Originally Posted by
Indigo
"I match with some rational key elements: wants to be prepared, always tense and not spontaneous, but I'm moody and my emotions change easily."
Possibly Normalizing subtype by DCNH but seems irrational enough.
"Both ILI and LII Buskova descriptions describe me well, but I'm much more emotional and sensitive. I'm polite as LII but quite good at reading others intentions and emotions and I can easily predict how situations will evolve. I strive to be polite and I'm the nicer person you'll meet if you are honest and nice too."
This doesn't seem the key element of Ni+ in Model G, process Introverted Intuition seems likely or Ni-.
"But if I sense some sort of mannerisms/fake flattery, I'll become suspicious.
I can see myself being Fe Polr, but only on the fact that I can't stand dishonesty or exaggerated display emotions."
Possibly accentuated Fe by contact/inert subtype or ILI-Ni.
"I feel a lot of anger inside, but I don't show it. Only those near to me know my grumpier moodier side, but it's quite easy to lift up my mood- just leave me alone for a bit and treat me nicely."
Doesn't seem Fe suggestive despite LII is more than able to have a poker face in front of everyone yet deep down, they want to be entertained by Alpha SF, esp. ESE.
"I can't stand illogical people and I'm annoyed when people don't understand what I'm trying to explain. But I'm quite good at wording my thoughts and I have a good dictionary, some described me pedantic in my younger years."
High usage of Ti, possibly unvalued.
"I don't directly say to people "your opinion is wrong and your dumb". I may think it, but I'll say "what you are saying it's wrong and this is why...", omitting the confrontational attack (more LII than ILI). But I can easily get confrontational if someone tries to limit my freedom or is plainly rude."
Confrontational attack as a sign of Se-value rather than Fe. Inclined to be Constructive than Emotive according to Reinin, seems Objectivist as well.
"For example, I have a group of friends that has a certain hierarchy and everyone has a certain role, based also on their gender. And I hate it and in these situations I can be much more blunt and assertive than in other situations, because I feel constricted. I tend to get angry easily and I hate when people don't listen to me. I can be also really judgmental when people act inconsiderately or badly/impolitely." Fi-value, possibly Fi+.
"I'm really anxious and I wait a lot before taking action, but I'm not passive as ILI is often depicted as and I value a lot facts and proofs, unlike LII. I also think that money are necessary and in my future I'd like to have a profitable career." Indecisiveness can happen to anyone but in Ni as a base function, they succumb themselves in making a decision when the pressure keeps coming or there are too many variables to do with their own life choice, which might be tricky to say the least.
"And I'd say that I'm highly attentive of my hygiene and my look and I care about being well dressed, it's fundamental for feeling adequate when I'm outside."
Again, probably Normalizing subtype.
"I'd also add that I'm really curious and I like novelty, unlike ILI, since I've read that ILI tends to stay on a single path and devalues Ne."
This is a misconception, novelty is related to Ni, not Ne. What really Ne into is the perspective or the development of objects at the moment.
"When I look at model G I can see myself relate to ILI, but this doesn't happen if I consider model A. My general issue is related to the fact that I find descriptions of the types and the subtypes to be too categorical."
I wouldn't suggest of using subtypes as the starter, seems to be a common mistake, especially for the new learner of Socionics
While some type descriptions can't be said to be reliable.
"I'm surely a negativist and I see myself as a strategic, but the rest is just a great confusion."
Not really indicating anything.
'
Help with typing
Reply With Quote
