adgfajsdfjafjasfiajsfioa;ewhgaeoruighaer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_Jdk7jke0Q
adgfajsdfjafjasfiajsfioa;ewhgaeoruighaer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_Jdk7jke0Q
I think the outward signs really favour LSI over ESI. Like when you wrote about plausible alexithymia. If we take it as type dependent.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
idk about this, I mean I can read people's emotional states & body language with extreme ease. With certain people who are emotionally less aware I know what is going on internally be4 they realize themselves. Its not really required of people to say wtf is going on with them as long as their body language, voice and so on betrays them. Very few people like my father however are like a still pond where nothing disturbs the surface and everything is hidden they annoy me (damn IP thinker phlegmatics)
Even internally I don't think I'm super unaware or confused by my emotions, more like I hide them as much as possible due to inhibition and a dislike of being vulnerable / preference for privacy. Even when emotions blindside me seemingly coming from nowhere.. internally I'm aware that I was feeling nothing and all of a sudden things got really heated.
so its not like LSIs are unemotional internally or highly confused about that or the emotions of other ppl. Personally I just don't like sharing that side of me with ppl I don't trust, which are most people.
LSIs are melancholic aka IJ temperament after all (note that even EXIs are Fe ignoring):
Last edited by SGF; 04-20-2021 at 04:15 AM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I could be mixing you up with someone else, but were you the person who had a car accident and a significant change in your emotions and personality?
FWIW ESI made sense to me.
I am damn near convinced you are ESI... Your whole ambiance and experience on discord is gamma-licious... Making most LSI boiz blush.
I am making friends with a lovely LSI guy and we exchange polite salutations gazillion times over. Ha
still think she's an IEI, also leaning more towards normalising subtype (who by the way have accentuated Ti, Fi and Si, the strong functions of LSI and ESI). shame that nobody agrees.
It seems rude to ask without informing you that I couldn't take it seriously, but I'm very interested in how this typing would be deconstructed in a function breakdown and maybe you'd be incentivized by the mental toy or sth, just saying. And I can easily see myself finding things to nitpick about if ur feeling that discourse biz
I mean it's all intuitive anyway but I look at your tumblr and see all the artistic things you have on there and I just don't see a type with vulnerable intuition. you mention in your video that you're good at nitpicky stuff even though creative subtypes are really bad at that. it doesn't matter to me that you don't take it seriously but I know what I know.
I don't think ashlesha is LSI in the first place, but G's explanation for her being Ti base seems pretty weak.
From what I've seen of ashlesha's videos, what he seems to be talking about is just how E6 people are. The way she moves her eyes/expressions of doubt I see on a lot of E6 individuals of different types, though IME these are usually S types, and usually introverted S types.Logic is more than ethics
This trait is the hardest to define. At first glance, Kassie appears to be ethical. But in her
video, the logical signs of "body language" - the characteristic eye movements as well
as facial expressions of doubt and reflection - are well represented.
Controlling people has more to do with Se than Te/Ti. And I don't know how exactly how this job works, but isn't it essentially just making sure that organizations are doing what they're supposed to? Unless you think F types are stupid at just about everything that isn't customer service or childcare or prostitution, I don't see why this would be particularly difficult for an ESI.The nature of Kassie's work as a compliance analyst also requires the manifestation of
the structural logic function (+L). This is a job that involves controlling. She says it suits
her, even if it is a bit boring. In addition, we learn from the interview with Kassie that she
is quite good at categorizing information.3
Besides, anecdotally, most ESIs I've known really like to keep checklists, and my understanding of this job is that it's essentially going through a giant checklist. @ashlesha, would you say that's right?
She's anxious and Ne PoLR, thus she's not an F type. ??So why does she have strong emotions? This excitement is primarily due to her anxious
nature. States of uncertainty are very exhausting to her psyche. In order to clarify the
situation, she aggravates the course of events, does not withdraw, but rather plunges
into stress. This relieves the pressure on her weak function - the intuition of
opportunities (I).
i dont identify at all with e6 anymore. i dont identify with any enneagram type anymore and i'm not all hooked into diving into my flaws, so whatever, i won't argue. regularly score 4 on tests over the last couple years, and 7 is unquestionably more prominent.
yes, that would be more or less correct for what i talked about in the video interview to him. occasionally more interpretive analysis would be involved, but help was easy to find. interesting u zoomed in on my work, because its interesting to me that it was his primary reason for typing me Ti base, but since then, i've become very involved with a different department at work. and these days i use much more Fi. what i do involves more open-ended analysis for sure (i've wondered if Te or Ti), but its this: I've been reviewing complaints and any documents or recordings compiled in a package to show the "proofs", so to speak. and i've been looking them over with my knowledge base about relevant banking regulations to make sure things are all legit and squared away. but it requires a good amount of sniffing around that can be sensitive and it's not always spelled out who should be asked about things, etc. i have mixed feelings about this hardcore Fi use, tbhControlling people has more to do with Se than Te/Ti. And I don't know how exactly how this job works, but isn't it essentially just making sure that organizations are doing what they're supposed to? Unless you think F types are stupid at just about everything that isn't customer service or childcare or prostitution, I don't see why this would be particularly difficult for an ESI.
Besides, anecdotally, most ESIs I've known really like to keep checklists, and my understanding of this job is that it's essentially going through a giant checklist. @ashlesha, would you say that's right?
i had the same confused reaction, glad it wasn't just me.She's anxious and Ne PoLR, thus she's not an F type. ??
You value but supervise Se; pretty sure you sidestep Ti; no signs of aristocracy; and you are contradictory in a way that I associate with Gammas (that could just be Sx though).
Your tumblr is Gamma Introvert with Sx instinct first or second; subdued Se > Ni.
Yea, ESI.
You may record his video with a 10 min tale on interesting theme for him. With good seen face, etc.
To check his possible type.
> he got a little laugh
It needs a competence to understand correctly.
And "professional" in Socionics means mainly to take money. Other such "professional" will type you to a different type with high chance. Also, Gulenko uses not Socionics but a mix of it with own nonsense.
imo listening to randoms on the forum is a waste of time and only breeds confusion, especially if one is E6.
Statistically speaking if one is a LSI one has to either be E6 or E1 (rarely E8) and E6 is by far the most likely type for LSIs. E1 is more likely for ESI simply by its nature to be irritable and moralistic in a like/dislike kind of way. A lot of social sixes resemble ones, but don;t share the core motivation.
LOL IPs are emotionally not expressive idealistic perfectionists who nitpick at details and plan things in advance aka melancholic.
@ashlesha see this is the level of either trolling or plebeian lack of theoretical understanding that exists on the forum.
Last edited by SGF; 04-22-2021 at 04:13 AM.
https://translate.google.com/transla.../socioniks.net
There you go. I was deleting my post not wanting to get into a dumb argument on someone else's thread, but since you quoted it . . . here you go, a nice fat authoritative source for you in the link above that happens to agree with me that it's DCNH related.
There's a mix of traits between the IP and IJ and the melancholic and phlegmatic when you read other sources. Some make the melancholic sound more IP, and others more IJ. Most that I'm looking at currently do sound more IJ, but the moodiness is more IP. Even in the link in your sig there are overlap traits between the two. For example the phlegmatic "strongly resists change" which is rational IJ and not IP.
Sorry, I had copied from translated page. Here's direct link: https://socioniks.net/consultation/?id=262
Here you can read my entire analysis and compare it to your own:
Conclusion by the interview
Date: 9/1/2020
Respondent: Attila
Socionist: Victor DarkAngelFireWolf69 (SHS) <== lol I love how the website changes his name.
Objective: define type and subtype
Method: content analysis, body language
Required knowledge: 16 types, 8 functions, temperaments, installations, DCNH subtype system
Type as intersection of temperament and installation
In order to determine the socionic type of a person, it is necessary to assess his or her temperament and installation. 4 temperaments X 4 installations = 16 types.
Taking into account that people change over time, it is also necessary to define the variant of a particular person's type - one of four (DCNH system).
Both the installation and the temperament are fairly well expressed in these videos that the respondent provided. Let’s start with installation.
Installation (activity orientation)
Logic is more than ethics
The respondent is good at systematization and comprehension of complex information. He approaches everything that happens from the logical point of view - he tries to find regularities and draw reasonable conclusions. When memorizing, he relies on connections between the data to build a biger picture. He is good at solving problems where there is a system, including technical ones.
Judging by his facial expressions, his smile is more like a role smile, i.e. consciously represented. Perhaps, he is learning some communication techniques on purpose. Emotions rarely capture him to such an extent that he loses self-control.
2
Sensing is more than intuition
In favor of the sensing is evidenced by his ability to watch his appearance, to look neat when he leaves the house. It is important for him to be perceived good by others. He is also quite observant, and thanks to his attention to detail, he determines what happened to a person by his/her facial expressions and body language.
His mood does not change by itself, but depends on his physical condition, for example, he is hungry or full, tired or rested. He goes in for sports not to win competitions, but for health. This is evidence in favor of introverted sensing. You can also see the micro-mimicry of disgust on his face, which is also associated with this function.
The respondent noted a great contrast between himself and the girl he met when he was 24 years old. This contrast also relates to the dependence on external evaluation. Compared to a girl who has a distracted and intuitive psyche, he looks like a sensor who monitors his current position, he needs feedback to correct his mistakes.
In extreme situations, he may also develop a power sensing. The respondent is ready to defend himself in conflicts. In states of anger, he may show aggression, for example, he may break equipment.
The logic with the sensing gives the technical and managerial installation for the activity.
Temperament
Introversion is more than extraversion
The respondent describes himself as not a very sociable person who has difficulty gaining popularity. At parties, he makes a barbecue instead of active communication. His inner world of reflections and perceptions is much richer than external activity, what is typical for introverts.
In public, he feels anxious and uncertain. It is much better when he is in the middle of a crowd and does not stand out from it. Among his hobbies, introverted activities prevail - reading, films, computer games, individual sports.
Rationality is more than irrationality
This parameter is the hardest to determine.
Let's see how the respondent's mental process is organized. The logic of the respondent precedes the sensing. Before implementing something, he will analyze and plan. This is how the psyche of rationality is organized. Irrationalists act more spontaneously and according to the situation, rather than consistently and according to some strategy.
3
Besides, the respondent notes that knowledge is not stored in his memory in an orderly manner. Since internal communication and presentation of accumulated data in a more chaotic form what corresponds to the second function rather than the first one, the assumption about rational organization of the respondent's psyche is confirmed. Logic processes and gives solutions to the outer world, quickly addressing the data accumulated by the sensing. The first function (logic) can be compared to the processor, and the second function (sensing) to memory. This is a mental circuit that is used by the logic-sensor types.
This temperament is called balanced-stable.
But if the respondent was rational, why is he messy? It is also not very clear where he got his melancholic states from. We will find the answer to this question in his subtype.
Subtype
What can we say about his subtype? - The most probable subtype in DCNH system is the fourth one, i.e. harmonizing (H).
This is evidenced, firstly, by his distantness (thoughtfulness, initial detachment, unwillingness to actively intervene in conflict situations) and, secondly, by the lesser orderliness of everyday life with a greater interest in change, rather than routine (initiality).
Distantness combined with initiality just gives a harmonizing subtype. But it becomes clear from the interview that the respondent has changed significantly over time. He develops the qualities of contactness - more emotionality and sociability, as well as ease going. If these efforts are supported, for example, by friends, family, etc., it is possible over time to move to a creative subtype.
The conclusion
So, the type of respondent is a balanced-stable temperament in the management installation - LSI (Inspector) of a harmonizing subtype. Characteristic feature of such personality: a long search for yourself, philosophical reflection on life, depression control, loyalty, a sense of lost harmony and the desire to regain it.
Why don't you guys join the discord server to see her in action?!
Because I'm not experienced enough to type someone. G has an entire decades long database to compare and contrast her to.
idk.. would have never considered myself phlegmatic because I'm very reactive and dislike relaxing. I sometimes explode and argue. I don't consider myself melancholic due to H mushiness tho.. its mainly due to perfectionism, tendency to overthink be4 acting, planning, thinking in advance, being meticulous, idealistic and willful-uncontrollable. Its kinda like being an introverted Choleric who does not like to control others.
Here is why G classified me as IJ:
(I admit I'm VERY deliberate and never do anything without thinking it through, spontaneity is not something I have. I dislike surprises or doing anything without thinking it through first.. in fact I OVERTHINK things) I am 9000% melancholic, always tested as one.
"Rationality is more than irrationality
Let's see how the respondent's mental process is organized. The logic of the respondent precedes the sensing. Before implementing something, he will analyze and plan. This is how the psyche of rationality is organized. Irrationalists act more spontaneously and according to the situation, rather than consistently and according to some strategy.
Besides, the respondent notes that knowledge is not stored in his memory in an orderly manner. Since internal communication and presentation of accumulated data in a more chaotic form what corresponds to the second function rather than the first one, the assumption about rational organization of the respondent's psyche is confirmed. Logic processes and gives solutions to the outer world, quickly addressing the data accumulated by the sensing. The first function (logic) can be compared to the processor, and the second function (sensing) to memory. This is a mental circuit that is used by the logic-sensor types.
This temperament is called balanced-stable.
But if the respondent was rational, why is he messy? It is also not very clear where he got his melancholic states from. We will find the answer to this question in his subtype."
hmm considering how deliberate I am even in MBTI I may be a J even tho I'm disorganized aka H-C. That would make sense as to why I always test ISTJ on Keirsey's test, its the same type a Social 6 is aka "the social guardian" ISTJ - Inspector.
maybe it annoys people that I trust DarkAngelFireWolf69, but its in the fucking type description that So E6, LSI and ISTJ all trust authorities they value. I basically rebell against authorities I don't trust, this segways into beta quadra's us vs them aristocratic mentality.
Last edited by SGF; 04-22-2021 at 05:47 AM.
So why don't you trust him when he says the exact same thing that I said. The thing that you thought was "trolling or plebeian theorizing" you know, that thing. =P I'm teasing ofc but it is kind of funny. Is it still trolling? heh, maybe a little now =D
Also, some of what you describe re. your cautiousness and being deliberate sounds more like distant than like rationality. Some is rationality (such as being prepared ahead of time etc) but some of what you describe just sounds like avoidance and hesitancy. ? I'm putting a question mark there because I don't want to assume too much, but that's what it sounds like. You mix concepts sometimes. For example, you keep insisting that LSIs are the quintessential 6s . . . and they really aren't. There's not as much overlap there as you think there is. You may have the qualities of an LSI and also be a 6, but they're not the same qualities. I've known just as many IEEs that are 6s as LSIs (or perhaps even more) and they're conflicting socionics types with opposite strengths/weaknesses. So you're conflating the qualities and believing them to be the same thing imo, when they're separate things. You can be both, but you don't have to be both, nor is it especially more likely.
DCNH is odd and interesting in how much it seems to bear on the type in question. It really does make seeing temperament more difficult in some cases. It's kind of funny in that, because G said that rationality/irrationality was the hardest to determine in your case, but in mine he referred to my "excessive rationality" lol and suggested I could be aware of not letting that become a problem. And these final summaries sound almost like two completely different types rather than two subtypes of the same type:
Yours: So, the type of respondent is a balanced-stable temperament in the management installation - LSI (Inspector) of a harmonizing subtype. Characteristic feature of such personality: a long search for yourself, philosophical reflection on life, depression control, loyalty, a sense of lost harmony and the desire to regain it.
vs
Mine: So, the type of respondent is a balanced-stable temperament in managerial installation - LSI of dominant subtype (Inspector demanding). Characteristic features of such a person: firmness, conviction, quick learning, confident advancement, organizational skills, the ability to put things in order, stubbornness and fastidiousness, but at the same time kindness towards the weaker.
Temperament is very overrated... often feels like a typing crutch. That being said, I think you are ESI. One of the very few tolerable ones lol. <3
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Your choice of tumblr name, Fi relationship quotes, Catholic quotes, and bible verses gives one impression.
The Bunny Rabbit Gimp Mask, autism cum, and "Give Girls Money" tags give another.
There's aggressor imagery and power quotes next to "be gentle" quotes.
It just reminds me of how Gammas are straightforward and exploit ambiguity at the same time.
i'm about to go on tumblr and lets pray now that i'm not unconsciously motivated by the fact that i'm aware that it's open for psychological examination lol
totally not mad about it! i imagine scenarios in which someone actually has a fkn reason to look at it. not only romantic ones. Ni point, if u want.
You remind me of like a grown up version of this cool ESI girl I was friends with in high school. Sorry, it’s 4 am and I smoked a couple bowls of weed. Why do I always miss 4:20!
Last edited by flames; 04-23-2021 at 09:38 AM. Reason: p.s. the tumblr is raw content, Fi-Se in my book
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Meh looks like Scamenko is typing everybody as Beta again. It's kinda like a reversed special snowflake syndrome where Betas are the new Basic Bitch Karens lol.
I don't really see Ashelsha as Beta at all... although she has Beta influencers cuz of her family just like I have Alpha ones cuz of my family. That doesn't make her Beta herself though. I think like compared to me and @squark she definitely values Te more when people use it in a way that we don't. When a LSI gets Te like that, they aren't as weak against it as an IEI but I think they are at best kind of mildly annoyed/neutral towards it. When ashelsha gets Te otoh, she seems to light up like a Christmas tree. And she definitely prefers ego-Te - demonstrative Te annoys her and she's like 'get away from me you cuck' (like when an ILE her conflictor uses Te)
Why do people take what scamenko says so seriously when he's just exploiting the thing for money to make his own self narcissistically stronger? You are all letting Oprah gaslight you lol. I know its' largely my Te polr but it kinda pisses me off- just because somebody is doing something 'professionally' doesn't mean they aren't completely full of shit, you know? Use your goddamn brain.
instead of using socionics to see things from his perspective, you are just using you own perception as a peripheral type to judge him. I've seen similar postings by other Se valuing types here, but they were mostly gamma. alpha, especially the nt types, don't give a shit about money. it's literally mentioned in every quadra description. LII have Se as vulnerable function and Te as ignoring function. they are not entrepeneurs. it probably costs him a lot of energy to take care of his team and he could just decide to not give a fuck about a western audience, but instead of being grateful that he even offers a service that maybe a dozen people here use he gets accused of being in it for the money. smh
Last edited by Still Alive; 04-23-2021 at 10:29 PM.
You're generalizing too much. LIIs may be less likely than other types to care about money, but everyone has their needs. They're not some robots which only need to rent a room, buy a computer and cheap food to live happily. Ukraine is a very poor country and people there use every opportunity to make some money, over a million of them works in Poland far away from their families so they can live normally and worry less about the future. Gulenko would have to work a couple of months to earn as much as from his typing services.
you described LII pretty well there. (immanuel kant, probably the most famous LII example, never left Königsberg in his life for example).
I mean I understand your point, but a couple of people here made it seem like he just wants to make money which I'm sure is not the case.
when you're an idealistic intuitive with Ti as base, you think a lot about what is necessary and what isn't, and in the end you arrive at the conclusion that you really only need food, shelter, and a way to attain knowledge. the rest is a bonus that is also in the end unnecessary, that you could live without. find an LII and ask him if he cares about how much money he makes. chances are very high that he will tell you he doesn't care. I can guarantee you that.
Last edited by Still Alive; 04-23-2021 at 11:54 PM.
You write about some extreme examples and make an opinion about a whole spectrum of people who have this type based on it. Also LII values Si, so they unconsciously want sophisticated comforts, "I eat to live, not live to eat" is rather an attitude of Se valuers and unbalanced LIIs who rely too much on their ego functions. It's better to treat socionics types as archetypes, some points on a grid of personality, real people are placed on the same grid chaotically between the types. It's closer to Jung's opinion that a pure type would end up in mental asylum and also closer to current knowledge in psychology. People also differ a lot because of reasons outside of socionics.