Quote Originally Posted by myresearch View Post
Ofcourse every person is going to be different regardless of their subtype, we all have individualistic features. However, typology based on finding similarities. DCHN isn't a seperate system, it is connected to socionics. According to socionics, position of IEs matter the most, cannot be disregarded.

I shared those videos to illustrate what I meant. DCHN contradicts with two subtype system. DCHN completely disregards the position of IEs, how can SLE-D(Te) could use that Te enhancement in a similar way with LSE-D(Te) or LSI-D(Te). Someone has enhanced demonstrative IE, other has enhanced base IE, other one has enhanced ignoring. The position determines how that IE is used. Again, how can someone is able to enhance their role and base IE at the most, role shadows the base, base shadows the role.

Behaviour is impacted by the governance of energy over time (essentially what Model G is describing). The idea that type is immediately apparent and not an underlying feature is what I take issue with, hence my comment on using 2 minutes of video. There are a lot of superfluous factors that impact behaviour, which is why I think it's a bit silly to zoom in on extraneous details that may be a feature of the underlying type, or just a blip on the radar.