Results 1 to 34 of 34

Thread: Celebrity DCNH Type Examples

  1. #1
    Aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI-N (Fe) 946 sp/so
    Posts
    4,341
    Mentioned
    609 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Celebrity DCNH Type Examples

    Post celebrity DCNH examples

    credit for this thread goes to @Alive (his idea )
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,759
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    it's baseless nonsense of Gulenko and is not Socionics

    for that section
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti.../82-Viewpoints

  3. #3
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,369
    Mentioned
    359 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    From Gulenko's site:
    Steve Wozniak Creative,


    dominant :
    Jeff Bezos, ILI
    Angela Merkel, LII
    Donald Trump, SEE
    Henry Ford, LSE
    Julia Timoshenko, EIE

    normalizing
    Genrich Altshuller, ILE

    harmonizing,
    Grigori Reinin, ILI
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  4. #4
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,310
    Mentioned
    285 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dominant subtypes:

    ILE: Bill Nye
    SEI: Joe Biden, Jim Henson
    ESE: (I only know german examples)
    LII: don't have an example yet

    EIE: Christiano Ronaldo, Neil deGrasse Tyson
    LSI: Elon Musk, Sean Connory, Ted Turner
    SLE: Recep Erdoğan, Tucker Carlsen, Tyson Fury, Mike O’Hearn
    IEI: Barack Obama, Nelson Mandela, Julian Assange, Marilyn Manson

    SEE: Donald Trump, Anthony Robbins, 50 Cent, Ronnie Coleman
    ILI: Bobby Fischer, Thomas Jefferson, Nikola Tesla
    LIE: Henry Ford, Arnold Schwarzenegger
    ESI: Clint Eastwood, Zinedine Zidane

    IEE: Stephen Colbert, Tom Brady, Jim Carrey
    SLI: William, Duke of Cambridge
    LSE: George H. W. Bush, Mitt Romney
    EII: Abraham Lincoln, James Blake
    Last edited by Still Alive; 05-02-2021 at 01:36 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  5. #5
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,310
    Mentioned
    285 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Creative subtypes:

    ILE: Andy Samberg, Leslie Nielsen, Weird Al Yankovic, Colin Furze
    SEI: Hila Klein
    ESE: Heidi Klum, Chackie Chan, Natalia Taylor, Jacksepticeye
    LII: Victor Gulenko

    EIE: Kanye West, Michelle Obama, Marlon Brando, Taylor Swift, pewdiepie, Brad Mondo
    LSI: Magnus Carlsen, Brad Pitt
    SLE: Daniel Craig, Miley Cirus, Kirsten Joy Weiss, Corey Wayne, Charlie Sheen, Dan Bilzerian
    IEI: Sufjan Stevens, Lou Reed, Dita von Teese, Keanu Reeves, Markiplier

    SEE: Leonardo DiCaprio, Jeffrey Star, Jake Paul
    ILI: Christopher Nolan
    LIE: Vsauce, MrBeast, Jordan Peterson, Bill Gates
    ESI: Melania Trump, Jimmy Kimmel

    IEE:Carola Rackete, Donald Glover, Bill Murray, Zach King
    SLI: Harrison Ford
    LSE: James Dyson, Marques Brownlee, Gordon Ramsay
    EII: Gwyneth Paltrow, Claudia Schiffer
    Last edited by Still Alive; 05-02-2021 at 12:04 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  6. #6
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,310
    Mentioned
    285 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Harmonizing Subtypes:

    EIE: Vincent Van Gogh
    IEI: George R. R. Martin

    SEE: Charles Bukowski
    ILI: Stephen Hawking

    might update more in the future but can't really guarantee it.
    Last edited by Still Alive; 05-02-2021 at 12:05 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  7. #7
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,369
    Mentioned
    359 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gulenko EII celebs
    Abraham Maslow, C
    Cinderella (fictional), N
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  8. #8
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    Dominant subtypes:
    SLE: Tucker Carlsen
    Somehow I don't think so . . .


  9. #9
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    17,113
    Mentioned
    1622 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Tucker Carlsen is a pussy. Not SLE.

  10. #10
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,310
    Mentioned
    285 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I personally hope that the thread won't end up in a debate about every subtype typing I've made tbh
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  11. #11
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I personally hope that the thread won't end up in a debate about every subtype typing I've made tbh
    I disagree with most of them, but will only mention the one I did. If you still think he's D-SLE I have no intention of debating, so no worries there. The candid video I think gives a lot of information into his personality.

  12. #12
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    17,113
    Mentioned
    1622 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    I disagree with most of them, but will only mention the one I did. If you still think he's D-SLE I have no intention of debating, so no worries there. The candid video I think gives a lot of information into his personality.
    Tucker is a little kid. An Infantile. His flies are Si. He wants to appear to be an old man. (He used to wear bow ties when he was in his twenties - Lol.) That points to Delta NF, and since he appears to be more extroverted than introverted, I'd say IEE.

    It's wise to recall that I'm wrong about 60% of the time, though.

    *If you want reasons for my typing him as being not SLE.*

    @Alive, I do agree with many of your assigned types, but debating the ones I disagree with would be a long process and probably would lead nowhere and everyone has things they have to do in the real world. This is just entertainment.

    This is not the first time I've wished for absolute standards of sociotype, but I wish for a lot of things I'm not going to get.
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 05-02-2021 at 06:04 PM.

  13. #13
    Poptart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    2,867
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Pretty sure Tucker is LIE

    Edit - IEE would probably be my second guess tho.
    Last edited by Poptart; 05-02-2021 at 06:16 PM.

  14. #14
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,310
    Mentioned
    285 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    @Alive, I do agree with many of your assigned types, but debating the ones I disagree with would be a long process and probably would lead nowhere and everyone has things they have to do in the real world. This is just entertainment.
    the main problem really is that I simply don't have the time to defend my typings or even discuss them. I can really only dedicate so much time to it all and while I'm open about general types it will be a very tedious process to debate subtypes overall. some people seemed to have an interest in this thread so I posted my lists which also took a while to do. I might add some more examples or remove some depending how I feel but I would prefer if people just silently disagreed or others post their own list.

    regarding tucker carlsen: I've typed him maybe a year or so ago and obviously don't remember him all that well anymore but in my notes he was catalogued as initiating subtype. if I think back of him now I would say I remember him as a rather grounded person with strong convictions. I also think he shares some physical similarities with logan paul, who I would consider as an SLE-D, too. my list here is really just there to give a general idea about DCNH and maybe give some people a perspective on how I see types.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    TIM
    IEI-Ni H946
    Posts
    2,170
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    David Lynch IEI-H
    Edvard Munch EIE-C
    Van Gogh EIE-H
    D.H Lawrence, possibly EII-C but it's a bit of a guess.









  16. #16
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Most of your typing results are NOT accurate. More than 90% of them are completely false.

    As you do not know anything about socionics, abnormal psychology and criminal psychology you are not competent to find out the personality type of anyone.

    The best would be to remove all of your results from the internet.

    Perhaps you are more interested to spread false information about Jungian psychology.


    You are not the only one who who published false typing results. Most MBTI and Socionics websites do that, including socionics.com and idrlabs.com

    (idrlabs.com examples are scam)



    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    the main problem really is that I simply don't have the time to defend my typings or even discuss them. I can really only dedicate so much time to it all and while I'm open about general types it will be a very tedious process to debate subtypes overall. some people seemed to have an interest in this thread so I posted my lists which also took a while to do. I might add some more examples or remove some depending how I feel but I would prefer if people just silently disagreed or others post their own list.
    This is the comment you are looking for



  17. #17
    FreelancePoliceman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    6,019
    Mentioned
    569 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by khcs View Post
    Most of your typing results are NOT accurate. More than 90% of them are completely false.

    As you do not know anything about socionics, abnormal psychology and criminal psychology you are not competent to find out the personality type of anyone.

    The best would be to remove all of your results from the internet.

    Perhaps you are more interested to spread false information about Jungian psychology.


    You are not the only one who who published false typing results. Most MBTI and Socionics websites do that, including socionics.com and idrlabs.com

    (idrlabs.com examples are scam)
    You are a very interesting person and I am very curious what you’re like IRL.

  18. #18
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FreelancePoliceman View Post
    You are a very interesting person and I am very curious what you’re like IRL.
    The most interesting Socionist in the world.

    This is the comment you are looking for



  19. #19
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,310
    Mentioned
    285 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    kinda reminds me of this

    https://youtu.be/RpkQEq75y18
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  20. #20
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE-C (ISTP)
    Posts
    2,368
    Mentioned
    250 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    Tucker is a little kid. An Infantile. His flies are Si. He wants to appear to be an old man. (He used to wear bow ties when he was in his twenties - Lol.) That points to Delta NF, and since he appears to be more extroverted than introverted, I'd say IEE.

    It's wise to recall that I'm wrong about 60% of the time, though.

    *If you want reasons for my typing him as being not SLE.*

    @Alive, I do agree with many of your assigned types, but debating the ones I disagree with would be a long process and probably would lead nowhere and everyone has things they have to do in the real world. This is just entertainment.

    This is not the first time I've wished for absolute standards of sociotype, but I wish for a lot of things I'm not going to get.
    Yeah, Tucker Carlson is not SLE. He's a delta extrovert.

  21. #21
    Poptart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    2,867
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by khcs View Post
    You are not the only one who who published false typing results. Most MBTI and Socionics websites do that, including socionics.com and idrlabs.com

    (idrlabs.com examples are scam)

    No. Kanye West is an ISFJ/SEI, and I will NOT let you take that away from me!

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.idr...t-is-isfj/amp/

  22. #22
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poptart View Post
    No. Kanye West is an ISFJ/SEI, and I will NOT let you take that away from me!

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.idr...t-is-isfj/amp/

    This is the comment you are looking for



  23. #23
    Aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI-N (Fe) 946 sp/so
    Posts
    4,341
    Mentioned
    609 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    Somehow I don't think so . . .

    lol to me he seems absolutely pissed and wants to be civil and play nice guy because he knows it’s going to end up on the web-for his public image, and I guess he probably also believes the guy has the right to be doing what he’s doing (but i still think he looks not very happy, but he starts loosening up at the end a bit.

    pretty funny he said he could fish there or anywhere honestly just looked like he started learning to fly fish because I can fly fish better than that think he might have been lying to that guy and pulling his leg a lot lol, so I don’t know if I believe all he said about his fly fishing...

    to me he seemed like he was being fake and kind of sarcastic, not that I really blame him lol, that’d be pretty annoying imo
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  24. #24
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    lol to me he seems absolutely pissed and wants to be civil and play nice guy because he knows it’s going to end up on the web-for his public image, and I guess he probably also believes the guy has the right to be doing what he’s doing (but i still think he looks not very happy, but he starts loosening up at the end a bit.

    pretty funny he said he could fish there or anywhere honestly just looked like he started learning to fly fish because I can fly fish better than that think he might have been lying to that guy and pulling his leg a lot lol, so I don’t know if I believe all he said about his fly fishing...

    to me he seemed like he was being fake and kind of sarcastic, not that I really blame him lol, that’d be pretty annoying imo
    Yeah, agree. I thought the skill with which he redirected the conversation even when pissed off says ethical type to me. He ends up getting the other guy to answer his questions and reverses the situation on him. He manages to sound interested and even warm as it turns more conversational instead of confrontational. Especially since Joey Boots apparently had a reputation for getting people so upset they'd physically assault him, so the disarming of him that way seems a not so common skill. And I think Tucker was aware from the beginning that anything he did could be used against him in the public eye. Other public figures aren't able to keep their cool and think of the consequences in that way, or don't care what the consequences are -- so I'm thinking NF maybe.

  25. #25
    Aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI-N (Fe) 946 sp/so
    Posts
    4,341
    Mentioned
    609 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    Yeah, agree. I thought the skill with which he redirected the conversation even when pissed off says ethical type to me. He ends up getting the other guy to answer his questions and reverses the situation on him. He manages to sound interested and even warm as it turns more conversational instead of confrontational. Especially since Joey Boots apparently had a reputation for getting people so upset they'd physically assault him, so the disarming of him that way seems a not so common skill. And I think Tucker was aware from the beginning that anything he did could be used against him in the public eye. Other public figures aren't able to keep their cool and think of the consequences in that way, or don't care what the consequences are -- so I'm thinking NF maybe.
    Yes, exactly. It was pretty far sighted and manipulative ...clever-ish lol I’m thinking he could be EIE myself.
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  26. #26
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,369
    Mentioned
    359 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Jung (LII) accroding to Gulenko: HN hybrid went from NH to HN.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  27. #27
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrightDemonSheep96 View Post
    Jung (LII) accroding to Gulenko: HN hybrid went from NH to HN.
    ?who is? you? or someone in thread?

  28. #28
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,369
    Mentioned
    359 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    ?who is? you? or someone in thread?
    Gulenko wrote in his consultation that: Jung's reflection on archetypal images [this, if I understand correctly, includes Fi evaluations] points towards HN complex subtype . He started as NH and ended up HN. Well, Jung was this overly polite figure first and then state to drift towards submersion of his thoughts.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  29. #29
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrightDemonSheep96 View Post
    Gulenko wrote in his consultation that: Jung's reflection on archetypal images [this, if I understand correctly, includes Fi evaluations] points towards HN complex subtype . He started as NH and ended up HN. Well, Jung was this overly polite figure first and then state to drift towards submersion of his thoughts.
    Ahhh, Jung's type. I was being slow. Interesting, as I would have thought the archetypal images was a reflection of Ni as core type. I think I see where he's coming from there though.

  30. #30
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,309
    Mentioned
    320 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    Ahhh, Jung's type. I was being slow. Interesting, as I would have thought the archetypal images was a reflection of Ni as core type. I think I see where he's coming from there though.

    Absolutely no Ni in his writings. Full of Ti meta-analysis. I would say that Ni types are immersed in archetypes and therefore don't see them, whereas Jung is this calm observer who creates models to explain the workings of the psyche as an object of study.

    Then it's another story that Jung as living a very full life went through a transformation and integration of the unconscious. But that is non-type related.
    The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.

    (Jung on Si)

  31. #31
    if it isn't Mr. Nice Guy Ave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    6,172
    Mentioned
    247 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallmo View Post
    Absolutely no Ni in his writings. Full of Ti meta-analysis. I would say that Ni types are immersed in archetypes and therefore don't see them, whereas Jung is this calm observer who creates models to explain the workings of the psyche as an object of study.
    If you mean Ni leads, then I would agree. It's supposed to be different for rationals, though.

    What type do you think Jung was?

  32. #32
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,369
    Mentioned
    359 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'd say Ni Creative generates optimal images for the purpose. Übermensch, Microsoft, Nazi Germany and such.
    Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 05-09-2021 at 09:34 AM.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  33. #33
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,309
    Mentioned
    320 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Ave View Post

    What type do you think Jung was?
    LII
    The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.

    (Jung on Si)

  34. #34

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    TIM
    IEI-Fe-DCh so/sx
    Posts
    1,295
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There's this lady on youtube who does energy profiling for fashion purposes, and the types she identifies as part of her system are extremely similar to DCNH. She put together these lists on her website, which are actually quite useful, in addition to the youtube videos where she explains her method in more detail or the different energy types and how the operate.. The clothes seem a bit tacky, since it's a fashion community, but she really goes in-depth into the types and their traits.

    Type 1 = C-sub, T2= H-sub, T3= D-sub.

    https://my.liveyourtruth.com/dyt/typ...brity-gallery/
    https://my.liveyourtruth.com/dyt/typ...brity-gallery/
    https://my.liveyourtruth.com/dyt/typ...brity-gallery/
    https://my.liveyourtruth.com/dyt/typ...brity-gallery/

    She has Melania Trump and Donald Trump as dominant types, Barron Trump harmonizing and Ivanka Trump as normalizing, which seems accurate enough, lol.

    Last edited by lynn; 02-26-2022 at 07:30 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •