# Thread: Functions test

1. ## Functions test

What are your guys results on this? https://sakinorva.net/functions

This was my result
Screenshot_20210127-180131_Chrome.jpg

2. Originally Posted by SlytherinPower
What are your guys results on this? https://sakinorva.net/functions

This was my result
Screenshot_20210127-180131_Chrome.jpg
screenshot_20210127_220228.jpg

3. functest.PNG
So somehow because I enjoy eating yummy food that means I have high Se lol. And despite that it says there's no doubt I'm an N type. Something is wrong with the math in this test. The z-scores for the MBTI preference (E vs I, N vs S, etc.) aren't exclusive to each other, so you could score lower than average on both I and E functions (negative z-score) and be a nothingvert (not extravert and not intravert), or you could score above average on both I and E functions (positive z-scores) and be an everyvert (both extraverted and intraverted)

4. The test repeats the same mbti misunderstandings as usual. Its worthless

5. MBTI texts are accented on dichotomies and so their undestanding of functions can be worse. It can be lesser correct and detailed than in Socionics. If they don't notice wrong (and contradicting to Jung) functional model for introverted types, then they may have bad understanding of functions.

In the example given in 1st message is seen equal sum for T and F, what means test did not worked good for T/F dichotomy. Too much difference between close developed Si and Se may point on mistakes of understanding of those functions.

Originally Posted by The Banana King
you could score lower than average on both I and E functions (negative z-score) and be a nothingvert
Jung type is what more expressed _in you_, what dominates in your consciousness. It's secondary about social average levels.
Hypothetically, with higher IQ you should get higher sum of opposite functions as have better mind abbilities in general, including in your weak regions.

6. ## Functions test

MBTI conflate cognitive preference with personal/behavioral preference. It said I’d likely be ISTJ as my MBTI type but from MBTI functions it’s ISXP aka Ti/Fi Se. The descriptions of MBTI ISTJ is most similar to LSI and I’m not either. I do have strong Ti and Fi development.

7. this test is garbage

8. It’s possible the test gives insight into what your subtype would be. Banana King got Se and Ne highest irrational functions so C subtype. I know you claim H sub, Banana but C is where H wants to be or you could actually be C sub. I got Fi and Ti highest judgment functions and I’m normalizing subtype. MBTI definitions don’t translate over to socionics, nor does it have adherence to Jung but it could accidentally reveal a pattern, as I’ve suggested.

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•