Page 15 of 32 FirstFirst ... 511121314151617181925 ... LastLast
Results 561 to 600 of 1278

Thread: Gulenko's typings of forum members AKA Big G SquaD

  1. #561
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dead account View Post
    this is precisely the reason why normalising subtypes who already know about socionics have such difficulties getting into gulenko's school, and why I have such a difficult time with them. the rules I have in my head are easily changeable. I have an easier time creating new systems, because accentuated Ne of my subtype helps me. I switch to new systems on a whim, that's why creative subtypes come up with new ideas. they simply branch out in 20 directions and the more directions you take, the more likely it is that you will discover something new. normalising subtypes, having accentuated Ti, stick to specific rules no matter what. if you find a normalising LII or especially LSI, you will notice that it's almost impossible to convince them of something new if they already made up their mind about something. (base Ti + accentuated Ti because of subtype).
    I already know that. In general, LSI cannot be convinced of anything that they didn’t already agree with but the normalizing LSIs are ultra hardcore. My dad is LSI-N, and he spent more time cracking the whip on me than my D subtype mom. The difference with irrational N vs rational N subs is that irrationals are more flexible. I’m more accommodating of additional information IF it enhances greater understanding to the material and gives me more information I can utilize. I have issues with C subs because they’re weirdos and want to be oh-so-avant-garde but it amplifies the flightiness quality.

  2. #562
    scientist donkey BrightDemonSheep96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On a toilet, right above you
    TIM
    ILE-H LEVF/omnibeta
    Posts
    6,454
    Mentioned
    272 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dead account View Post
    I think this guy is a good example:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5_ogU4Jzt4

    you only need to watch a few moments of the video and you already know the type and subtype. compare him to jack from WSS, who is a normalising ILE. he's much more lethargic. the energy difference is clearly visible
    H is the absent minded professor and D is the project leader. N is supposed to be some sort of participator in various formal groups.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

  3. #563

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Comatose Lamiac 007 View Post
    H is the absent minded professor and D is the project leader. N is supposed to be some sort of participator in various formal groups.

    I've met three ILE with dominant subtypes so far and two are lawyers for big corporations, and the other one is a project manager at zalando. one of my best friends is a harmonizing ILE and he works as a translator but is unemployed most of the time depsite having a tested IQ of around 140. prefers to live a frugal life with his IEI gf.

  4. #564
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dead account View Post
    I think this guy is a good example:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5_ogU4Jzt4

    you only need to watch a few moments of the video and you already know the type and subtype. compare him to jack from WSS, who is a normalising ILE. he's much more lethargic. the energy difference is clearly visible
    Jack is normalizing EIE and Dr.G typed him as such. Jack loves Ti and talks about it quite often in his videos analyzing functions. He’s obsessed with Ti but doesn’t embody it, rather he tries extra hard to be prove how Ti he is. He does however have Ti very developed coupled with 4D demo Ne that is easily mistaken for base. Jack mainly types people based on social persona which reflects their DCNH. Being that Model A is what he rigidly sticks with, that’s how his typings gets thrown off. That’s why he typed me as SLE because he saw my developed Ti and my seething hatred and aggressive attitude against Fe was explained to me that it’s harder for women to exhibit Fe. Convenient and a very socially neat Fe way of “explaining” it, since he values Fe and that’s his true lead function.

  5. #565

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiana View Post
    Jack is normalizing EIE and Dr.G typed him as such. Jack loves Ti and talks about it quite often in his videos analyzing functions. He’s obsessed with Ti but doesn’t embody it, rather he tries extra hard to be prove how Ti he is. He does however have Ti very developed coupled with 4D demo Ne that is easily mistaken for base. Jack mainly types people based on social persona which reflects their DCNH. Being that Model A is what he rigidly sticks with, that’s how his typings gets thrown off. That’s why he typed me as SLE because he saw my developed Ti and my seething hatred and aggressive attitude against Fe was explained that to me that it’s harder for women to exhibit Fe. Convenient and a very socially neat Fe way of explaining it, since he values Fe and that’s his true lead function.
    hmm I remember having a conversation about Jack with Gulenko and I mentioned his type and subtype to him I think. I wrote him that I don't get along with Jack because he's probably a normalising subtype and Gulenko agreed with me. has been a while, though.

  6. #566

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    maybe another important thing to mention: subtypes have a huge influence on ITR, to the point that they can soften really bad relationships like supervision. if the supervisor is a normalising subtype and the supervisee a dominant subtype, then the relationship might still be quite comfortable, because the normalising subtype won't be able to pressure the dominant subtype all that much, but if it's the other way around, the relationship might become unbearable (imagine a dominant SLE putting pressure on a normalsing LII for example). gulenko thinks that subtypes aer more important for a relationship success then ITR. I wouldn't go that far, though. I agree with him that the development and focus on Fi is important for harmonious relationships, though. that's why N and H subs have a higher chance of a lifelong relationship.

  7. #567
    ˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚ aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI-N™
    Posts
    1,793
    Mentioned
    404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justalitnerdxx View Post
    When you book the consult you are provided with about 10 questions or so to answer. Then they send you another additional questions to answer (I think these vary based on what you answered in the first set). And then you are given your results. It was about 4 days for me from starting the process to being provided with my results. My first video was about 13 minutes and the second about 20. Hope this helps!
    this is a little different than what they seem to be doing now (at least for me, and it seems others?). I wonder if they recently changed it up a bit.
    𝓽𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓻
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  8. #568
    lkdhf qkb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Inferno 13th floor
    TIM
    IEE-Ne1w9/6w5/4 SX
    Posts
    643
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Comatose Lamiac 007 View Post
    H is the absent minded professor and D is the project leader. N is supposed to be some sort of participator in various formal groups.
    When you thought you have understood DCNH and then Gulenko comes and fucks you in the brain with 'complex subtypes'. LOL

    Complex subtypes are subtypes that include two components in the DCNH system. For example, consider Dominant-normalizing behavior. A person with a DN subtype is so complex that his behavior is contradictory. In some situations, he behaves dominantly, insists, exerts pressure, wants to be right, and in other situations he wants to play by the rules, rely on what has already been proven, justified or as accepted. How can this be distinguished from each other, and can it be transformed into one another? There are two main criteria for distinguishing which component is first and which is second.The first criterion is the criterion of space or communication distance. The rule works like this - the first component works at a long communicative distance, and the second component works at a close communicative distance. In the variant of Dominant-normalizing behavior, domination works on society, at a formal distance, at work, where there are no close relationships. And the normalizing component is turned on when moving to a close distance, that is, a person changes in the direction of normalization, he does not want to prove his point of view, but wants to do as agreed, according to norms, rules, and the like. Just don't think that dominance and rationing (in this example, the first and second components of a complex subtype) depend directly on the place where the person is. These components are triggered depending on the distance. Close relationships can develop in the workplace, then there will be rationing. Elements of cooling may appear on the territory of your own home, with your family and friends, you can move away, increase the distance, go with loved ones to a long communicative distance. Then the behavior will vary. In reality, of course, everything is complicated, and there is this dynamic, but it is determined by the communicative distance, and not just the location in the physical sense of the word.


    But there is also a second criterion - the criterion of time, development, where you are developing. It is known that a person changes, he can soften his character more or harden it. It depends both on the environment in which the person has got, and on the tasks that are currently facing him. If a person, for example, has to take a punch, then he develops from rationing to dominance, for example. In this sense, the criterion of time influences - the person is normalizing, but he develops in the direction of dominance. We consider this criterion from the point of view of personality development. We take the first criterion as the main criterion - distance. When we conduct a consultation, we naturally take into account the development criterion. We tell a person in which direction he is changing or can change. It depends on the person and on the requirements of the environment, on the tasks facing him.
    Taken from here.
    I rarely feel alone. I rarely talk to anyone, yet in my head i have the most amazing, the most fantastic discussions with the people in my life. In real life, what most people talk about is several orders of magnitude lesser than their inner experiences. Most people never reveal the singularity of their subjective experience.
    Maybe I should learn to explore other people's consciousness. Maybe I should aim for a real space between me and others. Instead of cultivating monologues and fantasies. It's hard, but the alternative to this seems to be madness. ~ lkdhf qkb

    Life is soup. I'm fork


  9. #569

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lkdhf qkb View Post
    When you thought you have understood DCNH and then Gulenko comes and fucks you in the brain with 'complex subtypes'. LOL
    haha I thought about sharing his two subtype theory here that he uses nowadays but I worried that it might just lead to N-subs completely giving up on DCNH.

  10. #570
    justalitnerdxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    TIM
    Type FML
    Posts
    320
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    this is a little different than what they seem to be doing now (at least for me, and it seems others?). I wonder if they recently changed it up a bit.
    oh right, what was your process like? I went through it at the end of August 2020. Although maybe they have refined it now? I only got one subtype whereas some others seem to have been given two

  11. #571
    scientist donkey BrightDemonSheep96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On a toilet, right above you
    TIM
    ILE-H LEVF/omnibeta
    Posts
    6,454
    Mentioned
    272 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lkdhf qkb View Post
    When you thought you have understood DCNH and then Gulenko comes and fucks you in the brain with 'complex subtypes'. LOL



    Taken from here.
    LOL JOA is such a DN. This approach makes it much easier for me. Don't ask me why. MB because there are clear terminals or clear initials or a mix. I really start to roll my eyes when it comes to organized meetings and stuff so I can not really see how I'd ever be normalizing.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

  12. #572
    Rusal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    TIM
    EIE-H (alt SLE-H)
    Posts
    482
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Wait until he throws the cognition styles into this. “Creatives and dominants are corrected double by normalizers of dialectical extraction” “DN holograhpicals are corrected by a factor of 3”. Charts, plus and minus signs eveywhere. What a hot mess.
    Sicuramente cercherai il significato di questo.

  13. #573

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm not sure what to think of the complex subtypes theory yet. the problem really is that a lot of the research that's done in his institute is inaccessible to us because of the language barrier. I discussed the theory with his team a bit but my focus is somewhere else atm. I find DCNH helpful enough.

  14. #574
    ˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚ aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI-N™
    Posts
    1,793
    Mentioned
    404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justalitnerdxx View Post
    oh right, what was your process like? I went through it at the end of August 2020. Although maybe they have refined it now? I only got one subtype whereas some others seem to have been given two
    I replied to thehotelambush a page back, but I’ll quote it here so you don’t have to go looking for it :
    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    Well, on their website they ask 5 questions and ask the video to be 5-7min in length. Mine ended up being a little over 7. I thought 5 was rushing it, so I was aiming for 7. Then they send you a set of personalized questions relating to your last video. They personally asked me 10 questions. I saw on the website they ask for the second video to be 5-7min in length, but I saw on this thread that others had made their second video longer, and in the email they sent me, they didn’t specify. Didn’t think I could fit 10 questions into 7min all that easy, so I just made it as long as I needed to.
    my second video ended up being I think about 20 min. long.

    so, it seems in the first video they are gauging you to narrow it down to a few possibilities (because it even says on their site in your first video you might look like two different types) and the second video is questions to narrow it down further...and, well, I’m not an expert by an means, but I have basic socionics knowledge, and I felt in the second video I had an idea what they figured my type was (by the first video), and in the second they were trying to narrow down my DCNH. after I watched my second video, I already figured what they’d type me as, and I guessed right.

    so I’m sure the length varies, but they ask for 10- 14 minutes, in total. considering the second questions are personalized, and prob can not always easily fit into that time frame (of 5-7min), I suspect most are longer.
    they only gave me one subtype, too. I think some people might fit into one, and some two. Not sure. I ordered gulenkos book, so hopefully after I read it I’ll understand all this a bit better.

    it took me a few weeks to get typed, but I suspect he was prob backed up and busy at the time. it was late November/early December, so about 3-4? months after you
    𝓽𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓻
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  15. #575

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    I replied to thehotelambush a page back, but I’ll quote it here so you don’t have to go looking for it :


    they only gave me one subtype, too. I think some people might fit into one, and some two. Not sure. I ordered gulenkos book, so hopefully after I read it I’ll understand all this a bit better.
    he doesn't mention it in his book. I don't think that many people in the west know about his 2 subtype theory, and considering that he's a C-sub, he might change his opinion about it in the future

  16. #576
    thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,271
    Mentioned
    299 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    Well, on their website they ask 5 questions and ask the video to be 5-7min in length. Mine ended up being a little over 7. I thought 5 was rushing it, so I was aiming for 7. Then they send you a set of personalized questions relating to your last video. They personally asked me 10 questions. I saw on the website they ask for the second video to be 5-7min in length, but I saw on this thread that others had made their second video longer, and in the email they sent me, they didn’t specify. Didn’t think I could fit 10 questions into 7min all that easy, so I just made it as long as I needed to.
    my second video ended up being I think about 20 min. long.

    so, it seems in the first video they are gauging you to narrow it down to a few possibilities (because it even says on their site in your first video you might look like two different types) and the second video is questions to narrow it down further...and, well, I’m not an expert by an means, but I have basic socionics knowledge, and I felt in the second video I had an idea what they figured my type was (by the first video), and in the second they were trying to narrow down my DCNH. after I watched my second video, I already figured what they’d type me as, and I guessed right.

    so I’m sure the length varies, but they ask for 10- 14 minutes, in total. considering the second questions are personalized, and prob can not always easily fit into that time frame (of 5-7min), I suspect most are longer.
    Quote Originally Posted by justalitnerdxx View Post
    When you book the consult you are provided with about 10 questions or so to answer. Then they send you another additional questions to answer (I think these vary based on what you answered in the first set). And then you are given your results. It was about 4 days for me from starting the process to being provided with my results. My first video was about 13 minutes and the second about 20. Hope this helps!
    Thank you. That's really not enough time to get a solid typing. Best case scenario 30 minutes might be enough, but not in more difficult cases. Definitely not worth the money, in my opinion.

  17. #577
    scientist donkey BrightDemonSheep96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On a toilet, right above you
    TIM
    ILE-H LEVF/omnibeta
    Posts
    6,454
    Mentioned
    272 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    I replied to thehotelambush a page back, but I’ll quote it here so you don’t have to go looking for it :


    they only gave me one subtype, too. I think some people might fit into one, and some two. Not sure. I ordered gulenkos book, so hopefully after I read it I’ll understand all this a bit better.

    it took me a few weeks to get typed, but I suspect he was prob backed up and busy at the time. it was late November/early December, so about 3-4? months after you
    There is nothing about that. It is just like there are creative subtypes that flip to normalizing etc (they want to experience a lot but might want stability). Then there are for instance harmonizing subtypes that can flip to creative (or vice versa - extremely visible eccentrics).
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

  18. #578
    ˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚ aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI-N™
    Posts
    1,793
    Mentioned
    404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Comatose Lamiac 007 View Post
    There is nothing about that. It is just like there are creative subtypes that flip to normalizing etc (they want to experience a lot but might want stability). Then there are for instance harmonizing subtypes that can flip to creative (or vice versa - extremely visible eccentrics).
    oh, ok. This is the two subtype theory that you guys were talking about. Well how did you find out, @Comatose Lamiac 007. This seems like classified information. Have you been sneaking around Ukraine?
    𝓽𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓻
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  19. #579
    scientist donkey BrightDemonSheep96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On a toilet, right above you
    TIM
    ILE-H LEVF/omnibeta
    Posts
    6,454
    Mentioned
    272 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    oh, ok. This is the two subtype theory that you guys were talking about. Well how did you find out, @Comatose Lamiac 007. This seems like classified information. Have you been sneaking around Ukraine?
    Well, I have seen that Gulenko has typed a person being in transition phase from C to N for example. I think sgf got a potential subtype that he could make a transition towards. So this shows that one of the dichotomies might have somewhat primary role compared to second or those two can be pretty even which should make subtype quite solid.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

  20. #580
    growing cakes on some ropes Vex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Bakery
    Posts
    393
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    NEXT TIME ON THE 16 T:

    Does Gulenko actually assign two subtypes?

    Who will win the argument about rules? Will we find out why are people so fixated on that?

    Is JOA truly an EIE-N?

    Is there more to Gulenko’s hidden methods? Or is it just all heresy along with Socionics?

    What will be the next derail?

    TUNE IN NEXT TIME ON THE 16 T TO FIND OUT!




    BORN TO TYPE
    WORLD IS A SOCIONIKA
    心理学 Type Em All 1991
    I am jung fan

    410,757,864,530 PEOPLE TYPED




  21. #581
    scientist donkey BrightDemonSheep96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On a toilet, right above you
    TIM
    ILE-H LEVF/omnibeta
    Posts
    6,454
    Mentioned
    272 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    In case of transsub please consult Gulenko before taking any drastic measures.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

  22. #582
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justalitnerdxx View Post
    oh right, what was your process like? I went through it at the end of August 2020. Although maybe they have refined it now? I only got one subtype whereas some others seem to have been given two
    I got one subtype. From what I understand, the one subtype you get is the external subtype, as in how you are socially. The 2nd subtype is internal, as in how you are in personal relationships. You could probably figure out your internal sub-type. Donald Trump is SEE-DD, meaning he’s double dominant sub (yikes). My mom is SEE-DN. I honestly think I’m SEE-NN. How I am socially with strangers is how I am personally.

  23. #583
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    oh, ok. This is the two subtype theory that you guys were talking about.
    It’s not really that you “switch” off. It’s more like the main one is how you are externally/socially. The second one is how you are privately, personally with the ones you’re closest. I think most people can sort out the second one and it’s possible to be double. I think I’m NN.

  24. #584
    Doctor of Socionics First Class Socionics Is Not A Cult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I get so damn sick of all these know-it-all hobbyists with their worthless words wanking off to their bullshit Se typing anime characters with DCNH subtypes using their over 30 seconds of experience so they can maintain their fakeass air of intellectualism.

    They should return to their personal gyms and exercise their brains.

  25. #585
    ˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚*・༓ ‧͙⁺˚ aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI-N™
    Posts
    1,793
    Mentioned
    404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiana View Post
    It’s not really that you “switch” off. It’s more like the main one is how you are externally/socially. The second one is how you are privately, personally with the ones you’re closest. I think most people can sort out the second one and it’s possible to be double. I think I’m NN.
    Interesting! Thanks

    Hmm I think I could be NH, but not sure. Will have to read more.
    𝓽𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓻
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  26. #586
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Socionics Is Not A Cult View Post
    I get so damn sick of all these know-it-all hobbyists with their worthless words wanking off to their bullshit Se typing anime characters with DCNH subtypes using their over 30 seconds of experience so they can maintain their fakeass air of intellectualism.

    They should return to their personal gyms and exercise their brains.
    That doesn’t make any sense. Se isn’t about intellectualism. You really need to hit the books and learn the basics. All you ever do is spout nonsense and defend people who cling onto their delusional self-typing. This thread is for people who got typed by Dr. Gulenko. Why are you even here?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  27. #587
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    Interesting! Thanks

    Hmm I think I could be NH, but not sure. Will have to read more.
    It’s not uncommon for most people to be H as second, even as first sub. I thought I could be C in private because I did give the DCNH SEE descriptions to a few friends and they independently think my relations with them is C but I think double normalizing sounds more suited because internally I’m really steady. I have to read more to get a clearer picture, but I know I’m either NC or NN.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  28. #588
    Doctor of Socionics First Class Socionics Is Not A Cult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiana View Post
    That doesn’t make any sense. Se isn’t about intellectualism. You really need to hit the books and learn the basics. All you ever do is spout nonsense and defend people who cling onto their delusional self-typing. This thread is for people who got typed by Dr. Gulenko. Why are you even here?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    The only reason you resort to your word spells is because you know you could not beat me in a fight. This thread is for Gulenko's typing of forum members and for forum members to resort to personal attacks for sport rather than limiting themselves to the safety of their personal gyms. I was trained in Tibet by the Dalai Lama and have over thirty years of boxing experience and other wordplay.

    Sent from my Mind using Karma Psychic Fists

  29. #589
    growing cakes on some ropes Vex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Bakery
    Posts
    393
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Socionics Is Not A Cult View Post
    I get so damn sick of all these know-it-all hobbyists with their worthless words wanking off to their bullshit Se typing anime characters with DCNH subtypes using their over 30 seconds of experience so they can maintain their fakeass air of intellectualism.

    They should return to their personal gyms and exercise their brains.
    Tom Nook - LIE-C or SLE-C (I'm thinking SLE-C though)









    BORN TO TYPE
    WORLD IS A SOCIONIKA
    心理学 Type Em All 1991
    I am jung fan

    410,757,864,530 PEOPLE TYPED




  30. #590
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    6,899
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Socionics Is Not A Cult View Post
    I get so damn sick of all these know-it-all hobbyists with their worthless words wanking off to their bullshit Se typing anime characters with DCNH subtypes using their over 30 seconds of experience so they can maintain their fakeass air of intellectualism.

    They should return to their personal gyms and exercise their brains.
    Whatever happened to you, man? You used to be so cool. Now you're just a jerk.

  31. #591
    Doctor of Socionics First Class Socionics Is Not A Cult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerxe View Post
    Whatever happened to you, man? You used to be so cool. Now you're just a jerk.
    Reflecting what I see rather than being my own light has distorted my gospel.

  32. #592
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    3,001
    Mentioned
    224 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dead account View Post
    maybe another important thing to mention: subtypes have a huge influence on ITR, to the point that they can soften really bad relationships like supervision. if the supervisor is a normalising subtype and the supervisee a dominant subtype, then the relationship might still be quite comfortable, because the normalising subtype won't be able to pressure the dominant subtype all that much, but if it's the other way around, the relationship might become unbearable (imagine a dominant SLE putting pressure on a normalsing LII for example).
    Nice subtype combination + bad main type compatibility is the source for a lot of confusion also. The person seems great - in the beginning, but when you spend more time together you get a weird feeling. One of my biggest disappointments in my early youth was dating a harmonizing LSE. She was of course super nice and interesting, and yet I felt internally insecure. I remember not knowing what to say and how to behave. Everything felt hollow. Despite dating for a year. And the strangeness of supervision chemistry was also very easy to mistake for real attraction, especially combined with H subtype. I've felt it is almost a miracle that Socionics is able to spell this out.
    A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
    (Jung on Si)


    My Pinterest

  33. #593
    Heaven and Hell Samson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    TIM
    LSI
    Posts
    451
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    "Complex Subtypes"???


    Hahaha! Reminds me of "subwings" in Enneagram. When a guy leaves the toilet seat up, is that D-H or H-C ? A show of neglectful dominance or a case of head-in-the-clouds? Clearly no N type would leave the toilet seat up, ever. Unless, they're N-H maybe... Cause they be rules in the streets, hobo in the sheets! LOL


  34. #594

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    12,883
    Mentioned
    1182 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    Anyway, fuck this shit. I’m leaving.
    "TIM EII typed by Gulenko"
    This can be not a joke. In other case why to run away. And close IEI was my main version for her.

    > Do you think that Gulenko can type people in just a couple of hours of online analysis better than they can type themselves though?

    To type good by youself takes significant and correct efforts, much of time and work.
    The main problem is doubtful accuracy of typers. But they may be helpful, as more sources independently agree about some of your traits - the more possible it's correct. This reduces the chance on mistakes and the time to understand own correct type.
    Last edited by Sol; 12-26-2020 at 11:38 PM.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  35. #595

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have no doubts that sbbds is an SLE. I remember mentioning that I traveled to japan last year and she directly approached me through messages. no INxx would do that.
    @Rusal: mb IEI @LemurianLo: more likely Se valuing, maybe LSI or ILI, leaning more towards the former. @Aramas: mb ILI

  36. #596
    LemurianLo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Eagleland
    TIM
    SLI-H 6w5 613 sp/sx
    Posts
    598
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dead account View Post
    I have no doubts that sbbds is an SLE. I remember mentioning that I traveled to japan last year and she directly approached me through messages. no INxx would do that.
    @Rusal: mb IEI @LemurianLo: more likely Se valuing, maybe LSI or ILI, leaning more towards the former. @Aramas: mb ILI
    I don't know what this thread is but anyone who doesn't think that I'm the most SLI-esque SLI on this site is just stupid as hell.
    "Now is the time to get serious about living your ideals. How long can you afford to put off who you really want to be? Your nobler self cannot wait any longer. Put your principles into practice – now. Stop the excuses and the procrastination. This is your life! You aren’t a child anymore. The sooner you set yourself to your spiritual program, the happier you will be. The longer you wait, the more you’ll be vulnerable to mediocrity and feel filled with shame and regret, because you know you are capable of better. From this instant on, vow to stop disappointing yourself. Separate yourself from the mob. Decide to be extraordinary and do what you need to do – now." - Epictetus

  37. #597

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LemurianLo View Post
    I don't know what this thread is but anyone who doesn't think that I'm the most SLI-esque SLI on this site is just stupid as hell.
    oh whoops I wanted to write that into the "your typings of forum members" thread.

  38. #598
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dead account View Post
    I have no doubts that sbbds is an SLE. I remember mentioning that I traveled to japan last year and she directly approached me through messages. no INxx would do that.
    @Rusal: mb IEI @LemurianLo: more likely Se valuing, maybe LSI or ILI, leaning more towards the former. @Aramas: mb ILI
    She put down “EII by Gulenko” as a dumb joke. She’s never been typed by anyone. I’ve discussed this with several people who have been typed by G and Sb is EIE. It’s very common for people to self-type as their activator. She’s obsessed with her image and stirs up the emotional atmosphere to try to get people to fall on their sword. Fi is ignored as she trashes people who don’t serve/support her image, even friends. She values Se as she starts a lot of shit but shrinks back from any Se used on her as she can’t deal with direct confrontations. She uses the same tactics as EIE Cleopatra with image campaigns and getting other people to take out her “enemies.”

  39. #599
    megedy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    IEI-C
    Posts
    164
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is a long thread I'm not caught up on yet (...there's so much squabbling in here lol), but finding out Gulenko does typing services is super fascinating. I've self-typed as EII for years now, I'm very curious to see what his opinion is & for the breakdown on his reasoning. Sent the email today.

  40. #600
    megedy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    IEI-C
    Posts
    164
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Consilience View Post
    To sum it up, most people found the process to be useful and interesting. But not everyone who got typed by Gulenko was sold on their typing after long consideration. So it comes down to what the individual thinks best fits them in the end. Some thought their typings were spot on. Others had hesitations but it helped them strongly consider their reasoning for their type and to get more clarity around it. In the end, it's up to you to decide whether or not Gulenko's typing fits you and not feel pressured by others to accept it. Some keep their typing private for this very reason. Best of luck to you.
    this is my thought reading some of the arguments here:



    is only theory, why you heff to be med?

    I'll share whatever he diagnoses me with after it's done. It's hard to see ourselves objectively sometimes, & one more person getting the Big G's authentic certification of type is another person for other people to dissect & compare to haha. & Thank you!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •