Page 25 of 32 FirstFirst ... 15212223242526272829 ... LastLast
Results 961 to 1,000 of 1262

Thread: Gulenko's typings of forum members AKA Big G SquaD

  1. #961

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ti just looks for a general direction that it can work with, while Te strives for objective knowledge. for example, Ti might observe the pattern that ethical men and logical women are more likely to be homosexual. just patterns and the generalalisations. Te on the other hand might disregard this claim unless there have been studies done and data has been collected. same with socionics, which is a field that is dominated by Ti valuing types, while the scientific community is mostly dominated by Te valuing types. they disregard speculative theories, and Ti doesn't care to objectively prove it.

  2. #962
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTp 7w8 Aries Sp/Sx
    Posts
    4,136
    Mentioned
    236 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I've had many discussions with him in chat and I'm quite convinced he is an EII. we are quite similar in many ways. the major difference between us is him focusing more on data and statistics.
    what Fi lead focuses on data and statistics idiot? this fucking ''Subteigh = EII'' myth needs to fucking die.
    ~ ESTP ~ SLE ~ 7w8 ~ Sp/Sx ~ Fire ~ Aries ~ Beta ~ Gryffindor ~ Summer ~ SLUEN ~

  3. #963
    Enlightened Hedonist Subteigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    17,426
    Mentioned
    366 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    I said anchors not assumptions
    How does that differ from assumptions, in your definition?

    I said "Things can be internally consistent and still be absolutely wrong.", and you said I only need a few anchors, as though I only need to hold a few things to be self-evident.

  4. #964

  5. #965
    Enlightened Hedonist Subteigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    17,426
    Mentioned
    366 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    Ti just looks for a general direction that it can work with, while Te strives for objective knowledge. for example, Ti might observe the pattern that ethical men and logical women are more likely to be homosexual. just patterns and the generalalisations. Te on the other hand might disregard this claim unless there have been studies done and data has been collected. same with socionics, which is a field that is dominated by Ti valuing types, while the scientific community is mostly dominated by Te valuing types. they disregard speculative theories, and Ti doesn't care to objectively prove it.
    I can only really say I'm an INXX type at the moment, and that for me, I find typologies like Socionics as only being able to tell me what I already know about myself.

  6. #966

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    what Fi lead focuses on data and statistics idiot? this fucking ''Subteigh = EII'' myth needs to fucking die.
    you're really irritating. you can't comprehend what other people are talking about, yet you constantly insult them.

  7. #967
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTp 7w8 Aries Sp/Sx
    Posts
    4,136
    Mentioned
    236 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    you're really irritating. you can't comprehend what other people are talking about, yet you constantly insult them.
    youre fucking stupid. give me back ur LII badge
    ~ ESTP ~ SLE ~ 7w8 ~ Sp/Sx ~ Fire ~ Aries ~ Beta ~ Gryffindor ~ Summer ~ SLUEN ~

  8. #968
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTp 7w8 Aries Sp/Sx
    Posts
    4,136
    Mentioned
    236 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    clearly didnt think about this shit
    ~ ESTP ~ SLE ~ 7w8 ~ Sp/Sx ~ Fire ~ Aries ~ Beta ~ Gryffindor ~ Summer ~ SLUEN ~

  9. #969
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTp 7w8 Aries Sp/Sx
    Posts
    4,136
    Mentioned
    236 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    I can only really say I'm an INXX type at the moment, and that for me, I find typologies like Socionics as only being able to tell me what I already know about myself.
    not IN, you clearly come up with little facts and statements that ignore the broader whole, like zooming in on verses from the quran, ignoring the broader side of history.
    ~ ESTP ~ SLE ~ 7w8 ~ Sp/Sx ~ Fire ~ Aries ~ Beta ~ Gryffindor ~ Summer ~ SLUEN ~

  10. #970

  11. #971
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTp 7w8 Aries Sp/Sx
    Posts
    4,136
    Mentioned
    236 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    Something is true or it isn't.
    HUAHEUHAUHEU
    ~ ESTP ~ SLE ~ 7w8 ~ Sp/Sx ~ Fire ~ Aries ~ Beta ~ Gryffindor ~ Summer ~ SLUEN ~

  12. #972

  13. #973
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTp 7w8 Aries Sp/Sx
    Posts
    4,136
    Mentioned
    236 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    Yes, probably.
    as long as you think you smart thats important
    ~ ESTP ~ SLE ~ 7w8 ~ Sp/Sx ~ Fire ~ Aries ~ Beta ~ Gryffindor ~ Summer ~ SLUEN ~

  14. #974

  15. #975
    💩 Nobody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    TIM
    POOP™
    Posts
    441
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    you're really irritating. you can't comprehend what other people are talking about, yet you constantly insult them.
    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    youre fucking stupid. give me back ur LII badge
    But you can have mine. I made it out of chocolate.

    So you're ALIIve again.
    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    Just rename this place Beta Central lmao
    Quote Originally Posted by MidnightWilderness View Post
    The only problem socionics has given me is a propensity to analyze every relationship from the lens of socionics and I also see that it is worse in my boyfriend. Nothing makes any sense that way and it does not really solve any problems.





  16. #976
    Looking into his gorgeous blue eyes... SlytherinPower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    At the gym
    TIM
    SEE-Se-C 738so
    Posts
    740
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Niki and Gabi are twins who both have separate YouTube channels & a channel together. Apparently they haven't always gotten along well, & they don't seem to have the same personality imo but what do you guys think?

    https://youtu.be/3IGmzTE4rik

  17. #977
    Looking into his gorgeous blue eyes... SlytherinPower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    At the gym
    TIM
    SEE-Se-C 738so
    Posts
    740
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  18. #978

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlytherinPower View Post
    ugh , couldn't watch more than 3 minutes. might be my conflict type. the other girl seems extroverted too, maybe ENxx but they are both so uninteresting I can't really watch them.

    edit: wow their main channel has 10 mio subs. maybe I will force myself to watch more. Gabi seems like an SEE, shouldn't take long to figure out Niki who seems a bit more interesting to me at least.

  19. #979
    Looking into his gorgeous blue eyes... SlytherinPower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    At the gym
    TIM
    SEE-Se-C 738so
    Posts
    740
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    ugh , couldn't watch more than 3 minutes. might be my conflict type. the other girl seems extroverted too, maybe ENxx but they are both so uninteresting I can't really watch them.
    Thought I'd post since people in here were talking about identical twins & as far as I know they're identical (although Gabi's gotten plastic surgery on her face). Gabi easily could strike me as being SEI tbh. She seems so into everything to do with aesthetics. Niki easily strikes me as being ENxx agreed.

  20. #980

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlytherinPower View Post
    yeah I think Gabi is an ESFp and Niki an ENFp. both are normalising subtypes. quite similar types imo. it's interesting to see the differences in how they present themselves bc of their type

    https://ibb.co/qg1D5gy (Niki)

    https://ibb.co/C8Rztxh (Gabi)
    Last edited by Alive; 02-17-2021 at 04:01 AM.

  21. #981
    Looking into his gorgeous blue eyes... SlytherinPower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    At the gym
    TIM
    SEE-Se-C 738so
    Posts
    740
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    yeah I think Gabi is an ESFp and Niki an ENFp. both are normalising subtypes. quite similar types imo. it's interesting to see the differences in how they presents themselves bc of their type

    https://ibb.co/qg1D5gy (Niki)

    https://ibb.co/C8Rztxh (Gabi)
    Yeah I follow both on Instagram & the style difference is interesting to see.

  22. #982
    Haikus SGF's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    ┌П┐(ಠ_ಠ)
    TIM
    LSI-H™
    Posts
    2,169
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlytherinPower View Post
    kekw, neither looks like they could do yard work or deal with much hardship. Gabi also seems to be overly fussy and a bottomless pit where money would vanish. What a waste.

  23. #983
    Looking into his gorgeous blue eyes... SlytherinPower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    At the gym
    TIM
    SEE-Se-C 738so
    Posts
    740
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shotgunfingers View Post
    kekw, neither looks like they could do yard work or deal with much hardship. Gabi also seems to be overly fussy and a bottomless pit where money would vanish. What a waste.
    I mean.. as long as it's her money that she's making & spending what's the difference? Lol But the point was that I don't think twins are automatically the same personality type.

  24. #984
    Haikus SGF's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    ┌П┐(ಠ_ಠ)
    TIM
    LSI-H™
    Posts
    2,169
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlytherinPower View Post
    I mean.. as long as it's her money that she's making & spending what's the difference? Lol But the point was that I don't think twins are automatically the same personality type.
    IDENTICAL twins. Not twins. There is a difference:

    Fraternal, or dizygotic, twins are 2 separate fertilized eggs, they usually develop 2 separate amniotic sacs, placentas, and supporting structures. Identical, or monozygotic, twins may or may not share the same amniotic sac, depending on how early the single fertilized egg divides into 2.

    If twins are a boy and a girl, clearly they are fraternal twins, as they do not have the same DNA. A boy has XY chromosomes and a girl has XX chromosomes. Girl-boy twins occur when one X egg is fertilized with an X sperm, and a Y sperm fertilizes the other X egg.

    Sometimes health care professionals identify same-sex twins as fraternal or identical based on ultrasound findings or by examining the membranes at the time of delivery. The best way to determine if twins are identical or fraternal is by examining each child’s DNA.. as identical twins have identical DNA and fraternal twins don't.

  25. #985
    Looking into his gorgeous blue eyes... SlytherinPower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    At the gym
    TIM
    SEE-Se-C 738so
    Posts
    740
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shotgunfingers View Post
    IDENTICAL twins. Not twins. There is a difference:

    Fraternal, or dizygotic, twins are 2 separate fertilized eggs, they usually develop 2 separate amniotic sacs, placentas, and supporting structures. Identical, or monozygotic, twins may or may not share the same amniotic sac, depending on how early the single fertilized egg divides into 2.

    If twins are a boy and a girl, clearly they are fraternal twins, as they do not have the same DNA. A boy has XY chromosomes and a girl has XX chromosomes. Girl-boy twins occur when one X egg is fertilized with an X sperm, and a Y sperm fertilizes the other X egg.

    Sometimes health care professionals identify same-sex twins as fraternal or identical based on ultrasound findings or by examining the membranes at the time of delivery. The best way to determine if twins are identical or fraternal is by examining each child’s DNA.. as they have identical DNA.
    Well I just Google searched it & Niki & Gabi are identical twins. Gabi's gotten plastic surgery on her face though. She's had her nose & eyes done. So in that case, do they seem like the same type?

    https://youtu.be/Toe1YAi--QE

  26. #986

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13,036
    Mentioned
    1199 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlytherinPower View Post
    I don't think twins are automatically the same personality type.
    What makes a type is not known.
    Definetely it's not made by Gulenko typing or by what people like to fantasy at yourself today, though some noobs seems to act so.

    Also when a trait has genetic factor this does not mean that as the only factor.

    Based on known there are no reasons to claim that identical twins can't have different Jung types.
    It's possibly to suspect genetic factor among the ones which make it, based on that identical twins mostly seem to have same or close types. Would be good to give them tests, as similarity of the look may distort VI perceptions.

    Quote Originally Posted by SlytherinPower View Post
    Well I just Google searched it & Niki & Gabi are identical twins. Gabi's gotten plastic surgery on her face though. She's had her nose & eyes done. So in that case, do they seem like the same type? youtu.be/Toe1YAi--QE
    On left has ISFP. On right mb too.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  27. #987
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aylesbury
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    1,678
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You don't know what is my method and what is Butterfly model. I recorded a video where I compare subtype theories of Gulenko and mine. You are welcome to watch it.
    I will post it on the forum.

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    I'm not sure why you're complaining so much when you literally use a Butterfly to type people (and a model which has nothing to do with Augusta's original concept of socionics).
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  28. #988
    Disrupting your illusory reality Megatrop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Your mind
    TIM
    ENFP
    Posts
    563
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olga View Post
    You don't know what is my method and what is Butterfly model. I recorded a video where I compare subtype theories of Gulenko and mine. You are welcome to watch it.
    I will post it on the forum.
    Hey I tried contacting you without success. How can I contact you to get your typing service?
    self-discovery
    self-development
    optimism
    relationships
    communication
    high ideals

  29. #989
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aylesbury
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    1,678
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hi, Megatrop
    Not sure, why you did not manage to reach me. My email is on my website olgatangemann@gmail.com I am not often here but always on FB where I have a few groups like Socionics International and a few small other groups by TPEs. Sometimes I noticed that I do not see straight away the messages from new people. I would suggest to request a friendship and say in a message that you wish to be typed. Or to write to me by email. For all who wishes to be typed I have a link on my website - Information for clients.
    http://socionics4you.com/информация-...#1074;?lang=en
    I use clients preferences in art and music as well as test results for teaching the method to others. I archive them on the forum. The clients identity is protected by the nickname.
    Pictures and videos if the client does not mind to share it I post as well. But if the client wishes to stay fully confidential then no pictures or videos appear anywhere. No information by which you can recognise the client either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Megatrop View Post
    Hey I tried contacting you without success. How can I contact you to get your typing service?
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  30. #990

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13,036
    Mentioned
    1199 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olga View Post
    I have a few groups like Socionics International
    You are using "typing" by colors. To relate this to Socionics needs be in texts of Jung or Augustinavichiute or to have an experimental proof. Without this what you do is not Socionics and to call it as Socionics is a misleading.

    An experimental proof for typing by colors as an aproach may be a match of results with normal dichotomy/8 functional test or when a type was claimed before. You should take a human and offer him to get a type by both these approaches and to see how much higher than accidental chance those results match.
    For example. I'm using mostly nonverbal VI. Augustinavichiute texts have this approach in impressions what people of different types give by nonverbal behavior. Then I've did an experiment (with the usage of random people on a forum) which shaw that they match by nonverbal VI method with higher chance than accidentally (~17%) what means such info is useful for a typing.

    Gulenko is in similar situation. He uses significantly what is not Socionics and what is baseless fantasies. Besides incorrect usage of "Socionics" for the name of his practice, those doubtful hypotheses are much possibly wrong, what predisposes him to higher number of mistakes and to farther types from correct ones. By usage of strange methods you also should do more mistakes than could by normal methods.
    Also you have a problem which I've noticed as not a single case among practicing typology - incorrect understanding of own type, which is not ESI as you think (but seems EIE). With such mistake you may do more typing mistakes when compare people with yourself in common behavior and should not understand correctly IR theory.

    If you have an interest to use Socionics - you'd better used normal hypotheses of Socionics. Any principle additions need an experimental proof to trust them. Such would be more use for people and mb for you too.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  31. #991
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,264
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    You are using "typing" by colors. To relate this to Socionics needs be in texts of Jung or Augustinavichiute or to have an experimental proof. Without this what you do is not Socionics and to call it as Socionics is a misleading.

    An experimental proof for typing by colors as an aproach may be a match of results with normal dichotomy/8 functional test or when a type was claimed before. You should take a human and offer him to get a type by both these approaches and to see how much higher than accidental chance those results match.
    For example. I'm using mostly nonverbal VI. Augustinavichiute texts have this approach in impressions what people of different types give by nonverbal behavior. Then I've did an experiment (with the usage of random people on a forum) which shaw that they match by nonverbal VI method with higher chance than accidentally (~17%) what means such info is useful for a typing.

    Gulenko is in similar situation. He uses significantly what is not Socionics and what is baseless fantasies. Besides incorrect usage of "Socionics" for the name of his practice, those doubtful hypotheses are much possibly wrong, what predisposes him to higher number of mistakes and to farther types from correct ones. By usage of strange methods you also should do more mistakes than could by normal methods.
    Also you have a problem which I've noticed as not a single case among practicing typology - incorrect understanding of own type, which is not ESI as you think (but seems EIE). With such mistake you may do more typing mistakes when compare people with yourself in common behavior and should not understand correctly IR theory.

    If you have an interest to use Socionics - you'd better used normal hypotheses of Socionics. Any principle additions need an experimental proof to trust them. Such would be more use for people and mb for you too.
    Experimental proof doesn't exist for the basis of jungian typology, let alone Socionics.

  32. #992
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aylesbury
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    1,678
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sol, you clearly did not read my book. I would say you talk nonsense and I do not even wish to go deep into it because the understanding is out of reach.
    I use different instruments to get an objective picture of the type. My approach is flexible (usage of different instruments is convenient depending on circumstances) and holistic.
    I recommend to other socionists not to change the basic theory but look and study different preferences (art, music etc) which can expand our abilities to read the type by preferences. this is the way to progress.
    Study of the brain maybe useful too but the type has 2 components - physical and psychological content. We cannot replace one for another. My approach to study the type is psychophysiological, similar to temperaments but a higher level of differentiation because I analyse subconscious preferences. I combine qualitative and quantitative approach like tests and psychoanalysis. I hope to publish the book in English this year and open the online course. The necessary condition for the acceptance to the course will be type identification.
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  33. #993
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,051
    Mentioned
    299 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    updated
    @The Exception EIE

    @shotgunfingers LSI-H
    @Ebony IEI-C
    @Suspiria EIE-C
    @Chakram LSI-N
    @Paranoia Agent ILI-C
    @thegreenfaerie LSI-H
    @Uncle Ave LSI-C
    @aster IEI-N
    @justalitnerdxx IEI-H
    @Kiana SEE-N
    @aster's friend SLE
    @Northstar SLE-C
    @Varlawend ILI
    @uniden ILI
    @Desert Financial ILI
    @Viktor SLE-H
    @shotgun's friend EIE
    @megedy IEI-C
    @Sachmet LII
    @ouronis ILE N-H
    @Peteronfire LSI

    guys from yt channel:

    Kristin LSI
    Nathan ILI
    Kurtis SEE
    Drew LSI
    Shane SLE
    Eskil SLE

    19 betas out of 28...

    sorry if i omitted or repeated someone

  34. #994
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,771
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    19 betas out of 28...
    I think he mistyped The Exception. Imo delta NF rather than beta. I don't know everyone on the list, but I'm sure there are other mistypings because nobody gets everything right. Even when they know socionics as well as Gulenko. Because even something as simple as a translation error can drastically change someone's interpretation. He probably did get a majority right, but there will always be mistypings.

    There are a few different reasons that it might skew towards beta even if every typing was right (which is near impossible) - betas might be more inclined to seek out his typing services, or there might be more betas on this forum. And then translation issues might be making people come across differently, watching other people's videos and being influenced by their answers and probably other stuff I didn't consider could lead to typing problems.

    I need to look at what criteria he's using for rationality/irrationality though, because DCNH messes with how that comes across and I want to see how he's separating the two. Actually, I'm kind of curious how he'd type me, and I should probably try to forget about socionics as much as possible if I want a more accurate opinion that isn't colored by my own bias quite as much if I decide to do it.

  35. #995
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,051
    Mentioned
    299 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    I think he mistyped The Exception. Imo delta NF rather than beta. I don't know everyone on the list, but I'm sure there are other mistypings because nobody gets everything right. Even when they know socionics as well as Gulenko. Because even something as simple as a translation error can drastically change someone's interpretation. He probably did get a majority right, but there will always be mistypings.

    There are a few different reasons that it might skew towards beta even if every typing was right (which is near impossible) - betas might be more inclined to seek out his typing services, or there might be more betas on this forum. And then translation issues might be making people come across differently, watching other people's videos and being influenced by their answers and probably other stuff I didn't consider could lead to typing problems.

    I need to look at what criteria he's using for rationality/irrationality though, because DCNH messes with how that comes across and I want to see how he's separating the two. ctually, I'm kind of curious how he'd type me, and I should probably try to forget about socionics as much as possible if I want a more accurate opinion that isn't colored by my own bias quite as much if I decide to do it.
    totally. i think it's fair to consider 5-6 mistypings in this list, due to a probability of success of 80% circa (which would be a very good one all things -translations, cultures, bias, chance- considered).

    i think that at this point it's quite obvious that he can't really distinguish Delta, it was already apparent by his site, he listed fewer Deltas than any other quadras, but that's very strange for someone with his experience and with his age, can't he really think of any more famous Deltas than the 4-5 examples he displayed per type? and why are all the other quadras instead displaying a dozen examples per type? it's just suspicious.

    unfortunately this seemingly little bias has the potential to skew all the other "correct typings".

    now, it's really noteworthy that out of 28 or so people there are no deltas at all, considering some of them are considered among the most frequent types in the population by socionics statistics (LSE and INFJ in particular)...

    just pondering~

  36. #996
    scientist donkey BrightDemonSheep96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On a toilet, right above you
    TIM
    ILE-H LEVF/omnibeta
    Posts
    6,562
    Mentioned
    278 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gulenko seems to think that deltas rarely get famous. So that. It is like it determines it.

    Among deltas only few alphas and ESI's should be expected to be on display.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

  37. #997
    mfckrz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/sp
    Posts
    378
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    19 betas out of 28...
    Betas getting overtyped in Gulenkonics too?

  38. #998
    Uncle Ave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,931
    Mentioned
    167 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    updated
    @The Exception EIE

    @shotgunfingers LSI-H
    @Ebony IEI-C
    @Suspiria EIE-C
    @Chakram LSI-N
    @Paranoia Agent ILI-C
    @thegreenfaerie LSI-H
    @Uncle Ave LSI-C
    @aster IEI-N
    @justalitnerdxx IEI-H
    @Kiana SEE-N
    @aster's friend SLE
    @Northstar SLE-C
    @Varlawend ILI
    @uniden ILI
    @Desert Financial ILI
    @Viktor SLE-H
    @shotgun's friend EIE
    @megedy IEI-C
    @Sachmet LII
    @ouronis ILE N-H
    @Peteronfire LSI

    guys from yt channel:

    Kristin LSI
    Nathan ILI
    Kurtis SEE
    Drew LSI
    Shane SLE
    Eskil SLE

    19 betas out of 28...

    sorry if i omitted or repeated someone
    I don't think it's fair to count Aster's friend and Shotgun's friend since they weren't officially typed, but while we're at it, he typed my "friend" as IEE.
    What good is a book that does not even transport us beyond all books?

    ~Nietzsche

  39. #999
    ÉL QUE SABE, SABE DEAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Pluto
    TIM
    SLE-Se
    Posts
    466
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    totally. i think it's fair to consider 5-6 mistypings in this list, due to a probability of success of 80% circa (which would be a very good one all things -translations, cultures, bias, chance- considered).

    i think that at this point it's quite obvious that he can't really distinguish Delta, it was already apparent by his site, he listed fewer Deltas than any other quadras, but that's very strange for someone with his experience and with his age, can't he really think of any more famous Deltas than the 4-5 examples he displayed per type? and why are all the other quadras instead displaying a dozen examples per type? it's just suspicious.

    unfortunately this seemingly little bias has the potential to skew all the other "correct typings".

    now, it's really noteworthy that out of 28 or so people there are no deltas at all, considering some of them are considered among the most frequent types in the population by socionics statistics (LSE and INFJ in particular)...

    just pondering~
    That's another good reason why I don't want to spend money on Gulenko. If you're spending that much money on a service like that, I'd genuinely expect the success ratio to be 98% or higher. What's the point in even spending all that money on a "learning experience" like that when you're also paying for the bias? There are much cheaper ways to get it. And whatever formula Gulenko is using to type people, it musn't be that effective if it keeps getting lost in translation and he can't distinguish people from Delta well. Most people are just paying for the brand and bragging rights at this point: "I got typed by Big Daddy G, therefore I'm superior than you, cheap cretin!" I also think that there's a sort of "placebo" effect going on there too. It's like "I paid good money for this typing, therefore Gulenko IS RIGHT and I AM X type". But Gulenko is just one man, and one opinion. You need to do the research for yourself and have an idea and think for yourself, not just take everyone's opinion as the truth.

  40. #1000
    haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    320
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maybe someone should ask the typing percentage of each type (for those he has already typed - overall). If he’s willing to reveal it.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •