Quadra values test

[Squirrel]

https://onlinetestpad.com/hph3hm55mga5e

Test in Russian , use translator

My results :

Alpha 3

Beta 0

Gamma 2

Delta 5

Don't forget to share your results

[Nunki]

This test kept me guessing right up until the end. My result was Beta.

[Squirrel]

This test kept me guessing right up until the end. My result was Beta.

Same , I added a Russian one too

Russian one :

https://onlinetestpad.com/hph3hm55mga5e

[Sol]

To understand own functional values is better by IR. As it's about what you like more.
Such is easier.

[Squirrel]

To understand own functional values is better by IR

Just in case you don't know , this is not a serious official thread to identify the type , relax and take it easy

Such is easier.

It's more difficult, you have to be fairly close to others and identify their types accurately and not fall into the trap of "I like this person / this person treats me well so my relationship with him should be good in theory"

[Sol]

this is not a serious official thread to identify the type

You've offered a test to identify own valued functions based on self-report about common behavior and preferences.
It was that test (by mewcat), initially posted by you.

> It's more difficult

Much easier is to understand _correctly_ your values.

The process before sure is harder than to answer questions for 30 min.
But this process is obligate for own type understanding, as methods are speculative and people do mistakes often. Just some monthes of logical thinking, intuitive impressions from nonverbal and tests for 10 people near.

All cases when people mistake in own type - it's the ones who did not used thoroughly IR to check own type. While IR is main what Socionics brings. It's m.. not smart to not use for yourself the main part of what you are interested in. While the reality is mostly so.
Some go even "wiser" and when (having mistakes in types) notice regular non-matching with IR theory for themselves - they just reject IR theory, pervert it or reduce evaluation of its influence. *sigh* Examples of a pervertion are ideas that duals are not interesting (not attract the attention), that to notice good of duality you should have rather close relations, that exist "subtypes" which are more important (Gulenko), that duality does not help to have good friendship etc nonsense.
Also there are people who assign themselves one type, then another one, etc. This happens for years - when they change opinions and doubt. This time they'd could to direct on typing well-known people and IR checking. And after not so long time of thinking to settle on 1 and good based own type. But they do not.
People idiocy and abbility to fool themselves has no limits.

[Beautiful sky]

Just in case you don't know , this is not a serious official thread to identify the type , relax and take it easy



It's more difficult, you have to be fairly close to others and identify their types accurately and not fall into the trap of "I like this person / this person treats me well so my relationship with him should be good in theory"

Lord help us

[Beautiful sky]

Just in case you don't know , this is not a serious official thread to identify the type , relax and take it easy



It's more difficult, you have to be fairly close to others and identify their types accurately and not fall into the trap of "I like this person / this person treats me well so my relationship with him should be good in theory"

.

[phonecharger]

I got beta even though I didn't really choose any fe-valuing options

[Squirrel]

I got beta even though I didn't really choose any fe-valuing options

I'll update the thread with the Russian one then

[Squirrel]

You've offered a test to identify own valued functions based on self-report about common behavior and preferences.
It was that test (by mewcat), initially posted by you

Yes, but the purpose of the thread is not to type , it's a kind of entertaining side activity , should I write my intentions in the thread original post so that you don't take it seriously?

All cases when people mistake in own type - it's the ones who did not used thoroughly IR to check own type.

Do you have statistics / evidence for this information, or you're generalizing your own experience that doesn't necessarilyi apply to everyone?

While IR is main what Socionics brings. It's m.. not smart to not use for yourself the main part of what you are interested in. While the reality is mostly so.

If you are talking about me, I'm interested in the part of Socionics that integrates with other systems I'm interested in , I have nothing to do with ITR and I have no benefit from it on the first place
As for other people , I can't answer for them.

Some go even "wiser" and when (having mistakes in types) notice regular non-matching with IR theory for themselves - they just reject IR theory, pervert it or reduce evaluation of its influence.
Also there are people who assign themselves one type, then another one, etc. This happens for years - when they change opinions and doubt. This time they'd could to direct on typing well-known people and IR checking. And after not so long time of thinking to settle on 1 and good based own type.

Not everyone value Fi to take ITR into account

[Riven]

Alpha 8
Beta 3
Gamma 5
Delta 6

I may be stupid but I don't know the stuff that was said in the items actually reflects "quadra values"
Like are Se/Te valuers just literal assholes who hate any criminals in any situation? I think functions have a "baseline" to the way they present but it can't be translated into such specific social stuff. You can be a good comprehensible person using Se/Te. But your internal reasons for doing so will just be fundamentally different from Ne/Fe.

[kingslayer]

Alpha 6
Beta 5
Gamma 9
Delta 5

[godslave]

Alpha 6
Beta 1
Gamma 0
Delta 6

that test was weird. Who came up with it ? the KGB FSB ??

[Squirrel]

Alpha 6
Beta 1
Gamma 0
Delta 6

that test was weird. Who came up with it ? the KGB FSB ??

Maybe someone who is looking for anybody who disagree with his values ​​to kill him

[godslave]

Maybe someone who is looking for anybody who disagree with his values ​​to kill him

[FaeSoleil]

Alpha 8, Beta 1, Gamma 3, Delta 7. I guess not inaccurate, my own values are pretty Alpha-Delta hybrid - just... looks like this test gives everyone that even Beta and Gamma.

[Beautiful sky]

F4071BEB-4428-4649-975F-5A35F7A112AF.png

[persimmonism]

Gamma 8 > Beta 5 > Delta 4 > Alpha 3

[Salam]

Family-cognitive values ​​of Alpha quadra 6
Romantic-power values ​​of the Beta quadra 2
Liberal-pragmatic values ​​of the Gamma quadra 4
Humane and labor values ​​of quadra Delta 7

[I am a frog]

Alpha- 3
Beta-6
Gamma-6
Delta-2

[lavos]

Alpha 5
Beta 3
Gamma 5
Delta 5

[Ruby13357]

Seems like it's a tie between Alpha and Delta quadra.

Alpha: 5
Beta: 2
Gamma: 2
Delta: 5

[Sisyphean]

Welp

Family-cognitive values ​​of quadra Alpha 1
Romantic-strength values ​​of Quadra Beta 9
Liberal-Pragmatic Values ​​of Quadra Gamma 1
Humane and labor values ​​of quadra Delta 2

[kuno]

Alpha = 11
Beta = 2
Gamma = 1
Delta = 8

Cool test