Results 1 to 33 of 33

Thread: FHM's 100 sexiest women

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default FHM's 100 sexiest women

    Go through this gallery and post which women you like (top 5). Take note I will be trying to type the women and drawing correlations with your type (and comparing with mine).

  2. #2
    Ding dong your opinion is wrong Teslobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    TIM
    LSI
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Indiatimes.com is the sexiest woman

  3. #3

    Default

    gimme the poosy baus
    how to enlarge your dragon, click here

  4. #4
    The Evening and the Morning Star Eudaimonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Jet Stream
    TIM
    ****
    Posts
    2,621
    Mentioned
    132 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Number 1:



    2: Lisa



    3: Charli XCX



    4: Amber Heard



    5: Megan Thee Stallion



  5. #5
    inaLim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    369
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Natalie Dormer



    Rachel Riley


    Cara Delevingne



    Jennifer Lawrence






    Jennifer Lopez

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @inaLim, what's your self-typing? I guess you are either LIE or ILE based on your first two choices (SEI-Fe and ESI-Se)

  7. #7
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    13,632
    Mentioned
    1339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm out of picture space on the forum, so I'll have to just list the women.
    Disclaimer: My choices are based entirely on the pictures presented on the website. I have no idea if the women look like that in other pictures.


    Maybe the best: #91 Kat Demmings - ESI-Fi Definitely has a resting bitch face.

    Second best: #11 Keeley Hazell - ESI She looks almost exactly like my last ESI GF, even to the oversized boobs and thin legs.

    Third choice: #69 Rose Byrne - ESI-Fi Looks like she would travel well.

    Fourth choice: #41 Louise Thompson - ESI-Fi or EII-Fi, hard to tell. I see her and get Caregiver feelings. Maybe not the best.

    Fifth choice: #98 Emma Rigby - ESI All around nice, but can't tell how smart she is.


    I feel like I can accurately VI about 80% of the women on that site.

  8. #8
    chriscorey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    TIM
    ILE-pars pro toto
    Posts
    3,473
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Penelope Cruz


  9. #9
    Anglas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Lithuania
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 7w8 So/Sp
    Posts
    1,536
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    99. Jessie J
    94. Hannah Davis
    37. Laura Whitmore
    44. Mila Kunis
    5. Caroline Flack

  10. #10
    kingslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    SLE Sx/Sp
    Posts
    705
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    5th Choice Rachel Steven


    4th Choice Charlotte McKinney


    3rd Choice Beyonce


    2nd Choice Georgia Salpa


    1st Choice Sofia Vergara



  11. #11

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was hesitant, but here are mine. I am assuming here sexual "like" attraction; there were other women I liked but felt were better suited as friends so I didn't add them.

    1- Cheryl Fernandez-Versini (IEI-Ni?)


    2- Daisy Lowe (ILE-Ne)


    3- Louise Thomson (prob SLE-Se)



    4- Daisy Pettinger (ESI-Fi)




    5- Pixie Lott (SEI-Si)







    I'm wondering if being able to VI people and know their type affects if you like somebody or not, or it is independent. I've noticed it is too common that people are attracted (especially people who don't know socionics) to their conflictors. Know a lot of conflictors pairings and people who have had a conflictor as a partner sometime in their lives. It's messed up. Is it normal, or these people subconsciously want to be unhappy?

  12. #12
    Fay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Europe
    TIM
    NF
    Posts
    1,283
    Mentioned
    161 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What about making a thread about 100 most intelligent women? Or most powerful women? Most successful women? That would be much less misogynistic and sexist.


  13. #13
    Fay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Europe
    TIM
    NF
    Posts
    1,283
    Mentioned
    161 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    I'm out of picture space on the forum, so I'll have to just list the women.
    Disclaimer: My choices are based entirely on the pictures presented on the website. I have no idea if the women look like that in other pictures.


    Maybe the best: #91 Kat Demmings - ESI-Fi Definitely has a resting bitch face.

    Second best: #11 Keeley Hazell - ESI She looks almost exactly like my last ESI GF, even to the oversized boobs and thin legs.

    Third choice: #69 Rose Byrne - ESI-Fi Looks like she would travel well.

    Fourth choice: #41 Louise Thompson - ESI-Fi or EII-Fi, hard to tell. I see her and get Caregiver feelings. Maybe not the best.

    Fifth choice: #98 Emma Rigby - ESI All around nice, but can't tell how smart she is.


    I feel like I can accurately VI about 80% of the women on that site.
    Do you type every woman you're attracted to an ESI or are all the women you find attractive ESIs, because women who don't represent a possibility of a relationship (duality) for you have now value to you?


  14. #14
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    13,632
    Mentioned
    1339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fay View Post
    Do you type every woman you're attracted to an ESI or are all the women you find attractive ESIs, because women who don't represent a possibility of a relationship (duality) for you have now value to you?
    @Fay, more the latter, but not entirely the latter. There were lots of beautiful women on that list, but most of them were not Duals. And weirdly enough, the Duals were the only ones that I thought didn't have obvious problems. Psychological difference problems, that is.

    I actually thought that #10 Kelly Brook was quite beautiful, but I think she's an LIE, and while I get along really well with female LIEs, I was answering the question (which was not asked) of "Which of these women would you date?" And to "date" someone, I need to feel an attraction to them.

    Truthfully, I don't let myself be attracted to non-Duals anymore. I actually think that #55 Olivia Wilde is hot, but I also think she could be LSI, and so she's off limits until I get more information. And I think that #52 Sam Faiers might be ESI, but she looks exactly like the little sister of my next door neighbor buddy when I was ten years old, and she was a little pain in the ass. Lol. Can't get away from those associations.

    In any case, how many times do you have to get burned before you stop doing the same things over and over again? I've dated a lot of women with usually poor results. I've had good relations with ESIs so far, with the caveat that they don't warm up to me very fast and a lot of them have Attachment issues. But being slow to warm up might be a good thing.

    The problems I've had with other sociotypes were the exact problems predicted by Socionics.

  15. #15
    Fay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Europe
    TIM
    NF
    Posts
    1,283
    Mentioned
    161 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    @Fay, more the latter, but not entirely the latter. There were lots of beautiful women on that list, but most of them were not Duals. And weirdly enough, the Duals were the only ones that I thought didn't have obvious problems. Psychological difference problems, that is.

    I actually thought that #10 Kelly Brook was quite beautiful, but I think she's an LIE, and while I get along really well with female LIEs, I was answering the question (which was not asked) of "Which of these women would you date?" And to "date" someone, I need to feel an attraction to them.

    Truthfully, I don't let myself be attracted to non-Duals anymore. I actually think that #55 Olivia Wilde is hot, but I also think she could be LSI, and so she's off limits until I get more information.

    Really, how many times do you have to get burned before you stop doing the same things over and over again? I've had good relations with ESIs so far, with the caveat that they don't warm up to me very fast and a lot of them have Attachment issues. But being slow to warm up might be a good thing.

    The problems I've had with other sociotypes were the exact problems predicted by Socionics.
    Well, you won't actually ever meet any of these women, you also won't ever be able to have an actual relationship with them, so why bother with duality?


  16. #16
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    13,632
    Mentioned
    1339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fay View Post
    Well, you won't actually ever meet any of these women, you also won't ever be able to have an actual relationship with them, so why bother with duality?

    You mean, "Why did I choose only Duals, when I thought some of those women were not Duals and were quite beautiful?" Lol. Because I was answering the wrong question.

    Yeah. In fairness, I do find Duals attractive, now that I know where a relationship with a Dual can lead. I also find LSIs attractive, and EIEs, and SEIs, but with those types, I hang back because I foresee disaster.

    My dates with IEIs, who can be quite beautiful, have been like trying to hold onto water in my hands. Just too much Ni. Plus, I have to turn off my Te to keep from hurting them, and that's really hard to do.

    I also find ILI and LIE women attractive, but I feel kind of pervy when I look at them. I'm not sure why. Maybe because I'm thinking "I just want to use you for a while, and then we can go back to cracking jokes about stupid people."
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 12-08-2021 at 07:12 PM.

  17. #17
    inaLim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    369
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roger557 View Post
    @inaLim, what's your self-typing? I guess you are either LIE or ILE based on your first two choices (SEI-Fe and ESI-Se)
    SLE

    If I weren't using that list, Dormer would've still been top 5, but my #1 would've been Antonia Thomas.




    Out of EII conflictors, Elizabeth Olsen.

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fay View Post
    What about making a thread about 100 most intelligent women? Or most powerful women? Most successful women? That would be much less misogynistic and sexist.
    Not seeing any sexism or mysoginia in this thread. In fact, I did it also as an exercise to see if I can like women again since I've grown to dislike them as a group due to some bad experiences I've had. Took me a while to "tune" to which women I liked since I sort of had that evaluatory aspect "disconnected" or smh.

  19. #19
    ⊱⋆painting the roses red⋆⊰ reverie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI~N
    Posts
    2,742
    Mentioned
    494 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gal Gadot

    girl crush!!!
    ·:*¨༺༻¨*:·.𝓽𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓻·:*¨༺ ༻¨*:·.
    քɨռȶɛʀɛֆȶ
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  20. #20
    FreelancePoliceman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,001
    Mentioned
    364 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1. Pixie Lott


    2. Margot Robbie



    3. Rachel Riley



    4. Daisy Pettinger


    5. Jourdan Dunn



    I didn't know who most of the people on the list were, so I looked at other pictures and videos to compare -- I didn't just use these photos. Also, I haven't put these in any rank.
    φιλοκαλοῦμέν τε γὰρ μετ᾽ εὐτελείας καὶ φιλοσοφοῦμεν ἄνευ μαλακίας...

    I've been busy, so if I don't respond to something, feel free to ping me every day or so until I do.

  21. #21
    Shazaam's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lamp
    TIM
    AB-IEI-Ni
    Posts
    13,019
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    lmao this other gay guy I know calls FHM 'For Heterosexual Morons.'

    Obviously I'm bad at this game, and I'm too gay to play it. No offense to anybody but the female form looks like an alien to me- like it's some out of space creature that's not meant for humans to fuck. I agree with kingslayer's choices though over-all, and I like Scarlet Johansson. I guess that is what the 'straight me' would pick lol. Other than that I just see aliens or campy demons I say bitchy things to. =/ lol

  22. #22

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reverie View Post
    Gal Gadot

    girl crush!!!
    Your conflictor probably ()

  23. #23
    ⊱⋆painting the roses red⋆⊰ reverie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI~N
    Posts
    2,742
    Mentioned
    494 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roger557 View Post
    Your conflictor probably ()
    LOL

    wouldn’t that be unfortunate

    well in reveries world, she isn’t
    ·:*¨༺༻¨*:·.𝓽𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓻·:*¨༺ ༻¨*:·.
    քɨռȶɛʀɛֆȶ
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  24. #24
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    13,632
    Mentioned
    1339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gal Gadot is married to a guy who looks SLI.

  25. #25

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reverie View Post
    LOL

    wouldn’t that be unfortunate

    well in reveries world, she isn’t
    It's no problem. Look at this pair of conflictors.


  26. #26
    thistle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    463
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ever since I saw her in The Devil Wears Prada I've found Emily Blunt attractive. In interviews she seems extroverted, but in another thread here I saw LSI typing for her.



    Swoon

  27. #27
    ⊱⋆painting the roses red⋆⊰ reverie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI~N
    Posts
    2,742
    Mentioned
    494 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    Gal Gadot is married to a guy who looks SLI.
    She usually gets typed IEE, doesn’t she? I have no clue, personally. Don’t know much about her, but she looks ethical def.

    it’s ok, if we are conflictors, though

    I doubt we ever make it to marriage
    ·:*¨༺༻¨*:·.𝓽𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓻·:*¨༺ ༻¨*:·.
    քɨռȶɛʀɛֆȶ
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  28. #28
    AWellArmedCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Northern Japan
    TIM
    IEI-Fe (C) 4w3 so/sx
    Posts
    550
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fay View Post
    What about making a thread about 100 most intelligent women? Or most powerful women? Most successful women? That would be much less misogynistic and sexist.
    I think the purpose is to determine if there's any correlation between which women you're attracted to, your own self-identified type, and the VI-determined type of these women. I don't think I see how this is misogynistic or sexist. It's a rather interesting question. Granted, the methodology is probably not solid enough to get anything too useful out of it, but it's still fun to take a stab at the question. I mean, I wouldn't complain if you started a thread about the 100 sexiest men. That wouldn't come across as particularly sexist or misandristic to me
    猫が生き甲斐

  29. #29
    AWellArmedCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Northern Japan
    TIM
    IEI-Fe (C) 4w3 so/sx
    Posts
    550
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roger557 View Post
    Go through this gallery and post which women you like (top 5). Take note I will be trying to type the women and drawing correlations with your type (and comparing with mine).
    In choosing, should I only choose based off of the photos included in the gallery you linked, or should I include my outside impressions of these women as well? Some of the pictures in the gallery don't feel representative of how they look in other photos/videos/movies/etc. For example, Pixie Lott's photo in this gallery is quite attractive to me, but I don't remember her standing out to me before seeing that particular pic, and in looking at other images on Google I don't feel quite so attracted to her. Is it better to only use the pics provided, or should I reference others too?
    猫が生き甲斐

  30. #30

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AWellArmedCat View Post
    In choosing, should I only choose based off of the photos included in the gallery you linked, or should I include my outside impressions of these women as well? Some of the pictures in the gallery don't feel representative of how they look in other photos/videos/movies/etc. For example, Pixie Lott's photo in this gallery is quite attractive to me, but I don't remember her standing out to me before seeing that particular pic, and in looking at other images on Google I don't feel quite so attracted to her. Is it better to only use the pics provided, or should I reference others too?
    Well, I looked at other pictures of the woman in question to see if I really liked her, but finally I went with only the representation on this gallery. Tbh, I don't really like much any of these women, even if they are "top sexiest women" according to some magazine or w/e (I'm a demi-sexual). I would probably not engage them, even if "tuning to" whatever that measures a person's attractiveness gave me a positive feedback. Just do it however you like but please state it.

  31. #31

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AWellArmedCat View Post
    I think the purpose is to determine if there's any correlation between which women you're attracted to, your own self-identified type, and the VI-determined type of these women. I don't think I see how this is misogynistic or sexist. It's a rather interesting question. Granted, the methodology is probably not solid enough to get anything too useful out of it, but it's still fun to take a stab at the question. I mean, I wouldn't complain if you started a thread about the 100 sexiest men. That wouldn't come across as particularly sexist or misandristic to me
    Yes, that is one of the objetives of this. It works better if the one doing it doesn't try to VI the women and just goes with whicever he "likes" as a first reaction. IT happened the opposite to me for one of the women, I noticed Rachel Riley VI's like ESI-Se and thought "nice, an ESI-SE, I have to include her on my list" but then I focused a bit more on whether I "liked" her not, and noticed I didin't really like her despite being ESI-Se (maybe because she is So/sp, or something else, or simply "like/dislike" for me is an unsconscious thing that who knows how it works (because I don't know how it works).

  32. #32

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thistle View Post
    Ever since I saw her in The Devil Wears Prada I've found Emily Blunt attractive. In interviews she seems extroverted, but in another thread here I saw LSI typing for her.



    Swoon

    I think she is EII-Ne.

    Quote Originally Posted by reverie View Post
    She usually gets typed IEE, doesn’t she? I have no clue, personally. Don’t know much about her, but she looks ethical def.
    Too much Se. LSE-Si is probably it.

  33. #33

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    978
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm also trying to determine what IM element people use when they determine if they "like" someone, such as -Ne/+Ni ("VI") intutition or concretely/materially perceiving the attractiveness of a person according to physical quqalities (more -Se/+Si based) or how it works exactly. For the moment, it seems people are not always (as I already suspected) to their duals or activity's primarily, so I wonder what is the real use of socionics, when you are going to like more a supervisee, or even a conflictor, than your dual or activity.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •