I was looking at some comments at the bottom of the following article about socionics erotic attitudes.
Olimpia makes the following comments:
'Someone's subtype influences how much they may lean to the other fellow dynamic or static type.
In that manner, all Aggressors have a Childlike side and vice versa, and all Victims have a Caretaker side and vice versa.
How much this "comes out" or is present in the person depends on the subtype.
(For example, SEE-Fi and SLE-Ti are a bit more Childlike, IEE-Fi and ILE-Ti are a bit more Aggressor, etc.)
Still, the main style mostly prevails, and at the very least becomes apparent on a closer basis.
Most people's romance style behaviour is unconscious, they do not act this way deliberately. Once you deliberately choose to act in a certain way, like acting more coy or aggressive because you get the impression the other person would like that more, you are not acting according to your natural romance style.'
She seems to be saying that some people's romance style can be a 'mix' of two romance styles, if they are a particular subtype.
This got me thinking about people I've been attracted to and whether they may have a subtype/ mix of romance styles. I thought it might explain a little why I was attracted to them. For example an IEE-fi might be appealing to me because they might act a little like an SEE and have a bit of aggressor in their romance style.
This also got me thinking about the romance styles of my family members and how maybe I'm drawn to people with a similar style, for some sort of attachment reason. But I can't figure out my parents subtypes :/