.
.
Last edited by necrosebud; 04-26-2023 at 04:25 PM.
DCNH is a filtering system, and as such, it can be used to look at people and sort them into categories. How accurate it is and how stable the types are is open to question.
But if you were asking which types theoretically are supposed to do well together, it's D with N, and C with H.
http://varlawend.blogspot.com/2020/0...types.html?m=1
far-distance subtype at the Social level and a close-distance subtype at the Psychological level.
someone was of the opinion that the most well developed person would have one dominant, two auxiliaries, and one "inferior". if someone has only one it makes them a pretty one sided person.
I like this addition to the theory because it explains why although I'm an H, there are many moments where I become very C-like, always happening at close-distance. So it further acknowledges that subtypes are a flexible, grey zone.
Otherwise, I don't find the theory very useful because it feels like we might soon drown in subtyping.
it's baseless hypothesis which is not Socionics
can be used to rationalize mistakes in types
more appropriate is to talk with its author - Gulenko. and his fans in viewpoints section