Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Rate how good each subtype is with computers

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    XSI-Ji 146w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    674
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Rate how good each subtype is with computers

    Ile ti and Ili te 10
    ile ne, Ili ni, Lii ne, LSI se, sli si 9
    lii ti, sle ti, iei ni, Iee fi, sli te 8
    lie ni, lie te, Lse si, lse te, Eie fe, Esi se, esi fi 7
    lsi ti, eie ni, sle se, Eii fi, iei fe, see se, see fi, ese fe, sei fe 6
    sei si ese si, Iee ne, Eii ne 4

    in my experience, ile ti and Ili te tend to be the very best with computers, although Ili seem to favor simplicity a bit more. You rarely ever run into one that needs to be taught how to use them or that makes many mistakes with them. Lsi ti, sle ti, Esi se vary a lot, but lsi ti females tend to be poor with them while lsi ti males spend a lot of time with them… lsi ti follow gender norms too much, lsi se are more open minded. Surprisingly, my eie ni niece was better with computers than my sle ti niece, that was how it started off. I think my sle ti niece surpassed my Eie ni one though, because my eie ni niece just didn’t really care about computers. But if eie ni want do better with computers than sle ti then some of them can, just they likely wouldn’t care to. For some reason, Eie ni who are into computers see more wrong with certain things so they tend to try to learn more options than sle ti do.
    I'm not only psychologically disturbed, I'm also QueeferSutherlandJeffersonianSecessionist87@sucksd ick.com


  2. #2
    The Morning Star EUDAEMONIUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    gone
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,131
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Te Creative and both 4d Ne Te types are the best troubleshooters. We don't have to drag Te PoLRs into this, do we?
    The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.

    The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".

  3. #3
    Dreymagine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    TIM
    EII-Fi 614
    Posts
    319
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Today, my comp professor spent half an hour teaching us how to wrap text around a picture in a Word doc. And then, she spent the remainder of the class period teaching us how to use the infographic templates on a site called Vennpage. I hadn't even heard of the latter before, but it was so intuitive that she could've just dropped the website name and let us figure it out ourselves; it would've been faster that way.

    I think older educators tend to wildly overestimate how much instruction my generation requires to complete digital tasks..

    The story wasn't related to subtypes lol, but this thread reminded me of it.

  4. #4
    Seed my wickedness Sanguine Miasma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    7,564
    Mentioned
    321 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm famous at finding my way around. Dialectical Algorithmic types should fare well? Troubleshooting through if-then-else operations. Fast cancellation of various options.
    The essential distinguishing feature of the Dialectical style, is a view of the universe as a unified struggle of opposites. In speech it often uses syntactic constructions "if-then-else", the predictive branches of a developing process. Within limits, the Dialectic strives to find an intermediate point of dynamic equilibrium between contrasting extremes. Dialectical cognition is born from the colliding flow and counterflow of thought, the consciousness and unconsciousness. Thinkers of this style are characterized by an express inclination towards the synthesis of opposites, the removal of contradictions, which they so keenly perceive.

    Its advantages are obvious: it is the most subtle and flexible style. It can easily switch to an opposite direction, and possesses predictive ability, accompanied by an effective type of associative memory. Algorithmic thinking is also good at solving problems of classification, given their gift for recognizing complex patterns. Beyond the circumstantial conditions of a problem, it perceives a fundamental algorithm for its solution.


    Flowing structures:
    Dialectical Algorithmic > Vortical Synergetic > Causal deterministic > Holographic Panoramic

    Discrete Configurations:
    Causal deterministic -> Holographic Panoramic > Dialectical Algorithmic > Vortical Synergetic
    Last edited by Sanguine Miasma; 04-23-2022 at 03:44 AM.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •