I just teleported here - I'm new!!

[14Raptor19]

Hi, My name is RaptorWizard. I Love dreaming, wishing, writing, speaking, thinking, ruminating, reflecting, enjoying solitude, and I can't wait to experience these boards with exotic comments and interesting insights I can make along the way! I hope all goes well.

My type = INTP 5w6 so/sx

[Sol]

So many words about your personal traits and INTP match not good.
You may get opinions about your type in appropriate section. A video is important for such typing.

[14Raptor19]

So many words about your personal traits and INTP match not good.
You may get opinions about your type in appropriate section. A video is important for such typing.

Here is a video of Me!

[Adam Strange]

Here is a video of Me!

LSI

Definitely, though, ask Gulenko.


HOWEVER, as anyone here can tell you, I'm usually wrong in my typing.

Anyway, welcome to the forum.

[Nobody]

LSI-C (Ne subtype)

Welcome to the LSI Army!

[SGF]

#showtooltip banish
/cast [mod:shift][@mouseover,exist,harm,nodead][] Banish (rank 1)
/cast [nomod][@mouseover,exist,harm,nodead][] Banish (rank 2)

>spams banish in op's direction

LSI

Definitely, though, ask Gulenko.


HOWEVER, as anyone here can tell you, I'm usually wrong in my typing.

Anyway, welcome to the forum.

he won't make it through, G will label him gamma ILI due to his unkept outer appearance.

[14Raptor19]

The Exploration of Truth and Knowledge



Designing a Higher Society



Know the Mind of God



Multidimensional Reality of the Game

[14Raptor19]

Untangling the Clarity Present Arcanum



RaptorWizard on Imagination and Willpower (copying from Tom Montalk's videos by sharing My own System



RaptorWizard's Video Game Achievements

[qaz00]

ILE>IEI

[14Raptor19]

RaptorWizard as a Kidd The true Dark Magician and Lugia!

[14Raptor19]

The Meaning of Life is achieving infinite mastery of creation, becoming Bunny, diving down the clarity present arcanum and the polarized ebony whirlpool, mastering the Dragon Mind of Zen, sparkling in the superholographic glitter of the power of forever, omnipotence, indomitable willpower, evolving on the storybook journey of becoming the top kardashev civilization at every level, masquerading with the Tao's Final Annihilator Polarities, cosmic consciousness, Kobe Bryant/Marius Florin impossible cosmology, collecting Ultrarevolutionary Omniversalism, harmonizing Zang's System, categorizing SolitaryWalker's System, building Shingo's BladeRunner2049 System about Bunny, defeating MathewStarWars/TheMartialArtsJedi in the Orre Colosseum Finals hosted by Bunny's Kardashev Civilization, make fantasy greater than truth, moving mountains, inexorable extrication, surging self electrocution, become experientially over struck, write the most enchanting story, discover the most magical meaning of Love, become more creative than George Lucas, become smarter than Stephen Hawking, solve Jolee Bindo's Snake Story, enjoy Bunny's fantasy writing, become the Chosen 1 in Star Wars and Pokemon the Movie 2000 The Power of One, embark along the Johto Journeys Staircase, complete the Pokedex, find Dragonite at Bill's lighthouse, learn every power in the Force, go from Z to shining Z, go from Neo Genesis to Neo Destiny Pokemon Cards, work for the Gray Fox in Oblivion, go from Pokemon Gale of Darkness to Pokemon XG Next Generation, orchestrate the big crunch and big chill, break the laws of existence, focus the flow of creation, become God in Giordano Bruno's quote, organize Albert Einstein's library quote, create the Storybook worldbuilding quote, make the value of mastering hyperspace like a novel's journey rather than the destination, take risks for huge rewards since failure in a future timeframe is inevitable without trying, go to tesla's remember place with Jirachi, travel to Wayne Herschel's source in Oneism, bubble hearts, free will, questions, all spectra everywhere, penetrate across all lanes of infinities-ultimate, birth all worlds of light, connect the super-nexus, follow Oneism star maps to uncover the star forge in Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic, become Gandalf the White, celebrate victory forever, achieve perfect victory by bonding with Bunny at the Scholar's Garden in Jade Empire, become an RPG video game hero, stage an upset as Lawrence in Pokemon the Movie 2000 The Power of One, build the bridge to the invisible, become the Ubermensch in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, become Revan in Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic, become a Pokemon Wizard, become Michael in Pokemon Gale of Darkness, open the door to Your Heart as shadow Lugia, psycho boost Eldes to exponentially overturn the Kardashev scale, adventurous curiosity, jump from Zidane's Euro 2000 to predict the perfect future, free Yourself from all restrictions, transform into the Force, become the ultimate darkness and the ultimate light, shine your lightsaber crystal of true nature, overcome the tempest wind of the devil, craft the highest philosophy, voyage into the eldest civilization, stargaze across all vantage points, teleport atop Zarathustra's Wizard's Tower, transcend Zarathustra's Azure Bell and eternal security, be ready and ripe in the great noon in Zarathustra's quote, ride the torrent to the perfect future, harness the will of the Force, envision the Life in the Future 6000 and Beyond video, enchant the To Know the Unknown Mysteries of the Universe Secrets of the Cosmos video pictures, dazzle the default SabrinaCasey website pictures, unlock the ultimate legacy of RaptorWizard's Secret Garden of Rare Quotes, capture Slowking's System, jump into the philosophical white hole in time, activate the clockwork of the Cosmic Force Aegis, run the trance in another world hexagram, create and destroy infinite macroverses, aim high as in great attempts it is glorious even to fail, learn the lesson of perception to always focus and learn from your environment constantly as the greatest goal, conquer Anil Mitra's Journey in Being New World, consider all perspectives of da Vinci's Last Supper, receive Bunny as Sabrina, put Your Heart and Soul into constructing Your Yugioh deck, blossom into the highest nobilities, experience all of Pikachu's expressions in Pokemon Yellow, emerge atop RaptorWizard's Multidimensional Reality of the Game, transcend tom montalk's matrix control system, become the greatest being in the game, design the TH126 Let's Play community, develop prototypes for LucasArts, make the knowledge of all things possible by tapping into God's mind as pieces of our own minds, program the James Harden Net, go from Bunny 7-1 Lugia to Kobe 8-2 Tyranitar, destroy the spirit of gravity, speak in colorful ways, fissure the white space shatterpoint, get rid of all evil and visit lower levels to appreciate the higher, feel true mania over victory for the horn, tap the thunderbolt singularity, frenzy plant fork the future, descend from the mountaintop to offer universal enlightenment, pursue logic to the most farfetched goals, when the moment of truth comes accept your destiny and when it's your chance to be a hero rise to the challenge, live out happy stories, enter into Bunny's Imagination, resonate with the right intensity/mentality for the Pokemon Macroversal Tournament, paint Meganium's face with the Flower of eternity, initiate God's Millennium of peace, Kid's WB Yourself, higher mysteries, spellbinding secrets, go on the ultimate adventure, seize the ultimate prize, inherit the Legendary Pokemon Cards, go down the Rabbit hole, Will moving forever, brane walking Meganium, kill evil, fire the Rainbow bridge to infinity, launch an amazing arcade of video games, understand the ultimate meaning of Pokemon, let it all hang out at the ultimate level as a sheer cold schizoid Lugia, the Rainbow bridge continues as the story goes on forever, seek wisdom and mastery in solitude as a wizard lord, look into Yoda's abyss, join into Eagun's Pikachu Family, earn the Pokemon Stadium 2 R3 poster of Lugia and Ho-Oh curbing the crimson tide, hone the way of the closed fist, blast the big omniversal wizard’s of the coast blizzard, recollect on AHiddenWorld’s video, overcome the unknown regions, love of learning, use Yoda’s infinite time to solve the infinite mystery, surf the cosmic ocean, expand schematics beyond the furthest fringes of mind, feelings for futures reverse to foresee failure won if, unleash Suicune, Wish for joy that we each sea to shine sparkles of random rainbows for If to Will, think about Bunny everyday to always be Happy, prevent time travel to protect our sacred future, snag and purify all of the shadow Pokemon, achieve enough wisdom through age to become a demiurge in Tom Montalk’s System, pursue all limitless horizons of unfolding possibilities, secure Eldes’s Battle Studies in Jovi’s Purification Chamber of hyper advanced esoteric technologies with drama in simulated ShingoVerse music, and achieve Perfect Electrocution within Shadow Lugia’s purification chamber of systemic labyrinths and Jovi’s Bliss as a Shiny Silver (I already found a shiny Misdreavus in the summer of 2010 when I was 16 going into 11th grade [My Birthday is October 31st, 1993, and I’m a Raichu] {Riley Hicks})!!*

[The Reality Denialist]

RaptorWizard as a Kidd The true Dark Magician and Lugia!

Dude, I have seen these sorts of pics before https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism

Not that I judge you. Interesting.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

you seems ethical and Ni valuing, possibly IEI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVtLupvXQhA

[14Raptor19]

Pokemon is somewhere fun over the Rainbow emblazoned by the Power of Forever. The clouds soar and the island escalates a Meganium petal dance tempest blizzarding ashes and sunshine. Evanescence sparkles glistening auroras of mirth and high frequency channels embarking with the winds of new beginnings. This magical adventure turns on at the dawn of time in 2000. Ceremony and enchantment dazzle the world with colors galore. Mania and extravagance shape shift and transform into the greatest show on earth, the evolution of Pokemon!!*

[The Reality Denialist]

I think IEI could make sense. You seem to imbalanced in someway it is like ignoring Ne in vacuum. Practice some role function to get clear your mind.

[14Raptor19]

Slowpoke Destructoid






Dairy Queen Blizzards






On Valentines Day at Target, I did a bunch of pushups in front of Love signs to show Bunny My Love for Her.






Lando Calirisean was talking to Porygon when the Death Star exploded with George Lucas as Psyduck in a galaxy far far away.






The Star Forge runs atop the surface of a black ocean of branes underneath a green sky in Hyperspace.






Why was Bunny My Mom in a failed Omniverse?






My dog got served breakfast every day from Minnie Mouse in My Disney Kitchen.






Politoad jumped to the top of Niagara Falls. Buddha spiraled and whirled over the universe. Bunny came flying in a hot dog swiss cheese skirt and a tie die shirt snaking toucan colored apple cider.






Slowbro engaged the enemy at point blank range in His starship.






Michio Kaku on vacation was at the arcade of daredevil techniques ice skating through a lightsaber crystal cave. My grandma came carrying a pizza.

[14Raptor19]

RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's What is Philosophy? thread:
A question of great importance would be to clarify and define a universal definition for philosophy. I believe philosophy at its heart to be a quest for wisdom, though what one man sees as wise may be deemed foolish by another man. Though I do agree with SolitaryWalker that we must be careful about our perception of wisdom, and that in this quest we seek to advance our understanding, he holds understanding is the sole purpose, and that using philosophy to some other end is incorrect. Philosophy should also be a means of achievement, that is, it should make us grow in greatness. He is right however when he further asserts how philosophy transcends the empirical nature of science, and that a metaphysical assumption must first be made before it can be empirically validated via experiment. Again though, SolitaryWalker incorrectly asserts that philosophy is purely about truth, rather than also accomplishing our inner desires, as he says how our prejudices (ironically from his own prejudice) pollute the truth. Some things however transcend truth, and that the ultimate meaning will be found within, with what is important to us and our beliefs, as reality is indeed shaped by our focus. He is gravely mistaken in asserting how philosophy does not keep in perspective any of our personal ends (the funny thing is though that he says personal growth follows from our inquiries, so in essence, he contradicts himself, since all along then it did indeed have a personal element). I do agree on his next point about forcefully dispelling ignorance being secondary to advancing ideas and offering the opportunity to learn. Again though, he aims to get solely at the truth, in rejection of all passions and inner desires. If anything, he needs to learn the critical distinction between passion and attachment, passion impelling us forward, and attachment restricting us, since passion is a vision of what we wish to be, but attachment is a lingering fog clouding our vision. Passion if used properly can be controlled, whereas attachment binds us by its strings and limits our personal freedom. His argument for philosophy and its power of explanation is indeed superior, as he correctly asserts, to the religious book of dogma. He then says how religion deals with questions incapable for rationalization, such as what happens when we die, which he claims cannot be reached by metaphysics. Again I am in disagreement, as if anything, nothing possesses greater power than the illumination reason can cast upon our world. All in all, SolitaryWalker has brought up some very interesting points, but we cannot accept any such assertions without a challenge.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Why I do not believe in God thread:
SolitaryWalker begins with an axiom about the Universe being infinite, and somehow links this with rendering the existence of God impossible independent of our world’s existence, and then defines infinity as the continuous, incessant flow of entities. He also thinks not all things in this world are continuous, in spite of facts and evidence to the contrary (Newton’s Laws of Motion, an elaborate cause-and-effect cycle from which everything must always follow from a previous state of being and necessarily transform into another state of being, a dynamic system always proven to “continuously” occur, these laws also very possibly applying in basic principle within the non-physical realm). This would, according to SolitaryWalker’s classifications, render all parts as comprising the same entity, and if so, it would follow that God exists in the infinity of all things within this world. At least SolitaryWalker detailed the implications of what God’s existence could mean, though because of his blunder regarding the continuum principle, he concluded (falsely) that God does not actually exist (and he is most likely right about a personal God being invalid, but he also rejects the existence of a God who manifests the infinite creative power of his mind within all things, even though his axiomatic reasoning described how such a God could exist). He says how a first cause that could have rendered our world’s existence possible must have been infinite, that is, it must have followed from the flow of a previous entity, and that entity another one, and so forth without arriving at an acceptable first cause (and if this entity is God, then we would ask who or what made God). But perhaps the point of greatest confusion would be to even arrive at a definition of what God is, whether he is a Creator, an infinite divine mind, or whatever else. SolitaryWalker says this world is an unconscious representation of the infinite realm, and that the finite limits of the human mind by which we are all designed translate the infinite into finite terms, that is, our minds only perceive a dim shadow of the much more luminous world above and beyond the current dimensions of our comprehension. SolitaryWalker says either God exists in this world, or not at all, and that no evidence in favor of his existence has been found, claiming it irreconcilable with the laws of nature. This philosophical world SolitaryWalker has created for himself contains restrictions of his own making, further evidenced in his assertion that the universe is a closed system of causation, which makes the laws of nature possible. Very interestingly though, he recognizes that this would mean if God existed, all things could be altered with his will, and then further says how the realm of the infinite could flow into the finite realm our minds perceive. Though SolitaryWalker concluded how the infinite intellect of God cannot exist outside of our known world, the conclusion I arrived at is inescapable – the higher levels of creation are liberated of all limitations.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's What I believe thread:
SolitaryWalker asks the question as to why people even ask big questions in the first place, such as, what is the meaning of life, what is truth, what is virtue? He postulates people do so to seek self-affirmation and comfort in a hostile world, and that everything we do is necessarily inspired by selfish motives. Surely though, the quest for enlightenment should transcend such things, as if life is just all about fulfilling our own comforts, then we would indeed be in a limited position. If anything, I would think we always need to be on the leading edge, as we push the artificial constraints our own minds have been contained by to the limit, the tenacious drive towards achieving complete self-mastery being far superior to seeking only mere satisfaction with our current conditions. SolitaryWalker claims whether it is a rationalist seeking truth, an artisan seeking entertainment, a guardian getting things done, or an idealist accommodating others, that it is all simply what makes them happy. I hold though that happiness is insufficient in advancing our own ends, since when we are happy, we are content with letting things be, without the motivation to change and transform our world into altered and improved states. But worse than anything so far said, SolitaryWalker arrogantly asserts how the artisan temperament only cares for energized entertainment and concrete activities without seeing what he perceives to be the big picture, and of course, he is wrong. Though, as a generalization, he is right about the interests of the artisan, his whole idea of such endeavors being inferior and short-sighted is a testament to his own ego, since he views what they do as unimportant and insignificant. All people play important roles in the progressive development of humanity, which SolitaryWalker would realize if he actually saw the big picture. Artisans are constant in their creations, just as guardians are dedicated to their duties, or how idealists are inscrutably awakening their imaginations, and the rationalists relentlessly focusing their reasoning, each of these feats coming together to produce the diverse and dynamic system of humanity, ever increasing in accomplishment towards the echelons of infinity. The next points risen however on our sense perceptions and how they present themselves in a finite way to the brain indeed seems to limit for us what can be experienced. Perhaps though there is an escape, as SolitaryWalker goes on to say that the internal world and its imaginative prowess may actually open the window to outside realms incapable for experience within the physical, and if so, it follows that only through intuition can the infinite be reached, as we look through the off limits zone behind the fence. I am in complete agreement with his conclusion on the meaning of life that it is the quest to achieve the highest degree of perfection possible. It is by perfecting our inner being that we will find full liberation from the finite world, perfection, to add my own opinion, consisting of a state without restrictions, as SolitaryWalker ends this section saying that our task in life is open-ended and aimed at infinity, and that this epic quest will never come to closure, as we strive for the unachievable.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's My Metaphysical System thread:
The pursuit of physics, as SolitaryWalker’s article says, should be able to solve the ultimate questions of cosmology, those being: what is the world, how does it work, who made the world, what is the purpose of the world, what is our purpose, what is the ultimate nature of reality, what is the mind, does it exist independently of the body, what is the ultimate stuff they are made of, and how does this fit into the larger cosmological framework? These questions could finally answer the mystery of what life is, what the universe is, how cosmology works, and how we are related to it. Clearly there is purpose to such questions, as they show that there is mystery in life, these things being currently incapable for reliable knowledge, and that these great life mysteries are identifiable, and although we do not know the nature of these mysteries, they can be speculated upon, even if reliable knowledge of them eludes us. These metaphysical questions could perhaps be experienced and understood within the realm of human imagination. Hence, there is epistemology, the study of knowledge, and metaphysics, the study of ultimate reality. We must have metaphysical beliefs in order to ask meaningful questions, which can be verified into epistemology by science. Though the ultimate reality may possess a changeless stability, there may be a mysterious, ever changing force trapped within the essence of things, constantly in motion. The ever-vibrating force of entities seems immune to change. In order to grasp the changeless then, one must have access to infinite and eternal vision. In our phenomenal world then, it seems we have a combination of change and changelessness, though a more sophisticated sight could consist in constant change. The way force vibrates could also be a diagram of how our minds that are within time tend to perceive what is changeless and outside of time. Perhaps materiality is just a construct of the way our minds perceive the ultimate reality of immateriality. Our real selves then may receive salvation with God in the kingdom of heaven as we break away from the phenomenal world and unite with our real beings. Through science man should find meaning.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Faith of a Rationalist thread:
People perceive the world as they see it through their confined perceptions, and as such, philosophers who dare to challenge the societal paradigms of their time, like Giordano Bruno (RaptorWizard’s favorite philosopher) or Benedict de Spinoza (SolitaryWalker’s favorite philosopher) were branded heretics, the first being burned at the stake, and the second receiving ridicule from the stupid multitudes. Our state of existence is so wretched that non-existence would be preferable to it, and as such, the world is by no means what Leibniz termed ‘the best of all possible worlds’. The unspeakable suffering of mankind cannot be denied. Mankind is ever in search for a life of paradise. We must then increase our perception on the problem of evil, the essence of knowledge and how salvation could possibly be achieved. I as of right now oppose the proposition that we see beauty everywhere in this world, incapable for our grasp. Perhaps perfection only exists in the heavens, a realm currently outside our comprehension. If we were to all enter paradise, surely its perfection would proliferate under the happiness we would all share together, rather than losing its perfection upon our entrance, as SolitaryWalker incorrectly asserts. SolitaryWalker says salvation comes only when the intellect takes primacy over the will, and that the will is in motion, the will being the foundation to all existence. He also thinks that not even the brightest of us will access full truth and knowledge, but if nothing is even true or false, understanding even to begin with could perhaps only be found in empiricism. Some would also hold enlightenment to be a vision of the world objective and independent of prejudice, and that we must not deem the world to be what we can accept via personal taste, the limits of our vision not indeed being the limits of the world. The real universe is outside our perception, the poverty of our imaginations perceiving the infinite existence as finite. Perhaps everything exists only in the way we with our vision perceive the thing to be, in accordance with our reasoning faculties. Matter as well as all things nonphysical may be manifestations of a fluctuating force, a will objectifying itself. Perhaps the point of greatest importance is that the way we perceive the world will always be finite as long as we impose restrictions upon it. Spinoza’s doctrine of salvation comes through contemplation. We must believe reason to be the light of the world, the ultimate end of philosophy.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's God, Public Morality and Evolution thread:
SolitaryWalker begins by asking perhaps the biggest question in existence: what is God? He says God by tradition is often seen as an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent being. Such extraordinary qualities however put God’s identity as a person into question. He also under his doctrine demands worship over personal achievement, but worse yet choosing the dark path of Satan. SolitaryWalker conceives human beings who show genuine compassion to often be incompetent in logical analysis and objectivity, and that the inner quest to perfect all things would be a heavy burden, like for a being who mastered light to also master darkness. Really though, I conceive it to be possible to achieve a perfect balance between such opposites, should we see things from all angles, reference points, and which from the contrast, we could divine our knowledge. God with all of his supreme knowledge is also commonly depicted as the symbol for supreme power, as infinite greatness is also often equated with a person of sublime power. I agree perfectly with SolitaryWalker on his point of how Carl Jung said that in our philosophical, scientific, and theological studies, we gain more insights into the workings of our minds rather than the workings of the world. We project ourselves onto what we see and in effect anthropomorphize all things. Plato argues the average man must be lied to in order to keep them from falling off the safe path, a tactic I for one would not subscribe to, for not only should the truth be free, but it should also set us free. SolitaryWalker is right in regards to God and the way we see him having been the cause for corruption all throughout human history, how manipulative people have twisted ideas in service of external agendas. SolitaryWalker in regards to God concludes that he is best defined as the primary essence of spirituality, or the other world, and then asks if it is possible for us to know the other world. He follows by asking what was the beginning of the universe, and that if A created B, asking what created A, rendering A incapable for a Creator, assuming that it could not have come from nothing. This may mean it has always existed, without beginning or end. This view of time could be defined as the infinite realm, a view from which all things could be seen.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Problem of religion thread:
Religion could be defined as an ethical doctrine, a world cosmology independent of empiricism, a spiritual eschatology, and fundamentalism. The fundamental beliefs religion harbors in these areas incapable for change could discourage critical thought, encouraging people to believe their views are unquestionable. Religion could thereby discourage people from being open-minded, which could compel them to only deem themselves and the sacred texts of their divine authority right. As such, they are caught completely off-guard when presented with critical opinions conflicting with their own. They so aggressively defend these irrational stances, despite facts and evidence as well as reasoning to the contrary, since if they do, the religion promises them greater reward to come. Such religious stances have and could continue to entail violence. We must instead follow the following:
1. The requirement is not to change the system, but rather the people.
2. The measure of man based on the state of our planet is pathetic. We need to change the nature of humanity to rise above and beyond.
3. The spread of information would help establish world peace, it resulting as a natural consequence of universal enlightenment vision.
4. When discussing global issues, we must put personal prejudice aside.
5. Individuality is a point of great importance independent of the environment.
6. The ancients were misguided due to lack of technology, though the world could become greater in our lifetime, despite doubters. We must achieve a perfect community stretching across the Earth with universal acceptance and individuality.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Typology as a philosophical discipline thread:
We must wonder whether typology is even a logically consistent enough of a system to accurately order people into set psychological categorizations to begin with, let alone adaptable enough to account for the vast diversity of people in the world. Due to external factors and conditioning, perhaps one could act contrary to their true nature, their true personality, and even test as such. After all, people can indeed act differently than their natural personality would dictate, based on adjusting to the environment. Due to this lack of behavioral consistency, one can conclude Keirsey’s typology to be incomplete, which is based solely on behavior. If even a fully self-mastered man were to accomplish qualities stereotypically associated with different types, the foundations would further fissure. Perhaps though, the psychological states of people and the patterns of their reasoning as well as thought dynamics could be greater concepts from which to construct a typology, founded from a philosophical framework. Philosophy could be defined as a primarily conceptual and abstract study of the world, asking such questions as follows:
1. Is it possible for the mind to divine free will, to control cause and effect?
2. What is the nature of consciousness, the ways in which we see and perceive things?
3. What is the ultimate nature of reality, the existential system designing all creation?
4. What are the foundations of thought, the forge from which the mind constructs?
These questions all address the mental makeup of an individual, and as such, these things are more difficult to directly detect. Typology is thereby a study of solidified patterns of thought, and one’s natural tendencies, not consistently contingent with environmental circumstances.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Universal Feel? thread:
SolitaryWalker asks whether a universal moral law should be imposed upon all people, termed universal feel. There are 3 different arguments we can approach this with: if we must correct those who act wrongly, if there is no choice but to correct them, of even if wrong choose not to do so. Perhaps certain experiences throughout a person’s life have shaped what these values and what violates them are. Some may even divert greater focus on well-reasoned thought-experiments rather than value centered-thought. We must then see how creative and idiosyncratic visionaries construct their worldviews. Certainly many mystics across the globe have already conceptualized what many may deem impossible. Many who see themselves as right often try to change other’s opinions to match their own. These people will tend to think negatively of those who disagree. The accumulation of such feelings may lead to hostility. Due to these possible contingent consequences, an established system of ethics may be a mistaken idea.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Theorem of Feel thread:
SolitaryWalker wonders how desirable it is for people to believe in things that are not supported by an argument. He begins by describing the process of logic, saying it deals with chains of reasoning. The formalities behind logic seem like mathematical operations, a much more abstract and theoretical discipline than the dynamic and transformative discipline of cosmology, in which case I support the latter discipline while SolitaryWalker seems to prefer the former. One thing that both disciplines have in common though is that when they show us our short-comings, few are able to do so without simultaneously losing self-respect. However, even the most disciplined among us will wish for a brighter future, perhaps putting too much faith in beliefs like karma. This feel method has been historically a consistent craft of manipulation of others to their delusion and detriment, even in service of altruistic causes.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's I am an atheist but... thread:
Do we really wish to destroy the popular myths of society in order to enlighten and awaken people? Although I believe the truth should be accessible to everyone, some may be disturbed by new discoveries, and their emotions may override their rationality. Perhaps one such belief that may be dangerous to dispel is the anthropomorphized view of God. If one were however to sufficiently handle the truth, it could result in inner peace and less mistakes, since we would have proper knowledge and beliefs by which we can direct ourselves, since if we take the right actions, then good consequences should follow. As such, false beliefs could lead in the wrong direction. As of now, man obeys the laws of nature (perhaps the progressive development of man could change that). If then we wish to control the laws of nature, every man must receive universal enlightenment.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Essence of Human nature thread:
Sartre says we are defined by the choices we make and how we deal with the consequences, and that bad faith is our restraint from improving our circumstances. It would follow that we could counter all adversity through pure resolution of will, which SolitaryWalker says cannot be the case due to the limits of human power. He says Sartre’s false belief could have sprung from his own overestimation of individual freedom, as Sartre says all choices spring from within. SolitaryWalker next defines human nature as unalterable dispositions that inhere within our psyche. He says the strongest of such tendencies is the will to feel good; making an axiom that feeling good is the foundation of human nature. This drive for well-being likely led to the evolution of our faculties enabling human survival, such as walking, breathing, or language. Machiavelli is quoted as saying that people are fickle by nature and will stand by you if you are winning, but once you cease to be winning, they shall abandon you. It follows that people will only employ positive sentiments to their advantage, more often than not. The greatest fear man possesses is annihilation, and as such, will commonly go further than necessary to preserve his well-being. As such, many believe God to be a means of attaining eternal life. Such potential divine reward will inspire many men to act positively.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Essence of Apriori thread:
SolitaryWalker asks if it is possible to have knowledge prior to experience. This could be possible if knowledge is innate, that is, if it is stored in our unconscious. If so, we could not only acquire knowledge, but also recover it. He defines knowledge as a true set of beliefs from which we can refer to choose. He also asks to ask to what degree one’s natural talents result from what is innate versus one’s influence from the external world. Newton saw the world as a dynamic machine of cause and effect, from which point A leads to B from which follows C to result in D and so forth. This view however cannot explain the source from which the first cause came, a question of how something could have come from nothing. Our minds translate the infinite realm into finite terms, which make such questions that impose limits incapable for explanation.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Origin of Feeling thread:
SolitaryWalker defines feeling as a cognitive faculty of emotive valuation, concerned with how we relate to the external environment, not how it is, thereby rendering feeling subjective. This could cause us to attach anthropomorphic qualities to things, a personal touch. This urge likely developed within man throughout our evolution as a means of self-preservation, to identify life-threatening dangers in the external environment. As a result our feeling has become stronger.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's On the virtues of passion thread:
SolitaryWalker says aesthetical judgments primarily reflect how we feel about things, which in turn he believes will effect who we are. As such, art could be seen as an expression of ourselves, an aesthetical reflection of our emotions and inner state. These emotionally charged impulses he claims are in complete opposition to analytical thinking. I disagree, as our thinking I believe should ultimately be a foundation from which our feelings can manifest and create a meaningful world for us, which is why thinking without feeling is like matter without energy. He further claims the wise and lofty will choose analytical subjects devoid of passion, such as mathematics, even though mathematics assigns limits to things, whereas passion breathes fire into the equations.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Popularization of Philosophy thread:
Rather than connecting the ideas developed by all the great philosophers into a greater whole, I would advise a less holistic point of view. Instead, we should at least be open to all those ideas, but we should also tenaciously chase those that fit our ideals in a radical and less balanced drive to fulfill our visions. Most importantly of all however, is to create our own individualized philosophy, and to walk the solitary paths of our own planning ahead.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's On the Human condition thread:
SolitaryWalker postulates that people are naturally driven towards self-affirmation; that we wish to feel good, doing what we believe leads to our well-being. I will say though that some things transcend immediate pleasures, and that some will make monumental sacrifices at the cost of their own well-being in this life to uplift the human condition. Also, those who choose not to be happy and content with the current state of things will have greater motivation to transform it for the better. He also criticizes others for seeking affirmation from the various people in their life, which I think is a misconception, since if a belief of ours gains greater universal acceptance, then it can be implemented on a global scale. Ideally, we should have a means by which we can all agree.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Utility of Philosophy thread:
Philosophy can be used as a model for science, the pure idea being tested and refined empirically. Science will give us the results of this process, and then philosophy can next synthesize the pieces together to form a greater product by constructing a blueprint of its unified design. This can help us solve the monumental problems of our future horizons, should we take the correct steps of action in our present position.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's How I think we ought to live our lives thread:
Religion is a means by which many find a life purpose and develop a cosmological map of the world as well as developing ethical systems and seeking what lies beyond this life. A critical weakness within religion however, is that all of these views are to be accepted on authority without question. SolitaryWalker defines this as faith which, according to believers, must be followed, lest the Gods unleash their divine wrath! He says that rather than blindly believing what we falsely perceive to be immortal wisdom, we must follow the liberating light of truth on a philosophical search for meaning. Meaning is found in independent thinking and letting our true self’s light shine.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's What is spirituality? thread:
SolitaryWalker defines spirituality as a quest for another world, which he thinks suggests that these experiences transform spiritual prophets from within. Perhaps this could mean minds that are guided by the stars above are filled with celestial light which they can reflect upon their creations and make them sparkle with incessant fluctuations of world form, that is, finding a greater life purpose can be a quest in which we ascend to the zenith, a position of perfection from which we would have a higher perspective from which our reality can be seen and shaped anew. God is the greatest possible good but, unlike SolitaryWalker says, good fables lead to God.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Problem of Religious bigotry thread:
We will fulfill much life purpose in the open-ended quest to construct our own worldviews. It will not be found as a gift to us from someone else of a simplistic design. Those who are content are in a state of rest, a static and unchanging position which resists the currents of change. Change is the only constant factor ever present within the world. It makes life grow and lets creation take shape. These incessant transformations are the driving force in the progressive development of civilization and mankind.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's What is God? thread:
God is the greatest possible good. Such a concept is beyond the anthropomorphized image of God most people of primitive times always tried to project upon the divine. SolitaryWalker thinks however that this renders revelation impossible, which assumes God cannot talk to people, but at least SolitaryWalker says perhaps prophets could translate their connection with the infinite realm. Revelation I believe could come from a non-anthropomorphized source, which could perhaps transform the unconscious mind from within. Such an example may be an all omnipresent living mind which sees everything and from which all things spring into being. Should this belief hold any realistic quality to it that exists in the world, it would imply a deep connection shared amongst every mind in the universe, and our universe with whatever other worlds may be. We could all be unified with the divine as agents of co-creation. Revelation could come from any mind in existence, should we tap into this inscrutable source and the power it may give to those who seek it on their journeys, as they strive to live with purpose. This source is not necessarily God, since not all of creation is good enough.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's In search for a better understanding thread:
In the search for understanding, 4 questions we tend to ask include the meaning of eschatology, death, immortality, and what the alpha and omega of all things shall be. In discovering the treasures such great questions have in store for us, we seem to consistently find the world is greater than previously conceived, from the round earth, to the solar system centered around the sun, to the universal expansion from the big bang, and next perhaps other universes or planes of existence outside our own. Our focus should not be to divide things into absolute qualities like true and false, but rather to open our minds and let our imaginations take shape. All things conceptualized by the mind may have a certain level of reality to them beyond existent and non-existent, the existent perhaps being the world of stability, and the non-existent maybe being the world of possibility. This is why our focus should unlock the transcendent power of the mind, lifted above and beyond the mundane limitations of this plane. SolitaryWalker believes the key to the world to come is this world first. As a starting point, we must not assign limits to a world larger than our present comprehension. SolitaryWalker then goes on a long rant about how traditionalist personality types thrive on secure boundaries in suspension of critical and rational analysis, implying he believes his own personality type (probably INTP) to be vastly wiser and superior. Such arrogance blinds the mind and restricts the alternate possibilities. He is right however in saying that we should never stop questioning what we believe, as our ideas can always be altered into higher forms. Perhaps if our wills became sufficiently powerful, they could transcend the system and become free forces.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's What is truth (split from post poll) thread:
SolitaryWalker says we impose our perceptions on the world, that we see illusions similar enough to one another that we each see relatively the same physical objects. He also postulates the world may hold codes for its design that could be symbolized with languages like mathematics, and although I side with him in his general codifications theory, I believe mathematics is too definitive and absolute in its measures to embrace the endless possibilities present in the world. He also defines truth as our perceptions aligning with the outside universe, which would imply the mind transcends truth, the mind possibly having a higher reality to it that perhaps could flow outwardly and become truth. This would, in a sense, make some truth subjective, as its creation may have sprung from our own visions and dreams, unlike SolitaryWalker says. He believes to the contrary, since he holds reality is just there and incompletely translated into an imperfect understanding, whereas I have faith that, should our wills reach the right heights in power, that we could at a much higher level of alteration create the very essence of our lives and what we experience as reality. For me the world holds infinite promise for us.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Way to inner peace thread:
As a means for finding inner peace, which SolitaryWalker thinks helps to find our true-self, we must have an introspective focus on the world inside the mind. He and Spinoza also believe we are all parts of God, so when we look within ourselves, we can see the timeless and infinite essence of the divine. He says though that we should not live for ourselves, but rather we should live for God. Instead, I believe in self-mastery, and that our ultimate purpose is to attempt the great and impossible.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Mephistopheles? thread:
If we go back to the Garden of Eden story, God commanded Adam and Eve not to partake of the Fruit of Knowledge. They ate of the fruit despite the warning, and then their eyes were opened. The cost however is that they would ultimately perish, and that to postpone this, they would have to work to survive and suffer against pitiless elements. The implications of this are very difficult to see clearly, but I will speculate that there could be some higher power that wants life, at least at this level of existence, to be obedient and toiling slaves to the natural order, or perhaps it could also be challenging life to become stronger on a journey through the eons, even if the means of its accomplishment leads to suffering. In each of these instances, knowledge would aid us in our progressive development to overcome these systems, since it could give us the power we need to rise above our lowly stations, but this resistance could also bounce back upon us with greater adversity. I know not how long we shall have to endure this pain, whether it will last for 1 lifetime on earth, or if we will continue to face it for many lives to come, but the question of how to transcend this could be discovered in the finality and annihilation of all things physical. This world may be corrupted beyond repair, so to heal it, ruin may have to be unleashed upon it, for by destroying the old world, new worlds could be spawned by the will of life, worlds with ideal designs. In this way the problem of evil potentially could be ended. I make no unalterable claim that this is the direction life needs to take in the eons to come, or that such a momentous feat is even achievable, though it remains clear that we are in desperate need of a global transformation that life creates.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's Dreams? thread:
Perhaps dreams may be reflections of our true self, visions of something that is important to us inside. They could open our awareness to worlds separated from the physical, allowing us to see things from a higher perspective. Not only though would dreaming access the other dimensions of creation, but also might manifest new things into creation, springing from the will of the mind. This would imply a chaotic realm, in which things could be altered; vastly different from the physical world that follows natural laws. The dream world then possibly is limitless, which would render all things possible. Here then if a person wished to move mountains, they would tremble at the sound of voice and crack asunder at command. That though was a mundane example. A highly developed dream world may be vastly different from the physical world, not only in restrictions, but also in appearance. This is why fables have values we make real and live.
RaptorWizard's responce to SolitaryWalker's My Religion thread:
My religion, should I invent a good one, will chart the course for eternal life, world peace, universal enlightenment, and ultimate power. I do not expect the ideal visions for these lofty goals to be fully accomplished while I am here. I have not even discovered the directions we should follow to walk the ways in search of our destiny. This time may prove to be the most critical moment in human history that there ever was or will be, as the actions we take now will effect whether we start the fires of our own destruction, or expand to spheres beyond the terrestrial in an epic ascension to the heavens. I will wish now for a future sparkling with stars and rainbows dancing and singing with life.
I cleave the heavens and soar to the infinite.
And while I rise from my own globe to others
And penetrate ever further through the eternal field,
That which others saw from afar, I leave far behind me.
Giordano Bruno (On the Infinite Universe and Worlds, 1584)

[14Raptor19]

What is beauty? What is love?
Beauty is when the flow of life becomes in synch with treasures of the higher, the bubble of growth and wisdom. We ask a lot of questions about how things should be, and reinvent masks of God's charm reflected as the source of all knowledge to put into pixel the stardust of luster. Then there's also Bunny as Love, timeless, everlasting, sublime, masterful, feathery, radiant, and She paints the storybook rollercoaster with hamburgers and hot dogs at the carnival. With Bunny, choice, free will, liberty, independence, language, the full spectrum of human to alien swirl invites the Christmas tree to juggle the donuts of universal control. The universe can be imported into our minds for the full exploration of human consciousness, from splitting the timeframe, to hijacking the bird's eye view of God, or coiling up with the ghost of all learning.


What are your most important values?
Wonder, a sense of pure, enigmatic, characterized, rushing exhilaration to capture nature and possibility bounding and returning with ever increasing power for expanding the puzzle picture of life and beyond, all the way to the cornucopia of progress and installation of the philosophical white hole in time as the Thunderbolt Singularity.


Do you have any sort of spiritual/religious beliefs, and why do you hold (or don't) those beliefs in the first place?
I believe in saving existence, like we're part of a failed Omniverse that needed to fissure away from the old doomed world we created at younger ages, so this involves building the kingdom of Bunny, feeling Love just diving into the chamber of conquest and obliteration of any stone or crushing gravitational well for aiming our heads at an apex of churning algorithms, like how I have a number code on My EagleFangKarate website that positions every drill of routine and chocolate stamps for eradicating the true darkness.

[14Raptor19]

Tolkien is very good for igniting a sense of awe or blessed dive into the heavenly whisper of the country rainbow, like a land of fun in the sun awaits your arrival for blowing out the birthday candles and opening the window to bright parties and celebration, kind of like how all of the characters (especially in the books) like singing and eating at buffet gatherings.


Middle Earth seems about human liberty, human compassion, human endurance, and this fable of spirit has an archetype, Gandalf, where the story comes to life, and wisdom from the most eternal dragon-fire graces the wing's fringes.


I think Gandalf was an INTJ. He was orderly, enforcing, mystical, giving people their free will and independence, had a deep understanding of human nature, and I even talked to Gandalf before, I man named Zang. Here's the axioms that I wrote from talking to him 8 years ago in 2013:




1. We need to see things by asking questions. – This helps us to achieve an understanding.
2. We are not in Heaven. – We have to work our way towards Heaven.
3. Our honor must be at the divine level for us to be in Heaven. – Otherwise it would be destroyed by our corruption.
4. We each have a life force. – Our energy incarnates into physical forms from the timeless world.
5. Life is an everlasting progression. – Life progresses by triumphing over challenges (hell).
6. This world is hell. – Hell teaches us lessons throughout many lifetimes.
7. The material world exists at a low frequency (in reference to higher frequency realms). – We can rise to higher frequency realms as we gain more experience across the spectrum.
8. We are spiritually evolving. – Our planet is presently at the edge of a spiritual shift, which will develop us for space exploration.
9. I am that I am. – This character is the personal God of love.
10. Love is the one force. – Everything is part of love, which makes things possible.
11. How should we pray to God? – With the force and feeling of our true character.
12. What can God give us? – The complete potential for an endless future.
13. What should we ask for when we pray to God? – To expand our awareness and vision of things (like seeing dreams or revealing secrets).
14. Belief is at the center of our being. – This force (love) can give us anything and point the way to everything.
15. The power of belief can “create entities”. – Opinions spring from a growing pool and can form any substance, making all things (even mental constructs) in some sense a reality.
16. Reality is countered by destructive forces. – They seek to bring things into the void.
17. Existence began with a witness. – The witness made everything possible with the “word” (logos [reason]; the “codes” of creation).
18. The first thing created was love (no thing). – From this came the limitless and the witness (the force of love), which gave shape to everything out of the formless void.
19. Reason is driven by love (the good). – This shows us beauty, which is relative to how we see it.
20. Creation has 3 points. – They are existence, structure, and direction.
21. Space (structure) and time (direction) make up 5 dimensions. – This is because existence itself is a dimension.
22. The higher dimensions of creation (above the basic 5) are metaphysical. – We are stuck in the effects and cannot (at the physical level of existence) see the cause of it all.
23. Knowledge gives us greater freedom. – It is the driving force that empowers mental constructs, which gives birth to life and love.
24. Intention is the fruit of life. – It is what we want and the cause that creates it.
25. Perfection can be found by following God. – God is the transcendent cause of creation, the designer of this “existential game” that can maximize our attributes and “level us up”.
26. The logos are the language of reality. – They are the digital characters of the matrix.
27. We are all avatars of God. – We should let him guide our actions without resistance.
28. We will triumph with God on our side. – He can create possibilities for anything.
29. The system of reality is dynamic. – Everything is always growing from the immaterialness of nothing to become the synthesized complex of everything.
30. Mind controls the movement of life. – It is the action that feeds all reactions.
31. The divine mind (God) is connected to everyone. – We are each multifaceted prisms that reflect the light of God, eternally expressing himself through our own true characters.
32. The pure forms of ideas constitute what is real. – They are the dreamed up images created by the divine mind.
33. We cannot yet bear the sublime truth. – It would be unjust to reveal before our corrupted beings.
34. Knowledge liberates our will. – We need an objective point, an external standard to give the will its freedom.
35. Asking the “why” of the “will” connects it to knowledge. – It is our grasp of what we want.
36. What should we do if we are everything? – We start by gazing upon the world; we make new laws and different manifest copies of ourselves to actualize the chronicles of history.
37. Entities can help to realize the will of God. – We must take action for our will to be done.
38. Many possible world models could have existed. – This world always existed, and it is continually moving through different dimensions.
39. There is a war being waged within the divine order. – It has brought chaos to the timeless harmony of Heaven.
40. We need a focus on hope. – We must know why we want things to be and have an outline with the steps of action to realize the plan.
41. We should ask what is right before commanding. – As the moral arbiters of things, we need to see the good and decide accordingly.
42. Things change when thought of differently. – The right clarity of thought expands reality.
43. The divine can be seen in the mundane. – It can connect us to real esoteric truth.
44. Asking for the why can give us the power to do anything. – It gives us the directional will to create what could be, to focus and unleash our energies charged from within.
45. Why something will be is immaterial. – The something (an immanent creation) starts within the same plane as the immaterial (the sea of chaos), tamed and shaped by free will.
46. Society must be broken and revolutionized. – The system could be destroyed and redesigned from within.
47. We need a blueprint to start society anew. – It should be a dynamic and large scale model, where every part of the societal machine interconnects together in perfect unison.
48. Power must justify itself. – People in power must serve the subjects.
49. An entity must be able to mentally construct creations to be alive. – This is power of will.
50. We need a bridge to get where we want to go. – Looking up is easier than flying.

[14Raptor19]

INTP:
1) Bathroom Dodger - They are so obsessed with geeky hobbies like video games, that they don't even go to / forget to use the bathroom!!
2) Abstract Daydreamer - They live almost solely in the world of the mind, thinking about things all day!!
3) Extreme Engineer - A more poster version of INTP, they are really good at academics, math, and science.*
4) Mad Musician - Perhaps the most common kind of INTP, they are very lazy, don't usually care, and are into extreme thrills, maybe even a street philosopher.*
5) Final Annihilator - Perhaps the Ultimate of all types, they are so unrealistic, farfetched, radical, calculating, that they will never stop until they're the lords of existence and beyond, even into Imagination!!* (RaptorWizard)


ISTP:
1) Jock - Good at sports.
2) Mechanic - Good with engineering.
3) Nerd - Eccentric.
4) Bum - Stasis oriented and hedonistic.
5) Daredevil/Scoundrel - Never tell Me the odds!!


INFP:
1) Storybook Character - Basically like My Bunny Angel, enjoying fiction, fluffy things, cute things, cuddly things, adorable things, you get the picture!!
2) Drama Displayer - INFPs that like to fit in socially, perhaps the closest version to ISFP.
3) Smart Scholar - They are very wise, intellectual, into education, and independent study (My Mom is this type)!!*
4) Avenging Activist - Trying to make a difference in the real world and heal injustice.
5) Knight of Faith - Believing in high minded philosophical ideals and the essential Hero (like Luke Skywalker)!!*


INTJ:
1) Sage - Interested in all things metaphysical and connecting to God or the Divine Source of Love, you get the picture.
2) Scientist - The ultimate rationalist, they question everything, and yet they are also open to new ideas.
3) Creator - Building inventive novelties and fiction in a very original and magical way.
4) Achiever - Basically like Kobe Bryant or Zarathustra, working their tails off to actualize/realize the impossible/incredible.
5) Mastermind - Sort of like Final Annihilator INTP, yet smarter, more realistic, more long range, more planned out, less frenzied, and potentially more evil (maybe not in a I don't care way, but in a controlling way), like Emperor Palpatine!

[14Raptor19]

THE LIST ( The 24 INTP Subtypes by John Rieping. Copyright and stuff.)




P-type – The Improvisers




PNTI – “quantum mechanic” - This subtype uses a wild intellectual instinct to perfect systems, whether they were the originator or not. The weak TI creates ambivalence towards identity and logic.
PNIT - "context jumper” (mashup) - The other PN. This subtype tends towards comparing seemingly incompatible systems. They thrive on unorthodox metaphors.
PINT - "secret courtesan" (mother of pearl) - The first of our identity-strong subtypes, they court several identities at once without thought of consistency. This subtype also has the ability to form cyst-like gems of radiant wisdom around microscopic irritants.
PITN - "reed in the wind" (ninja) - Skilled in the evasive arts, these are one of the physical subtypes. Their sense of physical evasion echoes in the chameleon nature of their soul.
PTNI - "cold shower" ("reality check") - With the inherent paradox of being a T-strong perceiver, this subtype excels in efficiently reducing systems to the simplest metaphor. This activity can be sobering.
PTIN - "collector" - The second in the physical/material subtype, the PTIN collects ideas into a centerless framework.




N-type – The Speculators




NPIT -- "niche maker" – This subtype tends to create systems starting from a specific example, creating the framework to fit the criteria of the intuition-object. They want to find a place for everything, and a frame big enough for everyone.
NPTI -- "mediator" – With a kind, agreeable nature, this subtype wants to classify and sort much like the NPIT, but tries to do this from within whichever system is dominant.
NIPT – "social hacker" (“virus”) – This identity subtype tries to infect others with a prevailing thought in order to create self-replicating satellites. The best memes are created by the NIPT.
NITP -- "specialist" -- The first of our value-heavy subtypes, the NITP creates an identity through adherence to usually one thought-style or system-style (one that may evolve slowly over the years), finding the similarity of all things within this framework.
NTIP – "armchair general" – This is the first of the two flipped rationals. This subtype plays to win, and may not even realize not everyone shares that attitude. An NTIP will usually win long before playing the game, having created and/or perfected the gaming system.
NTPI – "arcologist" – The other of the flipped rationals, the NTPI tends towards creating utopian architectures. It does this out of a strong intuition of global truth.




I-type – The Solipsists




INTP – "manifesto" – With a strong sense of values and identity, this subtype leads to a greater truth by quiet example.
INPT – Bodhidharma – This subtype, the second of the hermit-like INs, seeks to transcend personality through calm reflection or meditation.
IPNT -- Deadhead (Tolkienite) – Like long-simmering hippies, this subtype tends to quietly yearn for a simpler existence, usually involving nature or anachronism.
IPTN – "gamer" ("pothead") – This subtype uses themselves as the basic element in their fantasy worlds. Consequently, they tend to make self-indulgent frameworks to inhabit.
ITNP – "slow burn" (Ubermensch) – This subtype wants to have the most unbiased perception possible, but in order to achieve this must constantly rethink and slowly obliterate any personal association that might fetter objectivity. The ITNP can get caught in an endless judging-perceiving cycle of re-examination.
ITPN – "reset button" – This subtype has all the identity strife of the ITNP, but tends to externalize it as a concrete activity of some kind. The two ITs tend to be the most objective of all the subtypes, because they constantly force themselves to face their faults.




T-type – The Editors




TNIP – "global paradox" – One of two pure rationals, the TNIP has a knack for boiling anything down to a single metaphorical paradox.
TNPI – "saboteur" (“survival of the fittest”) – The second of the pure rationals, the TNPI tends to find a favored heuristic with which to destroy any system. This subtype prefers to destroy in service of a stronger whole, which it ironically knows will never be perfect or complete.
TIPN – Ourobouros – This artistic subtype tends to be always destroying and creating itself, finding an identity in the process of constant self-creation. This is like a mellower version of the IT subtypes (ITNP and ITPN).
TINP -- "silver bullet" (Kryptonite) – This subtype tends to be always searching for the Achilles' heel of a system, and appreciates being recognized as the person who brought it down.
TPIN – "stress test" – This subtype is the pure analyst who succeeds in dispassionately running simulations in their mind. These are potentially the best visualizers out of all the 384 subtypes.
TPNI – "actuary" – This subtype is the most ambivalent of INTP identity subtypes as well as the most logical. The pure debater.


The Nesters
INFP - “martyr” - In this mood, the INFP tends to sacrifice themselves in an effort to promote their particular sense of truth.
INPF - Don Quixote of La Mancha - Like a more refined version of the “martyr,” an INFP in this mood tends to turn their very identity into a metaphor for the truth they promote.
IFNP - “transcendentalist” - This isolation-prone mood tends to idealize simplicity and a-rationality.
IFPN - “sentimentalist” - A combination of strong sensory and feeling preference makes this mood prone to collecting various objects to symbolize emotional states and periods in time.
IPFN - Bilbo Baggins (“master of baths”) - The combination of a highly fluid identity and relative sensory preference in this mood means the INFP likes an inordinate quantity of alone time.
IPNF - “monk” - Stasis and detachment tend to mark this mood. Often mistaken for an INTP.
+ + +




The Manipulators
NIPF - “Jedi master” (“Sith lord”) - An INFP in this mood may create concord or discord without appearing involved. Their motives remain inscrutable. Of the INFPs mistaken for INTPs, this is the most dangerous from an INTP perspective.
NIFP - “crusader” - Much like the “Jedi master”, but with a strong sense of right and wrong, this mood excels at intuiting the motives of others.
NFIP - “evangelist” - An INFP in this mood is like a more extraverted “crusader,” and uses this power to make large groups of people feel good or bad.
NFPI - “performance artist” (Lady Gaga) - This mood generally manifests as an “evangelist” turned up to 11 on a scale of 1 to 10, and may make others uncomfortable.
NPFI - “flower power” (“Zen seminar disruptor”) - They want to mediate, but tend to rely on the single answer: “We’re all one, man!”
NPIF - Noah (“zookeeper”) - Likely to notice and include those left out by others, an INFP in this mood collects personalities into elaborate menageries of potential. Everyone has a place in the grand scheme of life.
+ + +




The Daydreamers
PINF - “philosopher” (“false INTP”) - Those of this especially calm and absentminded mood may mistakenly claim the type that fits their feelings about themselves the best, the INTP.
PIFN - “angry aesthete” (“lover of beauty”) - Tying their identity to art, an INFP in this mood is angry about the very existence of art of low quality. Unfortunately, they’re usually right.
PFIN - Elliot Smith (“lyricist”) - This poetic mood combines skill with words and patterns to express feelings in writing or song that would be more difficult or uncomfortable to say in a plainer fashion.
PFNI - Stevie Nicks (“collaborator”) - More extraverted than a “lyricist”, an INFP in this mood will usually rely on help from others to promote their agenda, whatever that may be. Lucky for us, it’s usually artistic.
PNFI - Totoro - An INFP in this mood knows that the possibility for dreamy cuddles is endless. Just don’t piss them off.
PNIF - Bukowski - I told you not to piss Totoro off. An INFP in this mood is more comfortable with combining seemingly incompatible things (at least in the eyes of others) and less averse to conflict than usual for the INFP type.
+ + +




The Nurturers
FINP - “moralist” (“counselor”) - The SJ of the INFP universe, an INFP in this mood carries a very robust moral code and is not shy about expressing it.
FIPN - “veterinarian” (“caretaker”) - Healers in every sense of the word, these are like the “moralist”, but they tend to focus on the physical body of the “patient” first.
FNIP - Samwise Gamgee (Snuggie) - An INFP in this mood is always trying to find simple solutions to the emotional turmoil in people’s lives. Once they find such solutions, they try to apply them wherever possible.
FNPI - “cuddle puddle” (“champion”) - This nurturer tends to use their very personality as an emotional ointment for the troubles of their subject.
FPIN - “fur suit” (“cosplayer”) - An INFP in this mood is preoccupied with the possibilities for refined emotions. This can lead them to a variety of novel solutions for self- and group-expression.
FPNI - Care Bear - A less refined version of the “fur suit,” an INFP in this mood tries to craft novel emotional solutions for each separate relationship.


5w6 sx/soc - "The Mad Theorist." The most mentally intense of all types, a speculative imagination teams up with a visionary intellect to produce an eccentric style that cannot stop theorizing on the frontiers of science, envisioning alternate realities, or predicting the future. Fascinated by the paranormal, the unexplained, the six wing adds a sense of conspiratorial intrigue. They possess abundant nervous energy and are anxious to discharge their thoughts onto others, though the forcefulness of their ideas and sometimes frenzied delivery may overwhem their audience.




5w6 sx/sp - "From Another Planet." Less attracted to mundane science, more likely to be captivated by the unusual and complex universes that populate cutting edge sci-fi. Slow to trust but driven to engage with others, may offer hints about their secret interests to test a person's receptiveness. They share their private ideas and knowledge as a way to get closer. This tactic may unintentionally win them many friends, but leave them just as removed from any romantic prospects. Not as nerdish though a bit on the odd side, others may find them strangely appealing. Overall, the most atypical 5w6, can be mistaken for 5w4.




5w4 sx/sp "In their Own World" contributed by jase There's something oddly captivating about this Five, apt to wander through various conceptual worlds, as conceived in the minds of others, or of their own creation. They can appear perpetually sullen and immersed in emotional thought, giving the impression there's much more going on beneath the surface. This type of Five can easily be mistaken for a Four, though their range of expression is constricted. Curious about others though usually from afar, it's as if they're reserving themselves for the one element or person that would truly understand them. Despite intensity of desire, the sx instinct has difficulty asserting against the fearful inhibitions of the Five, along with the restrictive self pres close to the surface. They usually wait to be approached, but others should find them intriguing enough to initiate contact.




5w4 sx/so "Revolution" contributed by jase
The most creatively energized and outspoken of Fives, they conceive of outlandish and idealistic alternatives to a reality they find deeply unfulfilling for the most part, and like to exhibit these radical visions, possibly through an art form if not through direct advocacy. Many sx/soc 5w4's are responsible for revolutionizing their creative fields, for better or worse. They aren't always comfortable in the visionary roles they might find themselves in, and may escape to extended periods of withdrawal to regain a sense of independence and security. This kind of retreat can surprise those who have mistaken them for a more conventionally driven, extroverted personality.




5w4 so/sx Consultant courtesy of jase
Take the supreme intellectual arrogance of the social Five and give it a personalized, one to one touch, and you get your very own personal expert wannabe.




5w6 sp/sx contributed by jase
is the most private of Fives, not as emotionally detached but more socially oblivious. They would likely find their niche within a stable, low maintenance relationship, in a safe environment where they're insulated from the demands of others. They have an endearing quality uncommon to other Fives, so I see this type as more heavily Six winged.




5w6 sp/so "The Engineer". contributed by jase
Probably the furthest removed of all types from their own emotional life. The most practical minded and hardest working of Fives, prefer to work with complex physical systems over mere theory. In some ways this might be the purest version of Five.




5w6 so/sp "The Scientist" contributed by jase
the most hyper intellectual of all types, they value pure rational thought above all else. The most theoretical of Fives, not as hands-on experimental as the tinkering sp/soc 5w6, they seek to advance theory over technology. This may be the most recognized "face" associated with type Five, as seen in movies such as "A Beautiful Mind."




5w6 so/sx "The Goofball" contributed by jase
think of the main characters from "Revenge of the Nerds", a bunch of highly social, highly sexualized, irresponsible self pres lasters goofing off, at least that's how I remember it. This is probably the most Sevenish and outwardly humorous kind of Five, they value being smart but also want to be cool. I imagine several classic comedic performers were soc/sx 5w6.

[14Raptor19]

RaptorWizard on Fiction

[14Raptor19]

RaptorWizard Random Topics

[The Reality Denialist]

ILI, lol? Video seems to depict Ni imagery (Ni<->Si). Yet you seem to have plenty of Ne that spins from Ni vacuum.

The 24 INTP (<- that is Ni.)

[14Raptor19]

RaptorWizard 3 minute long speech Wisdom Mastery Solitude Wizard Lord

[14Raptor19]

What do the Pokemon numbers on the clock mean?
1 = Victory, Universal, Perfect
2 = Towards, Travelling, Together
3 = Rainbow, Light, Free
4 = Box, Present, Forever
5 = Celebrate, Explode, Hands
6 = Hell, Bottom, Satan
7 = Heaven, Imagination, Luck
8 = Will, Destiny, Ultimate
9 = Mountaintop, God, Bliss
10 = Extremities, Zidane, Tension
11 = Bunny (more than 2 1s is bad)
12 = Climax, End, Thunder
13 = Love, Hard, Soul
14 = Lugia
15 = Sabrina
16 = Meganium
17 = Bunny
18 = RaptorWizard, Evolution, Prime
19 = Slowking, RaptorWizard
20 = 2000, Lugia, Ginobili
21 = INTP, Ash
22 = Baby Lugia
23 = Rayquaza
24 = Kobe, Time
25 = Bunny, Father Crow
26 = Raichu Higher Self
27 = Security, Key, INTP
28 = Road, 2000, Raptor
29 = Final Annihilator
30 = Ash, Satan
31 = Internet, Matrix
32 = Transform
33 = Freemasonic/evil
34 = Big, Edge/sides
35 = God/Demiurge Lugia, Tom Montalk
36 = Unleashed, Unicorn
37 = Lightning
38 = Jason Kidd
39 = Transcendental Pinnacle
40 = Magic
41 = Lugia
42 = Time, Arrow
43 = Polarities, Big
44 = Forever, Artwork, One
45 = Nikola Tesla, Tom Montalk, Present
46 = Hell Forever
47 = ISTP, Heaven Forever
48 = Tyranitar, Raptor
49 = INTJ, Buddha
50 = Father Crow/Ho-Oh
51 = Mew, Bunny, Winner
52 = God's wings
53 = Lesser Meganium
54 = Celebrate Victory Forever, Meganium
55 = Prophecy
56 = Crown
57 = Rocket
58 = Star, Wish
59 = Volcano
60 = Rhydon, Michael Jordan
61 = Victory for the Horn
62 = Armaldo/Tom Montalk/Nikola Tesla
63 = Teleport
64 = Nintendo, Hell Forever
65 = Double Star
66 = ISTP, ESTJ, Chicago Bulls
67 = Higher Man, Ubermensch
68 = Champion, ENFP
69 = ISTJ, Faith, Psychic
70 = Misdreavus
71 = Ultimate Life Form
72 = Birth of Bunny
73 = Deoxys/Tom Montalk
74 = 2014 World Cup
75 = Escape
76 = Liberty
77 = Lawrence
78 = Barbie/My Little Pony
79 = Highest Man
80 = Domination
81 = Ultrarevolutionary Omniversalism
82 = Crossroads of Planetary Destiny
83 = Will's Rainbow
84 = Dragon Mind of Zen
85 = Celebi
86 = Super-Nexus
87 = INFJ
88 = Chains of Omega
89 = Light Side
90 = Fieldmarshal ENTJ Blastoise/Squirtle
91 = Overseer
92 = Splitting the Mountaintop of Prophecy
93 = Luke Skywalker
94 = Ghost
95 = Bruce Lee
96 = Zarathustra
97 = Joachim Low
98 = Mentality/Intensity
99 = Scizor, Raptor's System

[14Raptor19]

Another 3 minute long RaptorWizard video

[14Raptor19]

RaptorWizard on Bunny and the Rose Crown

[14Raptor19]

RaptorWizard stronger than any Man

[Braingel]

Seem Ti for sure to me. LSI or LII. My activator or Benefit relation.. Dual possibly if I was EIE-Ni, but comes issue with me being process and dialectical cognitive style.

[The Reality Denialist]

RaptorWizard stronger than any Man

I would say this is a textbook example of vortical-synergetic thinking if there was one.

[Braingel]

I would say this is a textbook example of vortical-synergetic thinking if there was one.

It seems as if he is doing it for reason of impression, though. I do not really see Fe creative, is the issue.. Ni sure, I can see argument for.. But we are stuck at lacking Te and Fe in high placement.. He could be an LSI maybe, but Se does not look all too strong.

[Braingel]

(I don’t see Fe creative in the videos is what I mean).

[Braingel]

If he was a beta, I would think it is LSI with suggestive Fe as strong.. But there comes issue with Se creative.. If he is an LSI, he would be creative variation.. But nothing about him seems remotely Fe high. He just has dramatic speech, and talks about what interests him.. As an autistic person my own self, it kind of seems more an autistic potential..

What is lacking on IEI for me on him is;
-Fe creative
-Se suggestive
-Ne ignoring (biggest issue)

I don’t think he ignores an intuitive function..

It also sounds like he repeats things of people he is fond of in way. That is not very Te PolR.

[Braingel]

RaptorWizard 3 minute long speech Wisdom Mastery Solitude Wizard Lord

This video right here does not seem Ne ignoring at all. He keeps going on different tangents and ways to compare it. An IEI ignores Ne... The very beginning of that is in no way Ne’s ignorance.

[Braingel]

Well he could actually be an LSI. It has HA Ni, and it kind of seems like Raptor wants showcase his Ni. And he is not totally apt with it, but wants it to spotlight.. So yeah, LSI actually does work.

He is not very good with Ni at all and just aspires for it to be good and harness it. This seems like the mobilizing function. An Ni base will have their Ni on par, whereas his is not, he just wants to show it and display it all..

[Braingel]

An Ni base will subconsciously use their Ni, whereas he is just grabbing his and throwing it for see.

[Braingel]

That would make him an Ne PolR.. His Ne as you can see from video is pretty chaotic and not well used.. LSI still has some issue with it, but the reason why I am seeing it as possibility is because Ni seems HA.

Fe suggestive seems like it fits.. He is attracted to Fe.

[Braingel]

This explains the 6th and 5th well.. He aspires to be Fe and Ni, but is not. The hidden agenda is what you most try display.. Your first and 6th are your main life priority, meaning he would want most show off Ti and Ni. He is fond of Ni people as myself and borrows our idea and sayings, because it helps his HA Ni to build..

Attachment 16979

[Braingel]

And and PolR can maybe explain with how he does not know when too much Ne is too much. He probably would be an LSI creative subtype, an Ne type, but uses it immaturely because of it being in the position of PolR.

Te ignored makes sense.