G typed me LSI.
reading through her descriptions of functions noted the following:
Fi - not sure, prefer harmonious relationships over drama tho. Mercy and empathy is not me tho. I can read ppl's intentions and motivation with ease.
Fe - my worst function, I'm terrible at this, but I like ppl who have positive Fe. This function for me is trash and I always wish I was good at this / need someone who is good at this.help..
Ti - mostly me, minus the rules & regulation part. I don't give a rat's ass about rules, regulation, bureaucracy.
Te - boring, but I can do it just fine. This type of information is evident to me and when supplied by someone else it bores and annoys me.
Si - mostly me minus enjoying to relax and those boring hobbies, I need stimulation. Relaxing is boring and depressing.
Se - a necessity at times for self defense, otherwise I dislike ppl who are like this / find them abrasive and don't value it much. I have more ideological zeal and passion than drive for impact and material wealth.
Ni - describes me down to a T :/ fucking weird, it reads like it would be my main function. I can't stop doing this tbh.. its just there all the time. Also weirdly gr8 at time management, never being late, always intuitively know whats about to happen, who to trust, where the course of events is headed and how much time it takes me to do stuff, so I don't need to plan lol. Its rather instinctual.
Ne - I'm not good at this tbh, insight sure, but I doubt and have a hard time choosing options, prefer Ni. Brainstorming is nice.
in terms of vulnerable function both Feeling and Intuition rings true. Never had a problem with sensing or thinking related. I could be overestimating my Ni to be honest, but I always feel confident in it's use and enjoy every aspect of it. Its either Fe or Ne PolR. ..e_e considering I'm enneagram 6.. Ne PolR makes the most sense... but my Fe is weak and needs help FML.
Typical result I get on most socionics tests is ILI:
Re-calibrating for overestimation of Ni capabilities yields SLI or LSI:
![]()



reading through her descriptions of functions noted the following:
Reply With Quote