Charles is now King

[Eliza Thomason]

You said you didn't understand how part of the prophecy of God could be false. Well, how could part of the prophecy of God be false? It's God's prophecy supposedly. Is God just going to lie through "true" prophets? Why is that what you worship?

That is the thing. The prophecy of God is NOT EVER false. Of that I never have doubt. It only seemed to clash, and in the original 1st half of post #14, I was trying to figure just what I misunderstood. The distinction between king and crown did not occur to me, until I looked it up on Prophecy Index (as explained in the 2nd half of post #14).

Maybe you and others didn't read that closely?

It woud be helpful if I would master communicating more like you, in very short text-like communications, since that is how long the majority of the people want to pay attention.

I love your Edward de Vere quote BTW!

[Eliza Thomason]

"God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it?"

-Numbers 23:19

Amen to that!

I suppose it's possible that if you ignore "God is not a man" and "nor a son of man" you can also ignore the idea that God doesn't lie.

You misunderstood me. I even quoted that Numbers 23:19, as that is the God's honest truth that I would stake my life on.

See post to CB above, and also my post #14 above. Then let me know if you get it? I am asking because you seem more amendable to taking on a post of more than two sentences and reading it for understanding than the average reader. Or maybe I messed up explaining something? Please point it out to me if I did! I am puzzled because I thought I was clear.

[Eliza Thomason]

The Royal family are slightly less annoying than other celebrities. They just seem so ordinary or ridiculous..I hate to admit it but Prince Charles makes me laugh. And I did like Diana. If I paid more attention to them, I'd probably start to get more annoyed as I really can't stand entitled, posh people. They're slightly less dull than British politicians..I don't think ceremonies involving them should be so lavish. They should have a more low-key presence.

Virtual

*Like*

(My *Like* button is still banned).

[Eliza Thomason]

Well, that's clearly just God the Father and maybe God the Holy Spirit (if the last of the three divine people can actually speak or have a mind to begin with.) The second of the three divine people can clearly lie and change his mind all he wants since he's a guy!

Ug. Wow, it is like telephone tag how mixed up things come out.

Just to clarify, the messages Julie Green puts out are from I think always, if not at least most of the time, from "God", "The Lord of Hosts". And I was not dividing up the Trinity in some wonky way when I was trying to figure out the what I misunderstanding in the first half of post #14. Ug.

@FreelancePoliceman, do you see why I am asking for your assistance in determining if I explained myself incorrectly?

[Coeruleum Blue]

Ug. Wow, it is like telephone tag how mixed up things come out.

Just to clarify, the messages Julie Green puts out are from I think always, if not at least most of the time, from "God", "The Lord of Hosts". And I was not dividing up the Trinity in some wonky way when I was trying to figure out the what I misunderstanding in the first half of post #14. Ug.

@FreelancePoliceman, do you see why I am askign for your assistance in determining if I explained myself incorrec tly?

Don't you believe Jesus is God? It even explicitly gives him the title... "Son of Man." So how can you quote Numbers 23:19 as a Christian?

[Eliza Thomason]

Don't you believe Jesus is God? It even explicitly gives him the title... "Son of Man." So how can you quote Numbers 23:19 as a Christian?

Oh, I see what your are saying here. Got it.

But Jesus is unlike every man - the only One conceived of the Holy Spirit, the only begotten Son of God, and He is both fully God and fully man. So, though fully man, He is fully God, and therefore cannot lie.

[Coeruleum Blue]

Oh, I see what your are saying here. Got it.

But Jesus is unlike every man - the only One conceived of the Holy Spirit, the only begotten Son of God, and He is both fully God and fully man. So, though fully man, He is fully God, and therefore cannot lie.

...Well, what about the part where God isn't a human? If Jesus is a human, and God is not a human according to that quote, how can Jesus be God according to the Bible?

[FreelancePoliceman]

Ug. Wow, it is like telephone tag how mixed up things come out.

Just to clarify, the messages Julie Green puts out are from I think always, if not at least most of the time, from "God", "The Lord of Hosts". And I was not dividing up the Trinity in some wonky way when I was trying to figure out the what I misunderstanding in the first half of post #14. Ug.

@FreelancePoliceman, do you see why I am asking for your assistance in determining if I explained myself incorrectly?

As @Coeruleum Blue said, I was just curious why you believe that God can't lie when you already don't believe the Bible when it contradicts the doctrine of the Trinity. The Bible clearly states that God is not a man. It doesn't say "God is a man unlike every other man, conceived of the Holy Spirit, both fully God and fully man." No, it's just "God is not a man" and "God is not a son of man."

[Subteigh]

Oh, I see what your are saying here. Got it.

But Jesus is unlike every man - the only One conceived of the Holy Spirit, the only begotten Son of God, and He is both fully God and fully man. So, though fully man, He is fully God, and therefore cannot lie.

People other than Jesus were said to be "sons of god": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_God
and "sons of man": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_man

including all Israelites.

[Subteigh]

[Subteigh]

[Coeruleum Blue]

As @Coeruleum Blue said, I was just curious why you believe that God can't lie when you already don't believe the Bible when it contradicts the doctrine of the Trinity. The Bible clearly states that God is not a man. It doesn't say "God is a man unlike every other man, conceived of the Holy Spirit, both fully God and fully man." No, it's just "God is not a man" and "God is not a son of man."

No no no, the essence of Godhead is not a man, but the gods... divine persons can be whatever they want!

[Coeruleum Blue]

Remember: God is not one of three. God is one of four! God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit! Three divine persons, one divine essence! Four gods, one God!

"We are monotheists somehow, and we believe the Bible, whatever it might happen to say!" — Christians

[godslave]

Remember: God is not one of three. God is one of four! God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit! Three divine persons, one divine essence! Four gods, one God!

"We are monotheists somehow, and we believe the Bible, whatever it might happen to say!" — Christians

[Coeruleum Blue]

The Legend of Jesus™

[Coeruleum Blue]

And I was not dividing up the Trinity in some wonky way

...As far as I'm concerned, believing in the Trinity is the same as dividing it up in some wonky way. It seems like there's no reason whatsoever to believe in the trinity besides "Look at those happy merchant Jews with all their money!" and "Look at those towel heads oppressing all their female Prime Ministers, Presidents, and queens! We better civilize those savages who invented forks and algebra!" and "You really think humanity is supposed to understand things? Next you'll say humans are supposed to be masters over nature instead of nature ruling over them! Acts of God are acts of nature! Now excuse me while I worship this tree!"

[Too deep]

https://c.tenor.com/5YpnBXYFz-AAAAAC...uaad-shrek.gif

[Bethany]

omg it's like being in an RE lesson that never ends..

[Coeruleum Blue]

omg it's like being in an RE lesson that never ends..

It's over. They've lost. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one God only depending on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. Say that to I Am that I Am.

[Eliza Thomason]

...As far as I'm concerned, believing in the Trinity is the same as dividing it up in some wonky way. It seems like there's no reason whatsoever to believe in the trinity besides "Look at those happy merchant Jews with all their money!" and "Look at those towel heads oppressing all their female Prime Ministers, Presidents, and queens! We better civilize those savages who invented forks and algebra!" and "You really think humanity is supposed to understand things? Next you'll say humans are supposed to be masters over nature instead of nature ruling over them! Acts of God are acts of nature! Now excuse me while I worship this tree!"

So those are your thoughts? Okay. I have a different views.

Sometimes people argue just for the sake of arguing and they really don't care about what the true answer of a thing is. That is what this feels like, and I find that activity boring. I mean it looks as if you are just throwing out the thoughts on your top of your head. Like maybe you are reacting to something not touted in the news, or in your school education experiences, or in Hollywood or elsewhere in the mainstream culture of your experience, so your knee jerk reaction is to ridicule?

Instead for me these things you find mockable go deep. If you don't want to go deep into the essentials questions of life that is your prerogative. Also it is fine with me if you have differnt views from me on what are the essential questions of life.


I predict that something will soon come about to give you hope there IS something more important in life than you've previously presumed there is.

[Eliza Thomason]

People other than Jesus were said to be "sons of god": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_God
and "sons of man": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_man

including all Israelites.

Yes.

It's not always a matter of Either/Or, but many times it is BOTH/AND. Remember?

In this case, both/and = BOTH "sons of God" AND the One, "ONLY begotten Son of God". Jesus is our Lord, and our brother.

Similar to the Both/AND in the Catholic and Orthodox traditions of Saints and saints.

[Eliza Thomason]

As @Coeruleum Blue said, I was just curious why you believe that God can't lie when you already don't believe the Bible when it contradicts the doctrine of the Trinity. The Bible clearly states that God is not a man. It doesn't say "God is a man unlike every other man, conceived of the Holy Spirit, both fully God and fully man." No, it's just "God is not a man" and "God is not a son of man."

God can't lie. The Bible does not contradict the doctrine of the Trinity.

But apparently you hold a different opinion? I reverence your God-given freedom to think through things in your own way.

I don't know if this topic matters to you, but if it does there are many very great minds who have explored it, like St. Augustine, who had many deep and wonderful things to say on the Trinity, as he contemplated it much.
Then one day God had mercy on him and sent him a little boy to enlighten him: https://olmlaycarmelites.org/reflect...ystery-trinity

...........................................

[Eliza Thomason]

omg it's like being in an RE lesson that never ends..

Yes and here I am in the middle of it. RE class is not my intention. I am just answering Q's put to me. But in your opinion, which I am honestly asking for, should I just ignore many of these Q's, which honestly might be statements with Q marks, as it feels unlikely that answers are really wanted. Am I right? What do you think. WWYD?

[Coeruleum Blue]

So those are your thoughts? Okay. I have a different views.

Sometimes people argue just for the sake of arguing and they really don't care about what the true answer of a thing is. That is what this feels like, and I find that activity boring. I mean it looks as if you are just throwing out the thoughts on your top of your head. Like maybe you are reacting to something not touted in the news, or in your school education experiences, or in Hollywood or elsewhere in the mainstream culture of your experience, so your knee jerk reaction is to ridicule?

Instead for me these things you find mockable go deep. If you don't want to go deep into the essentials questions of life that is your prerogative. Also it is fine with me if you have differnt views from me on what are the essential questions of life.


I predict that something will soon come about to give you hope there IS something more important in life than you've previously presumed there is.

I apologize. I'm not trying to mock your beliefs or you. I just get endlessly frustrated feeling like I should believe the trinity, but there's no reason to that I can see.

That being said, I believe in God. Not everyone who believes in God believes God is three people.

[Eliza Thomason]

I apologize. I'm not trying to mock your beliefs or you. I just get endlessly frustrated feeling like I should believe the trinity, but there's no reason to that I can see.

That being said, I believe in God. Not everyone who believes in God believes God is three people.

*Like*

[Eliza Thomason]

I apologize. I'm not trying to mock your beliefs or you. I just get endlessly frustrated feeling like I should believe the trinity, but there's no reason to that I can see.

That being said, I believe in God. Not everyone who believes in God believes God is three people.

Thank you for explaining! I see now it was frustration not mocking.

Well at the risk of teaching RE, I will just say I love The Baltimore Catechism for the short version of who God is and the purpose of our life. The link is there is you want to see. (But Holy Trinity is explained simply!)

I am so glad you believe in God. Truly we all know Him in our hearts.

It was also St. Augustine who said, “You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you.”

[Coeruleum Blue]

Thank you for explaining! I see now it was frustration not mocking.

Well at the risk of teaching RE, I will just say I love The Baltimore Catechism for the short version of who God is and the purpose of our life. The link is there is you want to see. (But Holy Trinity is explained simply!)

I am so glad you believe in God. Truly we all know Him in our hearts.

It was also St. Augustine who said, “You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you.”

If there isn't a real rational explanation for something, I'm not inclined to believe it. However, I do think there's a rational justification of God. I don't really have an interest in Catholicism myself, and I'm extremely unlikely to convert to that. So don't look at this as I'm seeking to become Catholic. I'm just seeking where these theologians are that Catholics use to justify their beliefs. That's just sort of frustrating me. Aquinas seems like a poor man's al-Ghazali, and Augustine a poor man's Aristotle. I still apologize for my harshness. I'm not trying to be mean to you personally. I'm just so tired of hearing I should believe these things and not seeing a reason for them. At the risk of just alienating everyone, I see God and I see eternity, but it's like those gestalt psychology contour images, God isn't embodied and concepts like eternity and infinity certainly aren't so I see them as like contours to everything else. When I see something myself, how can I infer God's actually a man and two other people contrary to my perceptions? I'm aggravated, but it's not personal towards you or your beliefs whatsoever, it just feels like what people keep promising me is completely empty and breaks into a hundred-thousand pieces as soon as it's made. Then I have to ask, why?