1. Ne PoLR types
2. Enneagram sixes
Types of people that are a danger to typology communities
1. Ne PoLR types
2. Enneagram sixes
Yup, I sure am a menace.
Lol why enneagram 6?
Chronic "grass is always greener" syndrome
Both are a danger because often they are unable to type themselves correctly. E6's are out of touch with their thoughts to the point that they can become cult-meat. Ne PoLR's have difficulty apprehending the essence of something, that includes themselves, so they will often struggle to type themselves or mistype.Originally Posted by Luna Lovegood
I've studied and observed myself and others to confidently say my typing is correct. The only thing I'm iffy about is my enneagram instinct stacking. Just to let you know.
I think Ne polrs have difficulty handling too much chaotic randomness. I don't think they're any worse at seeing/understanding themselves. As for E6s - the main issue there is seeing contradictory information about themselves and so finding it hard to box in on one thing. I don't think either are a "danger"
And image triad e2,e3,e4.
"Danger" is a bit much
4's hardly, since they are the most self-aware type.
I am a scary 6 Ooooooo! Fear meeeeee!
4s are notorious for mistyping as introverts/IEI.
You mean other people mistyping them? Sure.
thank you I needed another excuse to yell at Ne polrs.
I have heard of concentration camps consisting of PersonalityCafe members. I think the special snowflake syndrome aka being typed as INFJ is the cause.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
Seems to be a common (mis)typing among people who have read some mbti. I've met 2 people irl who said they were infj. They were LSE and SEI.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
It's not this simple. You need to look at environmental factors that can affect mistyping.
Also there are many misconceptions regarding what the IEs actually mean/are referring to
Also NE is about potential, not certainty. NE polr is more likely to look at certainty, since they don't like looking at potential....so don't expect someone to be sure of their type just because they have strong NE.... and don't expect someone to be unaware of their type just because they have weak NE.
It's not going to be any harder for someone with NE polr to realize that they don't like looking at potentials, than it is for someone with strong NE to realize that they do like looking at potentials
Last edited by rtht; 10-11-2021 at 09:28 AM. Reason: spelling
Whatever type Gulenko is.
You should look at reddit r/infj........ just saying. I cant go on reddit mbti forums anymore lol
Im #triggered
I won’t say anything more so I won’t go on a rant LOL
Seriously
@roger557 is a danger to the typology community.
If the definition of typology remains limited to the study or systematic classification of types that have characteristics or traits in common then no type can ever be a danger. When the definition incorporates a specific doctrine (model?) of types, then science is often transformed into something like scriptural studies, where all outside opinions are dangers to the “bible-thumpers” who prefer to limit conversation to specific agendas. On average, NT-types tend to operate outside the box more than other types – except when they're in control of the box.
a.k.a. I/O
The roger polemics episode 10: the phantom menace :)
A danger to typology communities seems to me to be people who don't draw a line between between typology and bias, prediction and prejudice, theoretical model and reality. NTR
This. Exactly this. You articulated it better than I was about to.
Anyone making youtube videos about typology.
The point of typology is to categorize people, and socionics in particular, even to try to predict the tonality of the relation of people in interaction with other people. No point wasting time with these theories if you don't accept that this is the use that these theory have. Most I see in this thread are a bunch of triggered sixes because they know I'm right that they are a danger to typology.
This forum only exists because of me. Ten-ish years ago, it nearly went offline. But I was the one who bought it (and later sold it) in the nick of time.
This forum is now ground zero for people being introduced to Socionics. Think about that: Socionics, a theory that revolutionizes our understanding of the human mind and society (for the rest of human history—perhaps tens of millions of years or more) was saved by yours truly. That makes me the most important human being to ever live. Yup! More important than Aushra herself.
Thank you...
@xerx is a hero to this forum
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
