DUMB and DUMBER - OCASIO CORTEZ AND MEGHAN MCCAIN
DUMBASS NUMBER ONE - MEGHAN MCCAIN
MEGHAN DOESN'T GET IT.
USA IS FCKIN' SOCIALIST. LOOK AT THE FCKIN' INCOME TAX RATE. I GOT FCKIN' TAXED 49 PERCENT ON A CHECK FOR 30 K. OVER 10K OF THOSE TAXES WERE BY THE FEDERAL.
THAT'S FCKIN SOCIALISM. INCOME TAX PERIOD IS FCKIN SOCIALISM. ANY TAX RATE OVER FIVE PERCENT IS SOCIALIST AS FUCK.
WELFARE STATE. PROGRAMS UP THE ASS. USA IS SOCIALIST ALREADY MEGHAN.
DUMBASS NUMBER TWO - CORTEZ
CORTEZ DOESN'T FCKIN GET IT EITHER.
YEAH, 60 PERCENT MAKE BELOW 40 K WHATEVER. THE SOLUTION IS NOT MORE SOCIALISM. THE SOLUTION IS TO THROW GLOBALISM OUT THE FCKIN WINDOW
BEFORE GLOBALISM BACK IN THE 50S=70S 40 K WAS ENOUGH TO BUY A HOUSE, CAR, PURCHASE PRACTICALLY, AND DO ALL MIDDLE CLASS SHIT.
NOW 120 K A YEAR IS SHIT. GLOBALISM DESTROYED THE MIDDLE CLASS.
GAS PRICES ARE OVER 40 SOMTHING TO FILL A TANK BEFORE GLOBALISM THEY WERE WHAT 15 BUCKS TO FILL A TANK...EVERYTHING HAS GONE UP BECAUSE THE USA SHIFTED FROM A COMPETITIVE TAKE NO PRISONERS ECONOMIC FOREIGN POLICY TO A COOPERATIVE ALTRUISTIC BEND-OVER-BACKWARDS FOR CHINA ECONOMIC FOREIGN POLICY
GAS PRICES ARE WAY UP BECAUSE OF GLOBALISM. COST OF LIVING IS WAY UP BECAUSE OF GLOBALISM. BUYIN' HOUSES IS WAY UP BECAUSE OF GLOBALISM. UNEMPLOYMENT IS WAY UP BEACUSE OF GLOBALISM.
GLOBALISM IS CLINTON'S NAFTA LIBERAL ASS-KISSING OF OTHER OCUNTRYS TO PUT MORE MONEY IN THE POCKETS OF OTHER COUNTRIES AND MAKE PRICES HERE HARDER ON THE US.
ITS COOPERATIVE BULLSHIT. THE ONLY WAY TO DOES ECONOMIC FOREIGN POLICY IS COMPETITIVELY - PROTECTIONISM, BULLYING TARRIFS, TAKING MONEY AND CHARGING FOR PROTECTION.
omg fix the healthcare system so it's not so capitalist and then i might be willing to consider the position the US is socialist. the US is way less "socialist" than most of europe for instance. I really don't know why your taxes are so high... is it the mafia tax?
“Socialism is when you have high taxes and welfare programs” — the way political terms are used in the States like “liberal,” “fascist,” “capitalist,” seems more of an indicator of how the speaker feels about whatever he’s describing than a meaningful description of something. “Socialism” is whatever conservatives hate, and self-described “socialists,” synonymous with “liberals,” are people who describe themselves as opposing the conservative culture war and/or don’t want the poor to die.
I don't understand how the most capitalist nation on earth is actually socialist, so explain that one, wizard
Whining about taxes is not an explanation btw
slaves should not understand what happens in politics, as in other case they would not obey to serve interests of a minority
so what medias and education says to masses is primitive propaganda
and to believe in it to spread and foolow better are good not smartest ones
had recent presidents of USA something outstanding in intelligence?
George Bush-jr had below average IQ, Obama looked as a hippy and was able to do nothing what promised, Trump was not smartest clown. then was "elected" the similar to them
since 1960s open politics of West is represented by clowns. owners of big money control nations. that's why education degrades and material inequality arises. while medias say more and more idiotic lie
Big Brother was not about USSR. it was about inequality where a minority controls and uses the majority for own interests. it's about capitalism in not lesser, but in higher degree
look what they do with covid hysteria. there is no scientic and hence laws also basis for the evident harm and restrictions governments do to people. but people obey, as they reject to control own lifes. Orwell and Huxley described alike that. there is said formal "democracy" but there is no power at majorities, which are used as mindless sheeps
these sheeps are formally controlled by clowns which formally represent interests of those sheeps. while medias talk about this circus
Neo-classical economics works best without barriers to free trade, so proponents of that (which range basically the entire in-power political spectrum, from center left to far right) will naturally favor policies that implement globalist ideas (while taxing the hell out of you because we have a bunch of SEE politicians who don't know how to manage money and are always fighting to get policies favorable to their donors at any cost)
First of all, stop writing using ALLCAPS.
Originally Posted by Kill4Me
Second of all, you're literally a libertarian. Under that philosophy, untrammeled free-trade and globalism ought to decrease the overall cost of living. If anything, the left, which includes so-called "socialists", has been the one force consistently fighting globalism, a term that was appropriated and renamed by folks like Steve Bannon (it used to be called 'globalization').
Last edited by xerx; 04-25-2021 at 06:13 AM.
This entire post is just you screaming right wing talking points into the void because you think that by putting your incoherent mess of an argument in all caps it'll convince people. I don't even know if it's right to call this a proper argument, it's just you acting like a child who thinks that using caps lock and bold text makes your point better.
Originally Posted by Kill4Me
EDIT: I'll give you an actual argument though, and that is that the reason that everything nowadays is shit is not because of globalization, and actually because of simple population growth. Usually, no matter what economic system, the more people there are the shittier people's living conditions get, since they're objectively worth less. The reason stuff has gotten shitty since the 50's, staring from the 70's, is that more laissez faire policies where implemented, allowing for businesses, especially the larger ones which are more predominant today, to give less of a shit about their workers and more of a shit about their profit. So they fire people, or give them lower paying jobs, justifying bad wages by having healthcare be ludicrously expensive so that people need a job to get it, and suddenly you have modern America. Population growth being shitty for lowers classes is also historically consistent, after all the black death was great for all the peasants in Europe who lived afterwards. And other mass death events happened at peak populations, so our future is scary to say the least.
Last edited by Baqer; 04-26-2021 at 05:19 AM.
With Cortez in politics and Bernie Sanders (previously) running for president, we are in the age of the "Marilyn Monroe," "Ditzy Blonde" political candidate who can look and speak in a way that is presentable, but whose ideas would sink the country. The other side of the coin is Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. If I was in the states, I wouldn't know who to vote for: there are the flakey candidates like Cortez, and then there is the sadist side of the spectrum with Trump and Clinton. It baffles me who runs and gets elected.
EDIT: I should also add that the reason I feel that way about Clinton and Trump is not simply because they are Se. I consider Arnold Schwarzenegger to be an Se ego, and I think he would make a fabulous president. He is someone Se that I actually like - although he would not qualify because of his citizenship.
Last edited by jason_m; 04-26-2021 at 01:02 PM.