hello
i stumbled across this site while looking at socionics info through Google.
anyways, i'm maple, an ISTJ LSE-3Si
wow
hello
i stumbled across this site while looking at socionics info through Google.
anyways, i'm maple, an ISTJ LSE-3Si
wow
ISTJ is LSI. to have 2 types is impossibly
there are no subtypes in Socionics. it's baseless hypothesis.
in Jung types can be different functional balance. but nothing to think this as stable, as having practical use or to say about existing of methods to identify this difference.
instead of "subtypes" you may say about other difference in people, besides their Jung types with "subtypes"
I recommend to make a video to check your Jung type
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Hi
How much do you plan?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Usually my planning is just for the next day. I do it the night before.
I feel sort of indifferent to Ni if I'm being honest. It's kind of just there for me, I don't really pay attention to it (if that makes sense).
I mean, I like to be on time.
I don't rush others. Usually, I myself take a lot of time to do things.