So, what's your type and what type would you like to be and why?
This thread is for fun, no need for a 45 pages essai on the matter.
You can if you want to, of course, having some nerdy fun is the point.
Why would you want to be another type?
So, what's your type and what type would you like to be and why?
This thread is for fun, no need for a 45 pages essai on the matter.
You can if you want to, of course, having some nerdy fun is the point.
LIE- so I can be rich and make money
EIE-Cause that fuckin Fe is to die for, also I am curious for a victim erotic style as a feeler, it would be nice to get Se doms and creatives to help me lol
LII- Life would be easier with Ti/Ne I think as a women, plus I am curious for infantile style.
Maybe ILE-Ti.
So I can be every type and....
EII - Friend everyone on my street
ESE - Have a party with everyone I friended
ESI - apart from the a holes
IEE - Find out a bit about everyone
LSI - type everyone
ILI - plan out a robbery on street
SLE - do the robbery
LIE - head to the casino with the robbery money
SEE - network with my new rich friends
ILE - come up with idea for new space rocket for rich freinds
LII - Design rocket
SLI - build rocket
LSE - be the rocket micro manager for the mars trip
SEI - go get a massage, cause back ache from the mars trip
IEI - wake up cause it was a dream
EIE - write screenplay for dream
Se-ESI - I’d be me but more well rounded and assertive
Any Fi dom...so either EII or ESI. I guess it's the serious vibe that I like. Sometimes I feel as if I was more like that I'd be more respected as a person.
Chronic "grass is always greener" syndrome
Some EII don’t friend anyoneOriginally Posted by rtht
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
EII
I wouldn’t want to be another type. I’m comfortable with it
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh I'm sure, I just went for the fun option since that's what OP wanted.... I'm sure that most of those scenarios won't play out for most of those ppl IRL
ESE, when I used to be into an LII
LIE, because of their confidence
LSI, because she was the only person who mattered to my SEE ex
Oh, and ILI of course. Because who doesn’t want to be like their Benefactor?
I enjoy being EII, but not the excessive pessimism and lack of perseverance that comes with it.
Nah I like my type.
There are very few things that I would change about Myself, and I especially wouldn't change anything about My personality.
If You can super size Your ego to the gargantuan summit of courage and valor, then there's no devil's tripe-wire or doom desire that will ever overturn or outrun My rocket.*
TelvanniYoda GiordanoBruno BruceLee GeorgeLucas AnakinJirachi Regigigas DominatorLugiaWes TyphlosionMontalk
It's a miracle, but BunnyRaptor did actually beat Lebron James ~ it was Rainbows the Octopus as Lugia, Walking Wake the Suicune/Celebi and Pikachu, heavenly waves of blessed arcanum jolts shivering auroras of blooming expansion and redirecting wires of uplifting terror strikes and siege engines obliterating!!
Wesley Sneijder claimed UEFA 2010 was harder than FIFA. Mavs 2011 was harder than 2013.
A fair face may fade, but a beautiful soul lasts forever. Lucky Numbers - 53, 10, 29, 14, 1, 21.
1999-2000 = 2013+2016 | GosensZidane=2024 199
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...wind-2002-2003
I don't want to be another type, I think if you wish to be another type you should just work on improving yourself.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
I wouldn't mind being an EIE, the only thing is that my Ti HA screams at the thought.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
