User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Self Introduction (Will anyone read it and befriend with me?)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Red face Self Introduction (Will anyone read it and befriend with me?)

    I am ENTP 548.
    I want to do more observation and thinking.
    I cannot tolerate anti-Nietzsche people but as long as we avoid relevant discussion we can have normal, shallow acquaintanceship.
    I am pretty particular and aggressive and do not have many friends.
    I wont write very long just to clarify something clear to me. Ill try to be as informative as possible.
    I think the base of Jung and Enneagram theories come from wrong idealism but they still form valid objective observation. So they are kind of science.
    Nice to meet you if you think it's nice to meet me
    I like to make friends really, I am just impatient, arrogant, eccentric and dont like responsibilities

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,544
    Mentioned
    1384 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daesina View Post
    I am ENTP <...> I cannot tolerate anti-Nietzsche people
    recommend to make a typing theme with a video
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...fo-for-novices

    > I think the base of Jung and Enneagram theories come from wrong idealism but they still form valid objective observation. So they are kind of science.

    Formally science is what gotten experimental proof. To this moment ideas of Jung have not it.
    While the base for Enneagram compared to Jung types is close to nothing from rational point, besides experimental part.

    Your style of understanding what is science closer to subjectivity. And rather unusual. This adds doubts in ENTP.

    The main what you may get from Socionics about Jung types is intertype relations hypothesis. It 1) allows to check own type, 2) to find a pair better from types point (practically needs big luck).
    Also Socionics tried to develop Jung functions in e/i variants to easier practical usage, - there are interesting additions and some mistakes.
    To use model with 8 functional variants was good approach, but the only useful done is limited by IR part.

    > I like to make friends really, I am just impatient, arrogant, eccentric and dont like responsibilities

    In case you'll want be friends with someone - this means mutual care, what is opposite to be irresponsible. Pals and friendship - is different. IR theory allows to notice people who are easier to establish friendship. With keeping the approach on being individualistic and irresponsibile with people you are doubtful to get a usefulness from Socionics.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I dont know this will happen so quickly. I dont want to be responsible with my friends, and you are not my friends, what make you think you can add law to my personal friendship? Jung clearly stated some philosophy highly identical to those of the base of early science, have you ever read his books? And yes dude I now agree Ill get notthing here. just saying something abnormal and boom it gets me in trouble.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Please dont ban me directly, just delete my account and the thread. I dont know how to delete my account. Thank you

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I thought this is a thinking forum then booms! just for some morality guy to tell me what to do

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •