Wrong, where does our moral core come from? It's internalized from society. In ordinary people, this happens at such an early age that it becomes an instinct. Ultimately, it's programmed in - the moral core doesn't just pop out of the ground on its own unless something else actively instantiates it there.
Social conditioning - that's forced upon people. So even "moral" people only grew up that way because they were forced into that mentality.
Outside of this, I conjecture, the main glue that keeps societies running like clocks is mutual deterrence - everyone fearing force from everyone else if they slip up.
In both cases, it's force, either soft-force or the implicit threat of hard-force, that gives all morality its backing. Frankly I don't find the line of "sociopath" very valid if a sociopath has no qualms against using violence, if the very precondition of social existence itself is also violence.
~~~
“Should God take up the cause of truth if he were not himself truth?” He cares only for his cause, but, because he is all in all, therefore all is his cause! But we, we are not all in all, and our cause is altogether little and contemptible; therefore we must “serve a higher cause.” – Now it is clear, God cares only for what is his, busies himself only with himself, thinks only of himself, and has only himself before his eyes; woe to all that is not well pleasing to him. He serves no higher person, and satisfies only himself. His cause is – a purely egoistic cause.
~~~
Men got a cock, women typically don't.Then maybe you should tell, why the vast majority of women do not rape. Maybe here is one reason: perhaps it's about not objectifying the other person.
You don't have a body and a mind, you are a body! So you couldn't change male behavior unless in the process you eliminated what made them male.
So to even address the very question of why men do some things and women do others is enough to invalidate the inquiry at the very outset. It's a useless question.



Reply With Quote