talanov questionnaire

[Adam Strange]

Ughhhh

ok, I filled it out…but is anyone extremely overwhelmed by all the directions. It’s practically a page. I’m going to screw it up, I just know it. Someone should do it for meee lol

ugh I’ll figure it out. I guess.

i have to make a new Gmail with certain thing in them and as for the file…ugh what?? It has to be in a certain format? Splendid.

Damn it.

@reverie, you realize, of course, that if you do this test wrong, there's going to be a tear in the space-time continuum and your entire house and yard will tilt into it, only to emerge years later as a spray of green bubbles smelling of cinnamon?

[Aster]

@reverie, you realize, of course, that if you do this test wrong, there's going to be a tear in the space-time continuum and your entire house and yard will tilt into it, only to emerge years later as a spray of green bubbles smelling of cinnamon?

lol



im just a little neurotic, ok

[Aster]

I think I just need to go to bed and do it in the morning.

[Aster]

Well…I sent it

now to wait and see if I get a reply

[EUDAEMONIUM]

Ughhhh

ok, I filled it out…but is anyone extremely overwhelmed by all the directions. It’s practically a page. I’m going to screw it up, I just know it. Someone should do it for meee lol

ugh I’ll figure it out. I guess.

i have to make a new Gmail with certain thing in them and as for the file…ugh what?? It has to be in a certain format? Splendid.

Damn it.

I felt exactly like you did lmao. I was so scared of messing something up and getting it rejected.

[Baqer]

I felt exactly like you did lmao. I was so scared of messing something up and getting it rejected.

My favorite part of showing this test to people is seeing them struggle to figure out how to send it so I can feel that I'm better than them.

[Aster]

I got EII, but IEI was very close & LEFV which I have no clue what that means yet lol

My Talanov Results

[qaz00]

SLI-LII hybrid
https://imgur.com/a/ZA2PRm1

[MissDucki]

I finally did it dammit...lets see the results!

[Vex]

I hope they're still taking tests bc I'm just now getting on this

[Metaphor]

ONLY, you said.

[Aquamarine]

Can I still send this in? I just finished it but I don't even know how to send it
@MissDucki how did you send this thing?

[MissDucki]

Can I still send this in? I just finished it but I don't even know how to send it
@MissDucki how did you send this thing?

Make a Junk email with these instructions:

4) Typology based on the questionnaire is strictly anonymous. This not only protects your privacy, but is also a mandatory requirement for the processor of your profiles, established by the legislation on personal data. When communicating with the processor, you are obliged to observe the rule of your anonymity. To send responses for processing and to receive the result, you must, before sending the questionnaire, create yourself (at https://www.yandex.ru/ or on Google) a temporary and purely anonymous electronic mailbox of the form OPR2021xxxxxx@yandex.ru or OPR2021xxxxxx @ gmail. com (where 6 conventional crosses are an individual random set of six Latin letters - letters, not numbers!). In this case, your email address must necessarily begin with OPR2021 ... (this is a guarantee that it was specially created for anonymous correspondence with us). When creating an address, you must specify "Profile" instead of a name, "Socionic" instead of a surname. Your phone number should not be attached to the created address (unless required by the provider of the created address). For details on creating this address, be sure to look at the "information" sheet. Last year's addresses starting with OPR2019 or OPR2020 are also allowed.


Send it to: oprtal584.3@gmail.com

[Aquamarine]

Make a Junk email with these instructions:

4) Typology based on the questionnaire is strictly anonymous. This not only protects your privacy, but is also a mandatory requirement for the processor of your profiles, established by the legislation on personal data. When communicating with the processor, you are obliged to observe the rule of your anonymity. To send responses for processing and to receive the result, you must, before sending the questionnaire, create yourself (at https://www.yandex.ru/ or on Google) a temporary and purely anonymous electronic mailbox of the form OPR2021xxxxxx@yandex.ru or OPR2021xxxxxx @ gmail. com (where 6 conventional crosses are an individual random set of six Latin letters - letters, not numbers!). In this case, your email address must necessarily begin with OPR2021 ... (this is a guarantee that it was specially created for anonymous correspondence with us). When creating an address, you must specify "Profile" instead of a name, "Socionic" instead of a surname. Your phone number should not be attached to the created address (unless required by the provider of the created address). For details on creating this address, be sure to look at the "information" sheet. Last year's addresses starting with OPR2019 or OPR2020 are also allowed.


Send it to: oprtal584.3@gmail.com

I'm very confused by what this part is telling me to do. And I'm not really sure what word to put in place of the x

[MissDucki]

I'm very confused by what this part is telling me to do. And I'm not really sure what word to put in place of the x

When creating an email address, it asks for your first name and last name. FOr first name put Profile and for last name put Socionic

[Aquamarine]

When creating an email address, it asks for your first name and last name. FOr first name put Profile and for last name put Socionic

Ohhhh thank you so much

[Vex]

Sent it in

[Vex]

My questionnaire came back ILI





EDIT: My psychosofical type is VELF Akhmatova.

[Aquamarine]

I got IEI
My results





I am also not sure what the letters in the 2nd pic means...

[Baqer]

I got IEI
My results





I am also not sure what the letters in the 2nd pic means...

The order of the letters in the second pick is:
Ni, Ne, Si, Se, Ti, Te, Fi, Fe, Qi, Qe, Di, De

So, ummm you're an Si dom whose just really ​bad at Se

[aciaradh]

These are my results: (I got substantially higher Alpha quadra value and receptive-adaptive scores if that matters at all)

[myresearch]

This is my result:






If someone can translate the things written in the below pic in that order, it would be appreciated.

[myresearch]

If someone can translate the things written in the below pic in that order, it would be appreciated.

@Northstar and @Suspiria translated it, if anybody is curious it is as follows:

extroversion, irrationality, static, intuition, peripheral, tactical, carefree, logic, merry, constructivist, yielding, asking, democratic, positivist, process

[Baqer]

the list of character traits is really interesting but with the way that my dual is described i just can't imagine getting along. duality in general is something that seems strange to me though so theres that

Find characters which seem like your dual description, in media or real life, and get comfortable with them, at which point you should be able to decide whether or not duality exists for you or not.

[Vex]

Well I took the new Oct/Nov questionnaire and still got ILI. So that's solidified in terms of Talanov. The only difference was that I got LEVF (Pascal).

Attached are the new tests for Nov. Also note that there is a new email address. The new email is oprtal584.2@gmail.com .

If you have trouble translating your results, this is the site I use to do so! :)

[telarana]

Does anyone know when the January version is going to come out? I was going to take this test cause I was excited to finally find the full version but now it looks like I should wait until they put out the updated one lol

[SoSo]

@telarana i did ask them and they said in approximately 10 days.

[Malandro]

Just spent the time doing the old version - gonna send it off anyway

EDIT: Actually allow that lol @Baqer

[telarana]

So they just posted the updated links- and this is gonna be a dumb question- but if Im trans, which test do I take? They have a "male" and a "female" version which im assuming are corresponding to cis genders. Like are they looking for social gender, neurobiological gender, assigned gender, hormonal gender, gender identity? Like all these contribute in different ways to your overall phenotype.

[AWellArmedCat]

So they just posted the updated links- and this is gonna be a dumb question- but if Im trans, which test do I take? They have a "male" and a "female" version which im assuming are corresponding to cis genders. Like are they looking for social gender, neurobiological gender, assigned gender, hormonal gender, gender identity? Like all these contribute in different ways to your overall phenotype.

I feel like if they didn't specify, then it's you to decide. I can't imagine you choosing the "wrong" one is going to throw their results that badly

[Baqer]

So they just posted the updated links- and this is gonna be a dumb question- but if Im trans, which test do I take? They have a "male" and a "female" version which im assuming are corresponding to cis genders. Like are they looking for social gender, neurobiological gender, assigned gender, hormonal gender, gender identity? Like all these contribute in different ways to your overall phenotype.

They're literally the same thing you have to put your gender in the thing anyway just do whatever.

[telarana]

They're literally the same thing you have to put your gender in the thing anyway just do whatever.

Yeah I saw that when I opened up the file. So I just did it for whatever. It was an interesting questionnaire. Very long. Fun though. The yandex email didn't work for me and kept flagging as spam even when I tried to edit it according to the directions so I just submitted via a new gmail address. I'm curious to see how the Psyche Yoga results are going to turn out. I've only taken the quizzes on the APTI website so I wonder what methodologies this questionnaire is using for its typing.

[Toro]

I scored SEE on this and VFEL for my psychsophic type.

The 200 associated traits are more interesting. It essentially called me dumb, horny, and violent.

17. His speech (both oral and especially written) is not characterized by the use of long complex sentences.

18. Compared with the average population level, he has a stronger sex drive, a strong libido, and behavior is largely dominated by the influence of the
main instinct.

84. Ancient animal instincts influence his behavior no less, but often even
stronger than reason and reason.

85. Strong libido

87. Most likely, his erudition is lame (since he does not have the need to store knowledge in his head, which is unlikely to be directly useful in his practice)

People of this type rarely have a scientific mind, and very
rarely have a serious interest in science. He almost certainly does not have and never had a
tendency to mechanically obsessively suggestive counting of objects in his field of vision (for
example, buttons on a jacket, people in line, etc.) - for his psychotype, such a habit (psychologists call it
perseveration) is uncharacteristic.

This psychotype usually has stronger orgasms than the average for the entire human population.

Knows how to "sell" some stale goods, sometimes much more on "scam".

For the work of a programmer, people of his psychotype usually have neither desire nor abilities.
It is usually characterized by emotional elation (possible indication of the development of the left
PFC and high dopamine tone)

169 Probably increased intestinal motility

186 He is often characterized by impudence and shamelessness

[Manatroid92]

Has there been a new form released recently? I got back an email that said "form 097" is the only one currently in use, but I have no idea where I'm actually supposed to source these test in the first place.

[telarana]

Has there been a new form released recently? I got back an email that said "form 097" is the only one currently in use, but I have no idea where I'm actually supposed to source these test in the first place.

Their new forms are here - see the pinned post (you may have to have your translator on): Talanov's questionnaires - a personality type test | VK

---

I got LIE (I actually re-submitted the test a week later because the initial reliability scores were lower than I wanted). The second time I also scored LIE but the reliability and internal consistency scores were much higher and the 200 word section also fit a lot better (94% compared to 87%). The reason why I was probably getting typed weird is due to the fact that I seem to be a 1E in the APTI system. I think that's kind of a weird typing for an LIE but I reviewed the data between both questionnaires and it seems to be strongly suggesting that I'm an 1E. I thought I was a 3E this whole time actually. So I have to look into it further to see if it actually is correct.

[Manatroid92]

Their new forms are here - see the pinned post (you may have to have your translator on): Talanov's questionnaires - a personality type test | VK

---

I got LIE (I actually re-submitted the test a week later because the initial reliability scores were lower than I wanted). The second time I also scored LIE but the reliability and internal consistency scores were much higher and the 200 word section also fit a lot better (94% compared to 87%). The reason why I was probably getting typed weird is due to the fact that I seem to be a 1E in the APTI system. I think that's kind of a weird typing for an LIE but I reviewed the data between both questionnaires and it seems to be strongly suggesting that I'm an 1E. I thought I was a 3E this whole time actually. So I have to look into it further to see if it actually is correct.

Appreciated. Good to know that you got the result you think is accurate!

Unfortunately it seems like I can't connect to the page for some reason, don't know why. Is it only compatible with certain browsers, or is it a firewall/antivirus issue?

[telarana]

Appreciated. Good to know that you got the result you think is accurate!

Unfortunately it seems like I can't connect to the page for some reason, don't know why. Is it only compatible with certain browsers, or is it a firewall/antivirus issue?

That's weird. I know it wouldn't let me "sign up" to follow their page or whatever but I could see it on my browser just fine. I use Edge/Chrome.

[Manatroid92]

That's weird. I know it wouldn't let me "sign up" to follow their page or whatever but I could see it on my browser just fine. I use Edge/Chrome.

No worries.

I managed to work it out, my internet provider apparently has some issues with that website in particular, so I had to connect my computer to my phone's data, haha.
If I hear back from them after I send them the form I might post my results here.

[Manatroid92]

So the questionnaire came back with EII as leading type (same result as the first time I took the test), but curiously with IEI as second-highest.
If I were to guess, it might be because they are both Positivist, share similar function strength (albeit with swapped values), and are introverted (IEE was runner-up to IEI, so this might make some sense).

results1.PNG


I was taken aback at how accurate the 200 associated traits were, though some of the traits had repeated elements contained in them (not in identical fashion, but rather there was a combination of other repeated traits in one entry).
Putting aside whether or not the sociotype result is accurate, the 200 traits are definitely very interesting to look at, and given that they're unique to this kind of 'test' I think it's worth taking just to get your own results and see if they suit you.

[Kurt Gabin]

Talanov just published a fresh version of his questionnaire: http://otkroysebya.ru/en-anketa-584-098.xlsx

They will process responses until the 1st of May