Adventures in Dating

[godslave]

Would be interesting to see later your types sorting by IR effects of updated list, when I'll do it.
Recent LSE and ESE examples you could notice there. In case to suppose T and LII as closest such option to EII, and mentioned ESE among favs.

Yes, I've seen them (and I just did it again !). I prefer the LSE, I think my ideal cowgirl must be LSE ahah !

[nifl]

@godslave
i'd be surprised if you weren't NF. you have a consistently cute style and a complex inclination, whereas ST speech is on the other hand rather mundane compared to yours.

[Expansion]

What about SF for GS? Like ESI.

Complex speech and metaphor indicates abstraction but not ideation. Leading up to ideas is not the same as starting with ideas.

Just pay attention to intuitive types here and S types and see if you can tell what is N in there. Everyone uses N, but where is it at? At the end or beginning?

[godslave]

@godslave
i'd be surprised if you weren't NF. you have a consistently cute style and a complex inclination, whereas ST speech is on the other hand rather mundane compared to yours.

Thank you for your kind words ! NF mb

[godslave]

What about SF for GS? Like ESI.

Complex speech and metaphor indicates abstraction but not ideation. Leading up to ideas is not the same as starting with ideas.

Just pay attention to intuitive types here and S types and see if you tell what is N in there. Everyone uses N, but where is it at? At the end or beginning?

That's a very interesting and rather original (at least to me) distinction. Perfect for a philosophical debate !

[laurenewison]

Love the idea of sharing dating experiences! Dating truly is a mix of the good, the bad, and the downright unexpected.
I remember a hilarious matchmaking mishap. I connected with someone online, thinking we had similar interests. Turns out, their version of "hiking" was a leisurely stroll, while mine was scaling mountains! We laughed about it, but it was a reminder that even with shared goals, there's always room for surprises.
Speaking of dating journeys, this international matchmaking service might resonate. They specialize in helping folks find that special someone who truly aligns with their aspirations.

[The Banana King]

Thanks for the replies, guys, and sorry for the late response!

Congrats *confetti pops out*

I know this is a happy moment for you but I really felt called to say this. Take it with a grain of salt, I don't know the gal neither do I know you. But the quickest way to get to know somebody is to live with them. They may seem nice, and maybe they are, but are you able to live with them? Deal with their antics and habits? What if she picks her nose and rubs boogers across the walls?

Not only that but don't get used. No one ever does it for love, especially not women. Most of the time it's for a place to stay or financial help. That pussy may make you feel high on heaven but that high will eventually wear down. :///

Absolutely, you're right. It's just that it's pretty rare for me to have such good psychological compatibility with someone. We both seem to soothe each other in a way that never really happened to me before. Can't quite explain it, but I always felt "on edge" in my previous relationships. She's naturally very trusting and honest about her feelings and I find that reassuring somehow.

I hope you're correct. However, like I've said before, socionics type is ultimately an incidental/tertiary concern. What matters most in this regard (and indeed in anything involving interpersonal relationships) is attachment. Have you discussed your long term life goals with her? Has she shared hers with you? Do they match up?

How about core principles? Like, what are the 3-4 cardinal virtues you'd tell God you're all about? (e.g. Mine are Faith, Loyalty, and Courage and that manifests itself pretty obviously in all I say and do) What are yours and what are hers? Do those jive well? Do you really like her because of how she makes you feel over how compatible you are in regards to these core considerations? Are either of you actually taking concrete steps towards realizing said goals? Are both of you being "Confessing your sins to a Catholic Priest in the confessional as a devout and practicing Catholic" honest with each other? If no than either she, you, or ya both got more work to do.

Marriage/Family is serious business. Far FAR too many people (due to broken attachment) risk it all on a very poor bet that anyone with good attachment would have seen as bad a light year away.

If you're scared to tell her you want children, would prefer to live/raise your family in X faith (atheism counts as a faith BTW), etc. and that you've got convictions solid enough to tell her to get bent if she wants to directly contravene them and you fold like wet toilet paper when she does you're setting yourself up for a very painful and potentially suicide inducing divorce 5-7 years down the line if you're lucky.

Not type related: Never bang a girl who is crazier than you. Bad attachment and Crazy are directly correlated. Again, hope you've hit the jackpot but be smart about that. If ya win the Powerball take the upfront payout. That 20k A month for X-years sounds better unless and until you fully understand how inflation works.

Thanks for the advice!

As a Socionics fundamentalist, I believe we match in terms of values precisely because we are duals. Honesty is a big one for me, which includes expressing our feelings without judgement, Loyalty of course is important, and mutual support is also something I value. She seems to understand and value those things just as much as I do, which is pretty good.

As for the marriage and kids stuff, we talked about it and are definitely on the same page. Let's just say "go forth and multiply". lol

I think another big point to take into account in a partner is parental acceptance, probably more important for women than for men (as in, if her parents don't accept you then you're screwed). A few days ago she mentioned that her Dad said that it's okay to marry me. Life comes at you fast...

[idol]

I did match with a girl who types as ENTJ on some dating app. Thought this can be interesting, she is into typing and we may have sth in common. She then sends her fx trading photos when flirting. LOL never been disinterested so fast.

[Sol]

I did match with a girl who types as ENTJ on some dating app

In common, it's people who did tests. Some could read a popular book. Sometimes got official MBTI typing, what improves not much.
Such situations should be understood that a type may easily differ on a single dichotomy trait. For socionics users should also be added a mirror type.
ENTJ: ENTJ + ENTP + ENFJ + ESTJ + INTJ (+INTP)
5-6 types can be. Rather different IR.

> Thought this can be interesting

Mb there are typology using dating/meeting sites. Try ISFPs there. But the chance that the said type is correct starts since 30%, - accuracy of an average test and best mb ~50% for people who were typed by someone experienced. The especial fun is to get your conflictor/superego which are among close types.

P.S. On socionics accented sites the range of a type difference can be higher, as Socionics has the nonsense of "Reinin traits" and who knows what else is used (alike Gulenko does). The accuracy that the type is correct should be not worse, but when incorrect - then variants may differ stronger.

[idol]

In common, it's people who did tests. Some could read a popular book. Sometimes got official MBTI typing, what improves not much.
Such situations should be understood that a type may easily differ on a single dichotomy trait. For socionics users should also be added a mirror type.
ENTJ: ENTJ + ENTP + ENFJ + ESTJ + INTJ (+INTP)
5-6 types can be. Rather different IR.

> Thought this can be interesting

Mb there are typology using dating/meeting sites. Try ISFPs there. But the chance that the said type is correct starts since 30%, - accuracy of an average test and best mb ~50% for people who were typed by someone experienced. The especial fun is to get your conflictor/superego which are among close types.

P.S. On socionics accented sites the range of a type difference can be higher, as Socionics has the nonsense of "Reinin traits" and who knows what else is used (alike Gulenko does). The accuracy that the type is correct should be not worse, but when incorrect - then variants may differ stronger.

Good idea, I'll try this. I'll maybe compare between all 4 kinds of SFs.

But what really wil happen that I'll have a bad date with some degenerate beta NF who just want to be choked and do drugs .

Edit: tried Boo and uninstalled so fast. I didnt see one non-fat chick out of hundreds. Tinder is the way still.