I think the guy is ESI. Surprisingly, a lot of ESIs work hard in the sciences and are pretty good at Te.
He is giving a very detailed explanation of the things right in front of him. What I do not see is the rolling persuasion that is characteristic of LIEs. An LIE would be rolling up towards the course of action that he wants his audience to undertake.
This guy is entirely about "This happened, and then this happened, and this is the situation, and this happened in the past, and this is what we saw." Nothing about "This is the situation, and because of X, we can exploit the enemy's Y to accomplish Z if we do not hesitate to act now."
As for you not seeing "value judgement", he isn't giving his opinion about what should be done in a tactical or a strategic sense, because ESIs can tell you everything there is to know about what happened and what is happening, including what is impossible, but they won't tell you what the best course of action should be, because they don't know.
He actually does express his value judgement subtly in the video when he shows the video of the Ukrainians singing the national anthem in a group, just before they launched the latest offensive. The scene has almost religious overtones, and as we know, the HA of an ESI is "to believe". If that isn't showing which set of values he has, then I don't know what is.
If you want to see Te in a war blogger (no Ni, though), there is Jake Broe, LSE extraordinaire. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEnPUJLNgRk
And here is Ti in a war blogger, in Denys Davydov, LII. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2tGHqq_Dlo
If you want Fe-PoLR*, you could watch the SLI, Operator Starsky, in his regular reports on Ukraine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l3bP8xaLPQ, and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYKTZs7_L8E
*An easy way to recognize Fe-PoLR is to watch for a comment from them that says "You are so fucking stupid." (ILIs can do this, too.)



Reply With Quote