Is definitely INFJ
She’s so much like myself;
She had difficulty saying no to requests
She’s not able to convey passions but she draws at herself and her insecurities
https://youtu.be/7SUn0l7T2gc
Gisele Bündchen
Is definitely INFJ
She’s so much like myself;
She had difficulty saying no to requests
She’s not able to convey passions but she draws at herself and her insecurities
https://youtu.be/7SUn0l7T2gc
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Interesting. I always thought she is like Fi-creative (IEE), but EII also seems reasonable.
Last edited by Metaphor; 02-14-2023 at 12:21 PM.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: "The history of the world is none other than the progress of the consciousness of freedom."
She seems very down to earth here.Never seen her in an interview before. She does that thing I do—smiles brightly and her eyes look everywhere excitedly as she recalls events/memories she is talking about—which some people called “Ne eyes.” I wonder if that is an Ne thing. I think a lot of people do that.
I can certainly imagine EII, just from this interview!
IEI
my ideas about socionics:
https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/
this is a VI thread with IEI examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)
and this is a thread with EIE examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples
I've seen her being typed as SEI, but I've never analyzed her.
The big thing about her is that she is definitely not able to hypnotize me nor most people with her beauty as should be expected from a top notch model, but her personality is definitely the key factor that makes her so unordinary, and she was a case study about why people are successful (I just don't remember the name of the book). She def. has that "key factor"
So my guess is a feeling type and Ne valuing.
I just can't watch her for more than 3 seconds without getting bored and moving to something else :/
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
She has very strong Fi values observe what she says here
https://youtu.be/SynVdC540nw
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
https://youtu.be/tVGgOvI6gfQ
I relate to this a lot because I am very kissy too
Also she makes everything personal and all about the value of attachment and ethics of relationships like love and bond
https://youtu.be/soWYhevZlds
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 02-14-2023 at 04:29 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
EIE
Nah she displays no FeOriginally Posted by nifl
When and where can you find an example of Fe over Fi
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think people think that Fe is displaying concern, emotions, or being emotional, but people can cry and be sentimental and feel or have feelings. That’s not necessarily Fe. I believe that emotions in Fe and Fi are sharply different but only if I can show you a video and also Fe bays attention to the behaviors of others around them where these behaviors are often lost to Fi types especially when Fi is in their head
Here she displays a lot of values personal to her
https://youtu.be/9BemCDaENvU
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
extravert
Creative subtype with accentuated extroverted functions. I thought EIE a while ago but IEI makes a bit more sense to me now. Beta NF either way.
my ideas about socionics:
https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/
this is a VI thread with IEI examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)
and this is a thread with EIE examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples
ILE was my second thought, not Fi ego
the version was based on non-verbal impressions
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote