossible. It's possible to smooth them out, by correct distribution of roles in dual pair for example, but it's impossible to remove them. This, precisely, is life; these contradictions give dual relations a special tint, without it they would have been boring. Periodically contradictions arise, they get resolved, come up, get resolved, come up, get resolved again - this is dialectical contradictory synthesis. Considering that this is the union and the struggle of the opposites, duals often come together over conflict. At first, they fight one another, raise scandals, sort out relations, then suddenly they feel a pull towards each other. This is how it happens, such is nature.
The highlighted is the the key sentence here. This whole arising of contradictions and resolving is accurate. We haven't come to the point of sorting out relations but (especially in the beginning), we had discussed the possibility of not being good for each other. And some contradictions were intense.
I just want to point out that, even though I'm suspicious of Gulenko's material, this specific instance of his teachings is true for my experience.
The things that connect us are precisely the things that challenge us.