bigger aircraft carrier capability design components

[dangerbird89]

aircraft carriers with huge chains falling their hulls which propel them with metal fins that resemble gigantic chainsaws that have fins on them instead of blades can increase the size speed and acceleration of aircraft carriers so much so that they can hold a dozen times more jets onboard them along with more runways is now within the grasp of humans navies as a product of my inventive engineering breakthroughs i have made this week.the energy that powers such propulsion needs to be from gears off of giant engines crankshafts that spins very durable metal chains that are huge and full of huge gears that also spin with alot of torque so that the fins which propel the huge carriers are propelled extra hard and extra fast to achieve generating major thrust for such naval carrier ships.

[ouronis]

This reads like a spam ad for an aircraft carrier

[Adam Strange]

This reads like a spam ad for an aircraft carrier

I think he’s talking about paddle boats.

But I like the huge spinning gears and the fins propelling extra hard and generating huge major thrust. Very evocative.

[xerx]

Aircraft carriers face a major possible threat from hypersonic missiles. Russian and Chinese models can go up to mach 5 and can maneuver in flight. @dangerbird89, mainstays of military technology routinely go obsolete, making it a bad idea to put all your dollars in one basket. After all, when's the last time that you've heard of battleships (themselves made obsolete by aircraft carriers)?

[dangerbird89]

you have the potential to possibly defend your carriers from air assault strikes far larger than what a current carrier can launch during ww3 for example by having carriers be as big as possible.this technology makes this possible via 3 mathematical variables xyz.x = the gear specifically off the crankshaft not the camshaft which boost max torque more than in a cars engine where the camshaft turns carpenter belts to make those engine work. y = the gears on the chains which spin directly near the engine pistons that are there to maximize the mechanical power of the fin-blade-chains z = the fins which go along and down the hull in very long straight lines which can rip water backwards with thousands of times more torque than how chainsaws cut trees which thrusts the carrier forwards hundreds of times more powerfully than current propellers on current carriers can possibly achieve now.an aircraft carrier being as big as possible makes it so that it has more room for anti-air missile defenses and it means that they can have a bigger ammo-supply for these anti-air defenses.

[xerx]

by having carriers be as big as possible.

Bad idea!! That just makes them giant floating targets for missiles and aircraft. It's why battleships became obsolete.

[dangerbird89]

Bad idea!! That just makes them giant floating targets for missiles and aircraft. It's why battleships became obsolete.

what i have described is how to upgrade current carriers now so that they are new carriers which do alot more including being able to shoot down incoming missiles with -naval anti air systems.naval anti-air systems are real and current an area of scientific innovation.as anti naval ships weapons have increased the security level of naval vessels such as carriers has increased.here is how wipikpedia describes these anti air systems that exist in real reality which have made it so that the navy can strike so well which occurs instead https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-in_weapon_system it is better to educate yourself on reality to be able to compete even at all in a debate by the way.i noticed that you do not seem to be using your mind properly or something.

[xerx]

what i have described is how to upgrade current carriers now so that they are new carriers which do alot more including being able to shoot down incoming missiles with -naval anti air systems.naval anti-air systems are real and current an area of scientific innovation.as anti naval ships weapons have increased the security level of naval vessels such as carriers has increased.here is how wipikpedia describes these anti air systems that exist in real reality which have made it so that the navy can strike so well which occurs instead https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-in_weapon_system it is better to educate yourself on reality to be able to compete even at all in a debate by the way.i noticed that you do not seem to be using your mind properly or something.

OK, if you want to develop that idea and pitch it to the Pentagon, then I sincerely wish you good luck. But modern military designs (including naval vessels) have been transitioning more and more towards stealth, and that involves minimizing their surface area in order to reduce their radar profile. The new F-35 is specifically being pitched as a stealth fighter that can evade interception by Russian S-300, 400, and 500 SAM systems.

A gargantuan weapons platform with the ability to shoot down incoming rockets sounds nice. But shooting down fast-moving missiles with small radar cross-sections, that can arrive from multiple directions, and that may even travel with a complement of decoys, presents serious complications for the design of point defense systems. Garish mega weapons like these, that do nothing to minimize their likelihood of detection, don't personally strike me as the safest investment. It would be cool to have the contemporary equivalent of a Super Star Destroyer, I'll give you that much.

[Capitalist Pig]

https://youtu.be/LXc-wPFj8IE

[dangerbird89]

OK, if you want to develop that idea and pitch it to the Pentagon, then I sincerely wish you good luck. But modern military designs (including naval vessels) have been transitioning more and more towards stealth, and that involves minimizing their surface area in order to reduce their radar profile. The new F-35 is specifically being pitched as a stealth fighter that can evade interception by Russian S-300, 400, and 500 SAM systems.

A gargantuan weapons platform with the ability to shoot down incoming rockets sounds nice. But shooting down fast-moving missiles with small radar cross-sections, that can arrive from multiple directions, and that may even travel with a complement of decoys, presents serious complications for the design of point defense systems. Garish mega weapons like these, that do nothing to minimize their likelihood of detection, don't personally strike me as the safest investment. It would be cool to have the contemporary equivalent of a Super Star Destroyer, I'll give you that much.

if these carriers that my mindpower went into designing were equipped with the equivalent of 200-350 of these https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/S..._Weapon_System which could be achieved for winning world wars then mile-long navy ships would be secure from a thousand missiles heading at them.especially if the 200-350 anti-air laser systems were nuclear powered by the carriers nuclear reactor core on the carriers my mindpower is going in to designing now constantly as much as possible completely unstoppably.

[dangerbird89]

another strategic advantage of having 1-2 mile long aircraft carriers for world war 3 is in the case that enemies have secret upgraded missiles that penetrate further into targets they strike for use as a surprise attack because of how these 1-2 mile long nuclear reactor core powered carriers nuclear reactors won't be able to be hit and explode the entire naval fleet that they are nearby due to a nuclear blast from their nuclear reactors exploding due to explosive blasts from upgraded missiles surprise attacks.

[xerx]

if these carriers that my mindpower went into designing were equipped with the equivalent of 200-350 of these https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/S..._Weapon_System which could be achieved for winning world wars then mile-long navy ships would be secure from a thousand missiles heading at them.especially if the 200-350 anti-air laser systems were nuclear powered by the carriers nuclear reactor core on the carriers my mindpower is going in to designing now constantly as much as possible completely unstoppably.

I don't know whether or not that's the case and don't have the knowledge to make that determination. Presumably, some of that knowledge, or speculation thereon, exists in some out-of-the-way skunkworks that's affiliated with some military agency. It's also worth noting that detecting threats is just as important as shooting them down.

[dangerbird89]

I don't know whether or not that's the case and don't have the knowledge to make that determination. Presumably, some of that knowledge, or speculation thereon, exists in some out-of-the-way skunkworks that's affiliated with some military agency. It's also worth noting that detecting threats is just as important as shooting them down.

naval carrier radars that scan for sound waves via some quantum physics technology advancement by harnessing the ability observation has in quantum physics to -make atoms shake with such radar systems that can -detect shaking of atoms a hundred miles away in the form of stealth aircraft/fighters noise via similar physics that resembles what -makes atoms shake.it makes sense that if certain experiments technology can possibly generate something making atoms shake even at all due to observation then some kind of quantum physics science advancements can use similar physics wave functions that make this shaking possible to detect such shaking like a radar system would detect something with physics wave functions.it seems that with enough mindpower going into developing any technology for any ambitious purpose that it is possible to develope any kind of technology that can achieve anything.so then it makes sense that by funding this research on quantum radar systems enough that such technology can become fully operational military technology.

[dangerbird89]

1-2 mile long carriers with enough laser anti air defenses and long cannons is a better strategic choice for navies because of how such aircraft carriers won't need any kind of escort ships to transport them.use of such carriers consolidates resources of any navy that uses them.

[Adam Strange]

I don't know whether or not that's the case and don't have the knowledge to make that determination. Presumably, some of that knowledge, or speculation thereon, exists in some out-of-the-way skunkworks that's affiliated with some military agency. It's also worth noting that detecting threats is just as important as shooting them down.

Several companies are involved with making laser weapons to shoot down missiles. Lasers have the advantage of being very fast to the target (speed of light) and unlike metal-based defenses, the lasers don't run out of ammo (photons) as long as they are getting power from somewhere.

They have some real disadvantages, though. Laser beams are being projected through a turbulent atmosphere, which tends to defocus the beams. Additionally, rain and fog can scatter the laser light in all directions, which also subtracts from the amount of power reaching the target, and targets can be coated with reflecting materials which reflect the lasers away.

Having said that, lasers can offer some terrific advantages beyond what I already mentioned. The power densities are now high enough so the beams can cut through aluminum like a hot knife through butter (when they can get to the target). They can easily track missiles which are jinking from one side to the other, which is a defensive strategy which works against other missiles, but not target-locked laser beams. They are very lightweight. You could put a gun stock on a 50,000 watt laser projector and one man could field the laser and a second man could backpack the laser power source. Finally, they operate at wavelengths which can destroy missile infrared guidance systems.

[xerx]

Several companies are involved with making laser weapons to shoot down missiles. Lasers have the advantage of being very fast to the target (speed of light) and unlike metal-based defenses, the lasers don't run out of ammo (photons) as long as they are getting power from somewhere.

They have some real disadvantages, though. Laser beams are being projected through a turbulent atmosphere, which tends to defocus the beams. Additionally, rain and fog can scatter the laser light in all directions, which also subtracts from the amount of power reaching the target, and targets can be coated with reflecting materials which reflect the lasers away.

Having said that, lasers can offer some terrific advantages beyond what I already mentioned. The power densities are now high enough so the beams can cut through aluminum like a hot knife through butter (when they can get to the target). They can easily track missiles which are jinking from one side to the other, which is a defensive strategy which works against other missiles, but not target-locked laser beams. They are very lightweight. You could put a gun stock on a 50,000 watt laser projector and one man could field the laser and a second man could backpack the laser power source. Finally, they operate at wavelengths which can destroy missile infrared guidance systems.

Thanks Adam, I've never worked with laser systems (outside of school) but this is really interesting stuff. It's definitely piqued my curiosity.

But I'm going to wait before trusting systems like these to shoot down swarms of missiles traveling along quick and unpredictable trajectories. I say this because there's been a lot of undeserved hype about missile interception before. Israel's "Iron Dome" missile system, for example, which was deployed to shoot down Hamas' rockets, was a complete failure according to an MIT scientist. Lasers are obviously quicker and wieldier compared to physical ordnance; but, then again, so are hypersonic missiles compared to traditional projectiles.

[xerx]

naval carrier radars that scan for sound waves via some quantum physics technology advancement...

dangerbird89, there's no need to deploy quantum acoustic technology to detect incoming missiles. When an object (such as a hypersonic missile) travels faster than the speed of sound, it adds its momentum to its sound waves, which get pushed forward and travel at 3.14159 X the speed of light. And anything that travels faster than light creates a temporal causality paradox, which is easily detectable using Minkowski spacetime scanners.

[dangerbird89]

dangerbird89, there's no need to deploy quantum acoustic technology to detect incoming missiles. When an object (such as a hypersonic missile) travels faster than the speed of sound, it adds its momentum to its sound waves, which get pushed forward and travel at 3.14159 X the speed of light. And anything that travels faster than light creates a temporal causality paradox, which is easily detectable using Minkowski spacetime scanners.

in world war 3 it is anticipatible now that stealth painted missiles would be developed that do not go so fast as to make a temporal causality paradox so that they are stealth to radar and mirkowski spacestime scanners.so in this case that seems like what would occur during world war 3 the quantum physics radar i described would be capable of detecting stealth missiles traveling bellow whatever speed that is necessary to remain undetected by minkowski spacetime scanners.if such minkowski spacetime scanners were operational technology.there does not seem to be any evidence that minkowski spacetime scanners are operational technology.im interested in if if you have any how such systems function or how they could be developed in detail.

[dangerbird89]

it seems that i will be making alot of money off of the notebooks ideas that i found in a treasure box that was hurried in the sand on the gulf coast in ocean springs mississippi which is now the case due to how that i have officially patented 95% of the inventions written down in these notebooks.i will spend my time successful in mansions full of booze drugs prostitutes and in my street race cars racing.it will be so awesome ill smoke weed all day n all night on the ocean on my yacht then back to my mansion.ill have a private jet ill be able to travel anywhere aground the world with also.then ill bring huge amounts of money and 420 with me so i can visit strip clubs in every country of the world.this is what ill be getting used to in the future.