Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: The Highly Sensitive ILI

  1. #1
    Fractals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    Gulenko: ILI-H E7
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default The Highly Sensitive ILI




    Here's a vid with an ILI and she talks about the functions in a way that I can relate to a lot. She seems similar to me in a lot of ways, yet appears to be emotional like myself. So when I say I do like talking about my feelings sometimes, it's mainly because I need that sort of human connection, or I will go into my Ni and just have some negative self talk a lot. So mostly for my mental health and well being socially. Which I did not deem it as that important when I was younger. So what are your thoughts. Please don't mistype her as SEI, that would be so annoying. Thank you.

  2. #2
    ⅃υʜƨɘqƨ mɒ I WhatYeahOK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    bnɒl ɔidmi⅃
    TIM
    ƎIƎ
    Posts
    492
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've seen her, she used to channel with an INFP together, Casual Cognition.

    Legit type. Yeah, it's annoying when people do that SEI thing or what eva. This sight is high on eccentrism.....


    Bite the tongue when the bytes are not nibbledperiod

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    14,333
    Mentioned
    1318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    it's LSE. INTJ = LII
    She's not "highly sensitive" in emotions compared to common for F types.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fractals View Post
    She seems similar to me in a lot of ways
    Not in a way of same type.
    You seem to have F.

    Quote Originally Posted by WhatYeahOK View Post
    she used to channel with an INFP together, Casual Cognition
    2nd has S
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  4. #4
    Fractals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    Gulenko: ILI-H E7
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    it's LSE. INTJ = LII
    She's not "highly sensitive" in emotions compared to common for F types.



    Not in a way of same type.
    You seem to have F.



    2nd has S
    Noooooooo. Stop it.

  5. #5
    ⅃υʜƨɘqƨ mɒ I WhatYeahOK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    bnɒl ɔidmi⅃
    TIM
    ƎIƎ
    Posts
    492
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fractals View Post
    Noooooooo. Stop it.
    Both those girls are intuitive. If you watched enough of the content you could see Casual as Ne user high with her methods in typology. The other grl is obviously ILI if anyone has seen the type.

    Fe frustration: gimmeee a break with that, c,mmon, take those scales off those eyes.

    sol has intuition ignoring as his function. Ni PoLR and Ne ignoring


    Bite the tongue when the bytes are not nibbledperiod

  6. #6
    nifl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Posts
    1,092
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WhatYeahOK View Post
    sol has intuition ignoring as his function. Ni PoLR and Ne ignoring
    compared with the average sensor he's less ignoring of it and could have it slightly stronger: as he has had a long interest in psychology, and as Ne seems to be a main function in non-verbal mannerismic typing which is his main way for famous people. also i recall him saying something about having a family history of mystical inclinations, so maybe he has an inherently stronger inclination towards intuition stuff than the average sensor
    in Model A terminology LSE does not have Ne ignoring

  7. #7
    ⅃υʜƨɘqƨ mɒ I WhatYeahOK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    bnɒl ɔidmi⅃
    TIM
    ƎIƎ
    Posts
    492
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nifl View Post
    compared with the average sensor he's less ignoring of it and could have it slightly stronger: as he has had a long interest in psychology, and as Ne seems to be a main function in non-verbal mannerismic typing which is his main way for famous people. also i recall him saying something about having a family history of mystical inclinations, so maybe he has an inherently stronger inclination towards intuition stuff than the average sensor
    in Model A terminology LSE does not have Ne ignoring
    His intuitive understanding of people here, in their types of what they claim to be, has demonstrated a profound Mr Magoo syndrome. Those two girls are what they claim to be. Park is not Fe, nor Amoeba, them' boys are your type, nifl. I'm not Ti PoLR as he's been formulating IEE for me. lol.

    Overall he's likable, just take what you can is the take away.


    Thoughts?


    Bite the tongue when the bytes are not nibbledperiod

  8. #8
    nifl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Posts
    1,092
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WhatYeahOK View Post
    Thoughts?
    Park is not Fe
    ethical seems more possible than logical; see his tendency to be emotionally engaging with people on the forum

    Amoeba
    most likely Fe, maybe even Beta Fe (from a Si perspective some of his comments/humor are somewhat weird; also claimed that SLI is one of the sensors with best Ni, which could be an attempt to explain to himself having a pesky imagination). he strikes me as reminiscent of Beautiful Sky

    them' boys are your type, nifl
    definitely not
    on socioforum i typed one person as SLI (and others, too. SLI-consensus was high even though she got intuitive-ethics on tests): Gellathefox is her username. her forum presence is more in line with what i'd expect from that type. you could take a look with a translator.

    Overall he's likable
    most importantly, he's the best typer i've seen, in my opinion; he uses good methods and has done so for long, and taking his advice helped me to conclude my type. besides his expertise he's uncomplicated, but not very fascinating in his ways, as he's my mirror. they're sympathetic and communication is easy, but everyday-like (same strong functions; same values). if you have IEE as he aired as a possibility (activation; IEE-LSE), then you may find that more explicitly likeable, as the manner of activators is fascinatingly exotic (opposite strong functions), but not repulsive (opposite values).

  9. #9
    ⅃υʜƨɘqƨ mɒ I WhatYeahOK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    bnɒl ɔidmi⅃
    TIM
    ƎIƎ
    Posts
    492
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nifl View Post
    ethical seems more possible than logical; see his tendency to be emotionally engaging with people on the forum


    most likely Fe, maybe even Beta Fe (from a Si perspective some of his comments/humor are somewhat weird; also claimed that SLI is one of the sensors with best Ni, which could be an attempt to explain to himself having a pesky imagination). he strikes me as reminiscent of Beautiful Sky


    definitely not
    on socioforum i typed one person as SLI (and others, too. SLI-consensus was high even though she got intuitive-ethics on tests): Gellathefox is her username. her forum presence is more in line with what i'd expect from that type. you could take a look with a translator.


    most importantly, he's the best typer i've seen, in my opinion; he uses good methods and has done so for long, and taking his advice helped me to conclude my type. besides his expertise he's uncomplicated, but not very fascinating in his ways, as he's my mirror. they're sympathetic and communication is easy, but everyday-like (same strong functions; same values). if you have IEE as he aired as a possibility (activation; IEE-LSE), then you may find that more explicitly likeable, as the manner of activators is fascinatingly exotic (opposite strong functions), but not repulsive (opposite values).
    I mean he's irritating, and stubborn and set in his ways, and more wrong than right. He upsets the Fe cart on the forum. He doesn't follow good manners in the Fe department by badgering people.

    But overall he gives enough to where something is offer-able. I don't dislike him as a person. He could do better, but he doesn't listen, but badgers on and on and on. Runs at you with the dictionary ad infinitum.

    You guys have no Ti using ability, and cannot see the forest for the trees. You find one data point and it changes everything for you.


    Bite the tongue when the bytes are not nibbledperiod

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    Ennea 6w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    758
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some Gamma NTs can be pretty sensitive, especially to how people have been treated and I would think ILI-Ni more than most types actually... they're not like many other types that can quickly get over what has happened to them and they can be quick to enter relationships that they're unhappy with. Unless I'm in an usually bad mood, I can almost always quickly get over how people treated me, or at least not be wounded over it for long at all (maybe a little shock for like 2-5 seconds), although I can be angered and even have revenge fantasies without knowing how to or being able to carry out the best way to carry out revenge, so i usually don't do it.
    I'm not only psychologically disturbed, I'm also QueeferSutherlandJeffersonianSecessionist87@sucksd ick.com


  11. #11
    Fractals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    Gulenko: ILI-H E7
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Disturbed View Post
    Some Gamma NTs can be pretty sensitive, especially to how people have been treated and I would think ILI-Ni more than most types actually... they're not like many other types that can quickly get over what has happened to them and they can be quick to enter relationships that they're unhappy with. Unless I'm in an usually bad mood, I can almost always quickly get over how people treated me, or at least not be wounded over it for long at all (maybe a little shock for like 2-5 seconds), although I can be angered and even have revenge fantasies without knowing how to or being able to carry out the best way to carry out revenge, so i usually don't do it.
    Yeah, I'm thinking I may be Ni subtype. It takes awhile until I'm over the way someone has treated me. Maybe a couple of hours, and I physically feel ill sometimes or really angry. But maybe a person or thing can distract me, and I'll slowly feel better. Wish when this happens it can take less time, because when someone acts really offensively towards me, it can take a bit to wrap my head around it, because I actually care about the world and the people in it, even myself because I am human too.

  12. #12
    Fractals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    Gulenko: ILI-H E7
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Whoa, I stayed up all night so pretty tired and missed your last sentence. I get revenge fantasies too! But end up doing nothing after entertaining myself to feel better.

  13. #13
    Warm Soapy Water's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lamp
    TIM
    ESE-Fe
    Posts
    14,702
    Mentioned
    652 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Needs more males for balance maybe, because I think many ppl are gonna think she's highly sensitive because she's a woman and not anything to do with her type. Even logical type females can come off as sensitive etc. The problem is getting men to admit they are highly sensitive even when they clearly are, even when they are assholes or ur average redneck ILI gamma etc. I can see how the label can be kind of cringe.... but I have faith that women can help them see that a lot better than other men can which they naturally would feel more in competition with because heteronormatively ((and even homonormatively)) men can be huge sadistic assholes to the feelings of other males etc.

    But from a logical pov it does make sense and I can see what she's saying. Sensitivity comes from introversion, not just the F/T axis. E v I = I is more sensitive. N vs S = N is more sensitive. T vs F = F is more sensitive. J vs P = P is more sensitive or is it J??? Holy shit IEI is probably the most sensitive type. /gets razor blade. But idk about that, EIIs seem more sensitive to some sexual things that I'm not. I'm not very sensitive to the moral disgust of perversion that Deltas tend to be - or pretending to be for their careers hahahahhaa. So stereotypically speaking the most sensitive type might be EII. This fits into my theory that Ixxj types are the most sensitive to sickness and disease too.

    Like ESE for example, they seem sensitive cuz of the F orientation but not all that sensitive due to their extroversion and outgoingness, they can seem abrasive and cause sensitivity in others that way.

    ILI males don't seem sensitive when they go all Hannibal Lector on you. But they do seem sensitive in that they often want u to do the same thing back to them and spar with them etc.

  14. #14
    ⅃υʜƨɘqƨ mɒ I WhatYeahOK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    bnɒl ɔidmi⅃
    TIM
    ƎIƎ
    Posts
    492
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    As an aside from HSP, don't forget middle feeling types are Feeling hidden agenda, so you are Fi- ing out there with Ni, and Te is just a tool function you use when you need it.

    Middle feeling types can come off F because that's what you are responding to, ethics. You driven in attraction to things, and or people.

    You luv to be an expert in a few things.

    HSP affects all types. It's related to a lack of filtering out sense data and you are stuck with everything now. It is prob. a disorder in high side of the spectrum, because if anything interferes with day to day living that is the accepted metric for "disorder," by mental health def. though it is not considered one.
    Last edited by WhatYeahOK; 05-27-2023 at 03:30 PM.


    Bite the tongue when the bytes are not nibbledperiod

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •