Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Types that do the highest and lowest quality work

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    XSI-Ji 146w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    674
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Types that do the highest and lowest quality work

    Please include subtype.

    by quality, I mean durability, originality, low error rate, beauty, low bad future outcomes, high effectiveness, all problems solved, no new ones created, doing things no one else is doing and other things that could be considered quality. But depending on work done, it doesn’t have to include any of those things, e.g., administrative work obviously wouldn’t include durability, because administrative work is a service. Acting wouldn’t include durability either.

    For highest quality, I would say Ile ti then delta irrationals, Esi se, SEE both subtypes and Lsi se, then iei ni then Sle ti tied with ili te. Lowest quality I would say Eie ni then lie ni. Some lsi ti do good work, but not very often. Some LSe also do good work.

    statics tend to do better quality work than dynamics, statics seem more original, their work seems less derivative.
    I'm not only psychologically disturbed, I'm also QueeferSutherlandJeffersonianSecessionist87@sucksd ick.com


  2. #2
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,960
    Mentioned
    669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don’t think this is type related. You could have someone at their job who is passionate in their work who does a great job but someone else who does the work for a paycheck who then goes home and builds a really great motorcycle lol
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  3. #3
    twiggewed dewusional entitwed snowfwake VewyScawwyNawcissist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    uNdeR yOur SkIn
    TIM
    bNF 6w521 sx/sp VELF
    Posts
    2,354
    Mentioned
    106 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    EIE was asked to review a software and say 5 things to be improved
    he went on to make a presentation about 15 things bc the software was so shitty
    got hired, he has a very strong work ethic and high performance. he is being exploited for his wage. ppl like him dont get promoted. his position is so weird hes like a manager/mediator on top of some menial labor but hes on the bottom of the hierarchy

    an EII told me his animation students, the one who excel and have consistently impressed him the most are LIEs then ILIs
    Your face makes your brain and sociotype – how muscle use shapes personality
    I want to care
    if I was better I’d help you
    if I was better you’d be better
    HELLO??? COME BACK!!!!
    i'm afraid it will hurt like hell, i am afraid of screaming and i am afraid of crying, i am afraid of forgetting but i'm not afraid of dying.



  4. #4
    The Morning Star EUDAEMONIUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    gone
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,131
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Who does the best work? Your dual

    Who does the worst? Your conflictor
    The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.

    The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Land of The Free
    TIM
    ILI-DC™
    Posts
    555
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Highest quality work would probably go to LSI-D and LSI-N. Lowest quality would probably go to IEI-H or SEI-H.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •