DarkAngelFireWolf69's typings of forum members AKA Big G SquaD

[ouronis]

Doge is just a bunch of scalpers taking advantage of brave hodlers

[Sanguine Miasma]

Take this from a 2D N: what you wrote doesn't mean much. Your list applies to many people, including me.

Yeah the above actually describes LSI to a T. Being confident about short term manouvering. Interesting thing is that EIE is not supposedly very much in tune with that. Ne demo types usually tell when and how to take risks in order to minimize actual risk.

[Sachmet]

Comparing everyone's questions with each other, it seems like he has some set questions and repeats a lot of the same ones depending on what type/subtype he's narrowing you down to. I almost wonder if it's sort of a control thing, like he expects certain answers from certain types and he uses the different responses to the same questions as comparisons.

He is researcher after all, so maybe he will update his theory according to new millenial study which he actually makes on us (I believe a lot of us are generation Y, based on videos I have seen so far), so completely new, fresh and up to date model Gy is comming... :-D

Also, I am actually curious about Olga's method. Does she actually type you based on which pictures you choose out of a lineup? Is there a lot more to it than that?

The typing process is based on your art, music and movie preferences. To be fair, there are also more typical and mundane questions about other things as well. I am not sure it's appropriate to write more detailes as it could spoil the typing process, but I can write I was very activelly involved in the process, my own participation was welcomed and encouraged the whole time. Maybe you could learn more about Olga's typing method by reading through her forum - she has database of her clients here. If you are interested, I can send you a direct link to my typing on the forum, so you can see my preferences and conlusions she made out of it.

I tried contacting her without success

Interesting. I didn't have any problems with reaching her. I wrote e-mail and she responded quickly. I can't remember whether I didn't pay for the service at first though...

Btw What typing did you get from Olga and what type did you consider yourself to be before that?

She typed me as IEI with EIE subtype. Someone on the website's forum also suggested ILI for me, but after considering Olga's arguments he sticked with IEI. I was torned between IEI and EII, since I have been typed as both in my country by two different profilers.

The million dollar question is if identical twins always have the same type or if it can be different.

I have identical twins, so I can keep you informed about similarities, differences, and estimated sociotype - I can't wait to observe this for myself ;-) However, just like @ooo writes, it's very obvious they are both different from each other in terms of temperament and behaviour and this have been apparent since they stoped to be just lying infants and started to perceive outer world more. And just as research says, even in my case baby A is more adventorous, bold, exporing, while baby B is more cautious, shy, thoughtful, sensitive... At least for now.

[Number 9 large]

The million dollar question is if identical twins always have the same type or if it can be different. Some typologies like Cognitive Type https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4w3tDChWTM claim that identical twins indeed have the same type. I don't know if there are any studies on this but I remember years ago watching a TV program where identical twins were reunited after spending their whole life apart and growing up in different families even in different countries. There were superficial differences in adulthood when it came weight, clothes etc. but their non-verbal behavior was strikingly similar despite completely different life environments. So the identical twin argument of type being inborn seems somewhat plausible.

When it comes to very extroverted types with both 1D Ni and 1D Ti such as ESE and SEE, it's not unusual for them to be completely lost when it comes to their own perception of their identity. They really just can't introspect logically.

they would be identicals, litterally everything is identical except fingerprints.

[Sachmet]

they would be identicals, litterally everything is identical except fingerprints.

Not true necessarily. I know, how you mean that, they suppose to be identical, and in the way they are (they share the same DNA), but... A lot of things can start to differ and as soon as they are developing in the womb. Those pregnancies are highly risky and often there are a lot of significant chalenges unique to identical twins they may have to face (sIUGR, TTTS etc.). These conditions during prenatal development may cause changes which can be ireversible. So as soon as seconds after they are born there can be two babies with completely different starting positions in terms of their medical state. Even if there is higher probability for having the same issues (eg. having cerebral palsy or being on the spectrum), even in identical twins this is not an absolute rule so just one twin can be affected despite they should be identical. I mean - they have the potential to be completely same, but because the fact each fetus can have different circumstances during pregnancy, the final outcome don't have to be the same.

[Number 9 large]

Not true necessarily. I know, how you mean that, they suppose to be identical, and in the way they are (they share the same DNA), but... A lot of things can start to differ and as soon as they are developing in the womb. Those pregnancies are highly risky and often there are a lot of significant chalenges unique to identical twins they may have to face (sIUGR, TTTS etc.). These conditions during prenatal development may cause changes which can be ireversible. So as soon as seconds after they are born there can be two babies with completely different starting positions in terms of their medical state. Even if there is higher probability for having the same issues (eg. having cerebral palsy or being on the spectrum), even in identical twins this is not an absolute rule so just one twin can be affected despite they should be identical. I mean - they have the potential to be completely same, but because the fact each fetus can have different circumstances during pregnancy, the final outcome don't have to be the same.

as u said DNA is the same. so their brain is the same. so their personality is the same. obviously when one gets braindamage from some random shit its different. but thats the exception, not the rule.

[Number 9 large]

G typed me LSI.

reading through her descriptions of functions noted the following:

Fi - not sure, prefer harmonious relationships over drama tho. Mercy and empathy is not me tho. I can read ppl's intentions and motivation with ease.
Fe - my worst function, I'm terrible at this, but I like ppl who have positive Fe. This function for me is trash and I always wish I was good at this / need someone who is good at this. help..

Ti - mostly me, minus the rules & regulation part. I don't give a rat's ass about rules, regulation, bureaucracy.
Te - boring, but I can do it just fine. This type of information is evident to me and when supplied by someone else it bores and annoys me.

Si - mostly me minus enjoying to relax and those boring hobbies, I need stimulation. Relaxing is boring and depressing.
Se - a necessity at times for self defense, otherwise I dislike ppl who are like this / find them abrasive and don't value it much. I have more ideological zeal and passion than drive for impact and material wealth.

Ni - describes me down to a T :/ fucking weird, it reads like it would be my main function. I can't stop doing this tbh.. its just there all the time. Also weirdly gr8 at time management, never being late, always intuitively know whats about to happen, who to trust, where the course of events is headed and how much time it takes me to do stuff, so I don't need to plan lol. Its rather instinctual.
Ne - I'm not good at this tbh, insight sure, but I doubt and have a hard time choosing options, prefer Ni. Brainstorming is nice.

in terms of vulnerable function both Feeling and Intuition rings true. Never had a problem with sensing or thinking related. I could be overestimating my Ni to be honest, but I always feel confident in it's use and enjoy every aspect of it. Its either Fe or Ne PolR. ..e_e considering I'm enneagram 6.. Ne PolR makes the most sense... but my Fe is weak and needs help FML.

Typical result I get on most socionics tests is ILI:



Re-calibrating for overestimation of Ni capabilities yields SLI or LSI:

man tests are just unreliable dude. try analysing ur behaviour thats been consistent over the years, like what kind of music do u listen to. what are/have been ur hobbies and why. what are ur general interests and why. try to analyse how u think. what functions u use. and in which spot. if ur confident at those functions and use them a lot its probably ego function. if ur confident but dont use them a lot its probably ur id, etc.

[SGF]

man tests are just unreliable dude. try analysing ur behaviour thats been consistent over the years, like what kind of music do u listen to. what are/have been ur hobbies and why. what are ur general interests and why. try to analyse how u think. what functions u use. and in which spot. if ur confident at those functions and use them a lot its probably ego function. if ur confident but dont use them a lot its probably ur id, etc.

ISTx

[Number 9 large]

ISTx

youll find it out eventually

[Sachmet]

as u said DNA is the same. so their brain is the same. so their personality is the same. obviously when one gets braindamage from some random shit its different. but thats the exception, not the rule.

I was reacting to your statement everything except fingerprints is the same. It's not. To claim so would be a huge simplifications. Even DNA doesn't have to be similar 100% of cases. There even don't have to be any kind of braindamage (although conditiones I mentioned in my post are 15% chances for each to occur, which is not statistically insignificant risk). Identical twins are not clones. Each of them act different, think different, feal different... Each from the set is an individual human being.

[SGF]

I was reacting to your statement everything except fingerprints is the same. It's not. To claim so would be a huge simplifications. Even DNA doesn't have to be similar 100% of cases. There even don't have to be any kind of braindamage (although conditiones I mentioned in my post are 15% chances for each to occur, which is not statistically insignificant risk). Identical twins are not clones. Each of them act different, think different, feal different... Each from the set is an individual human being.

Identical twins are the same right down to the personality, how they score on tests and so on its like having a clone of yourself. Even if reared apart, they will still essentially be the same:



A lot depends on one's genetics, much more than we are comfortable with admitting. Its usually other people's warped perception wish or want for twins to be different from each-other, when they aren't.

[Sanguine Miasma]

Identical twins are the same right down to the personality, how they score on tests and so on its like having a clone of yourself. Even if reared apart, they will still essentially be the same:



A lot depends on one's genetics, much more than we are comfortable with admitting. Its usually other people's warped perception wish or want for twins to be different from each-other, when they aren't.

<--- freaky both got pregnant same time both had a miscarriage...

[ooo]

ive been in school with 3 different pairs of twins, and met others during my lifetime, even dated one from a pair, and ye, they were not the same.

2 etero twins from jr high: one is now a single party guy, the other is happily engaged and always at home, from fb i see different works, interests etc

2 mono twins from high school: (they're even the most similar in their appereance) very different in character since the very scratch, were and went on studying different things and having different hobbies etc, theyre now working in the same business together, but one is the administrator and works behind the scenes, the other is the public figure and she models for their brand

2 mono twins from college: they really looked different from how they behaved, they were looking identical but when talking, moving, thinking... you could hardly say they were twins, they also couldn't stand each other. the one that was in class with me was a total lame jerk, while everybody loved her twin, a very sweet and popular girl

2 mono twins of which i dated 1: actually in this example the similarity in behavior is strong, although i found a sort of repulson for the other twin, he was less nice and more outspoken/extroverted than the twin i was with


now, there's a key component missing from your oh so deep analysis on twins, Numbo, shot and North, and whoever is thinking that genetics make up 100% of our characters, and it's that that's not the case. the experiences, the environment, the interactions adn the inputs everyone receives and engages in are main components of the development of character/individuality. AND they influence genetics too, because repetition and strong experiences have the power to modify our genetic wirings, so yes, you can even say that genetics is at the base of our everything, but by doing so you have to recognize even that that genetic makeup has influences outside of itself.

those many twins that show up on youtube as case studies for "look we're so identicals we do everythingk alike!" are obviosuly not healthy, nor common cases. make a google research on twins, and u'll be flooded with studies on how theyre different, while... write on google smt like " omo twins have the same personality" and u'll find only one or 2 results, claiming the things i already mentioned too.

[Sachmet]

Identical twins are the same right down to the personality, how they score on tests and so on its like having a clone of yourself. Even if reared apart, they will still essentially be the same

Again, not in 100% of cases. Even the title of the video you mentioned says "THESE identical twins have the same personalities", not a general statement. Anyway, I can imagine even choice of twins themselves is important - some of them really want to be as much similar as possible in everything, intentionally making actual clones from themselves, while some of them want the complete opposite. Suppose a lot of these won't go to such extremes. However we are getting at the area of nature vs. nurture here a little I guess. And I try to explain that even "nature" part can be influenced significantly from the beginning each twin fetuses life.

And as for a wishing part, I believe you are right to an extent. At least for me It's difficult to imagine anyone would want to be someone elses exact copy in everything. But I also think that everyone really is unique, there are no two exact human beings, just very, very simmilar (even within identical twins, identical triplets etc.). I don't say it's impossible for twins to have the same sociotype, because as I understand it even among people of the same type there are certain differences, no matter how subtle. I just don't agree with the generalized statement identical twins to be absolutly and completely "identical" in everything. That's simply wrong conclusion.

[Number 9 large]

I was reacting to your statement everything except fingerprints is the same. It's not. To claim so would be a huge simplifications. Even DNA doesn't have to be similar 100% of cases. There even don't have to be any kind of braindamage (although conditiones I mentioned in my post are 15% chances for each to occur, which is not statistically insignificant risk). Identical twins are not clones. Each of them act different, think different, feal different... Each from the set is an individual human being.

i guess you dont know what identical means. since ur too retarded to understand english, let me explain at the hand of a beautiful source:

identical

adjective

• 1.
  similar in every detail; exactly alike.
  "four girls in identical green outfits"
  
  
  
  
  
  

[Sachmet]

i guess you dont know what identical means. since ur too retarded to understand english, let me explain at the hand of a beautiful source:

identical

adjective

• 1.
  similar in every detail; exactly alike.
  "four girls in identical green outfits"

And I quess you are only able to understand things in very literal, limited and symplifying way. The fact someone has the same genetic pottential doesn't mean there will be the same development, as I mentioned earlier. Maybe when you read some actual research or study about identical twins, you will be able to contribute something meaningful in this discussion.

[Number 9 large]

And I quess you are only able to understand things in very literal, limited and symplifying way. The fact someone has the same genetic pottential doesn't mean there will be the same development, as I mentioned earlier. Maybe when you read some actual research or study about identical twins, you will be able to contribute something meaningful in this discussion.

but they will still be identical twins. i never said that they were 100% the same or have the same development. i thought it was obvious that 2 different people cant develop exactly the same as they litterally take up space somewhere else so their experience will always be different. did that really need to be explained? the question was whether their personality is the same. personality is genetic. they have the same genetic material cuz they are IDENTICAL twins. therefore the answer is yes and u can stfu.

[Megatrop]

as u said DNA is the same. so their brain is the same. so their personality is the same. obviously when one gets braindamage from some random shit its different. but thats the exception, not the rule.

The brain is not the same. It has neuroplasticity that adapts to the environment early on in life and tends to crystalize as years go by
It's a big assumption to conclude that DNA is the same therefore type is the same.

[Sachmet]

but they will still be identical twins. i never said that they were 100% the same or have the same development. i thought it was obvious that 2 different people cant develop exactly the same as they litterally take up space somewhere else so their experience will always be different. did that really need to be explained? the question was whether their personality is the same. personality is genetic. they have the same genetic material cuz they are IDENTICAL twins. therefore the answer is yes and u can stfu.

they would be identicals, litterally everything is identical except fingerprints.

You said that. Never mind, it seems each of us has a different opinion and I want waste my time and energy on someone who is not willing to listen. And making this personal and offend me by being retarded or not able to understand english language - it's really lame, dude.

[Number 9 large]

The brain is not the same. It has neuroplasticity that adapts to the environment early on in life and tends to crystalize as years go by
It's a big assumption to conclude that DNA is the same therefore type is the same.

its not a big assumption because type is inborn.

[Number 9 large]

You said that. Never mind, it seems each of us has a different opinion and I want waste my time and energy on someone who is not willing to listen. And making this personal and offend me by being retarded or not able to understand english language - it's really lame, dude.

i guess u took me literally.

[SGF]

youll find it out eventually

ISTj/LSI - MBTI ISTP that makes the most sense. A non "J"-ish enneagram 6.

[Sachmet]

Received results today. LII-N. Not agree with the subtype, however LII was one of four possible types I considered for myself.

[Alive]

Received results today. LII-N. Not agree with the subtype, however LII was one of four possible types I considered for myself.

I rarely type subtypes through videos but l also had N in mind for you. would be cool if you're an LII. haven't seen many female examples of our type. might rewatch your videos in the next few days.

[Sachmet]

I rarely type subtypes through videos but l also had N in mind for you. would be cool if you're an LII. haven't seen many female examples of our type. might rewatch your videos in the next few days.

May I ask why did you think so? While I was reading through DarkAngelFireWolf69's website material, I felt harmonizing or creative subtype would be a better fit for me. However, I'm not familiar very much with DCNH theory yet, so I'm not discarding this possibility..

If you are interested, I could send you link with a part of my video I sent to DarkAngelFireWolf69. Not ready to share it publicly. Not after those mean comments I get here ;-) In fact, I'm considering to remove my video I shared, so if you want to rewatch it, please do so quickly... :-D

[Lolita]

May I ask why did you think so? While I was reading through DarkAngelFireWolf69's website material, I felt harmonizing or creative subtype would be a better fit for me. However, I'm not familiar very much with DCNH theory yet, so I'm not discarding this possibility..

If you are interested, I could send you link with a part of my video I sent to DarkAngelFireWolf69. Not ready to share it publicly. Not after those mean comments I get here ;-) In fact, I'm considering to remove my video I shared, so if you want to rewatch it, please do so quickly... :-D

I would advise you and all the other honest people who got typed by G to not publicly show their typing videos because that’s self-exposure and there’s a lot of mentally ill people on here that play psychological games and use what they can against others and piggyback off people’s videos to scam results. I showed my video to a few but they were all already typed by G.

Normalizing subtype modeled after IJ temperament so there’s development emphasis on Ti and Fi. Aster (on hiatus) is IEI-N and I’m SEE-N. Aster is IP with IJ temperament so she’s a more stable and consistent IEI and I’m an EP with IJ temperament so I’m a more restrained and less impulsive SEE. You’re IJ with IJ temperament which is to say you’re very stable and consistent.

And wow. Ti lead females are very rare.

[Megatrop]

Received results today. LII-N. Not agree with the subtype, however LII was one of four possible types I considered for myself.

yeah, you hit me with a pretty strong INxx vibe

What exactly were the types you had considered for yourself before?

[Tallmo]

May I ask why did you think so? While I was reading through DarkAngelFireWolf69's website material, I felt harmonizing or creative subtype would be a better fit for me. However, I'm not familiar very much with DCNH theory yet, so I'm not discarding this possibility..

It's pretty important to meet real people of all subtypes from your own type. The subtype changes the chemistry and you can then see where you stand. The descriptions isolate the DCNH phenomenon, but in real life people have more sides to them, and you might not even identify that much with your DCNH subtype as long as you are unaware of it. It gets clearer after comparing yourself with other identicals.

[Subteigh]

its not a big assumption because type is inborn.

I've heard it said that DNA is a recipe, not a blueprint, but it seems it is also said that DNA isn't a recipe either.

Genetics and environment are both important generally, and the importance will vary from person to person regarding their effect on personality.

[Number 9 large]

I've heard it said that DNA is a recipe, not a blueprint, but it seems it is also said that DNA isn't a recipe either.

Genetics and environment are both important generally, and the importance will vary from person to person regarding their effect on personality.

no you dont get it. genetics and environment have influence on your BEHAVIOUR. personality, however, is inborn and has nothing to do with environment.

[Subteigh]

no you dont get it. genetics and environment have influence on your BEHAVIOUR. personality, however, is inborn and has nothing to do with environment.

How are you defining "personality"? Do you have any evidence?

[Tallmo]

The influence from environment on personality is pretty clear when comparing people from different cultures. If someone had adopted me right after I was born and placed me in China, Italy, an African tribe, with Inuits, in New York or in ancient Egypt I would be very different from whom I am now.

[Sanguine Miasma]

A sociotype is not a personality itself. Just roots.

[Number 9 large]

How are you defining "personality"? Do you have any evidence?

i dont need evidence cuz im not Te valuing

[Sachmet]

I would advise you and all the other honest people who got typed by G to not publicly show their typing videos because that’s self-exposure and there’s a lot of mentally ill people on here that play psychological games and use what they can against others and piggyback off people’s videos to scam results. I showed my video to a few but they were all already typed by G.

Thank you for your concern and kind advice. Even though I admit I am still somehow naive believing other people have mainly good intentions as it's hard for me to find any meaningful reason why would anyone willingly behave badly or cruelly, I am careful with sharing personal data. So if you see my video, be sure I am showing only parts I am relatively comfortable with others to learn about me. Things which are really personal or sensitive stay hidden from the world.

Normalizing subtype modeled after IJ temperament so there’s development emphasis on Ti and Fi. Aster (on hiatus) is IEI-N and I’m SEE-N. Aster is IP with IJ temperament so she’s a more stable and consistent IEI and I’m an EP with IJ temperament so I’m a more restrained and less impulsive SEE. You’re IJ with IJ temperament which is to say you’re very stable and consistent.

Well, there is a problem I have with IJ temperament. I wouldn't say I am very much consistent. I have long-term hobbies which I do follow, but I shift my attention between them rather quickly and a lot of projects I start I don't finish right away (or never or I don't even start and just imagining doing them). Being called "calm and stable" is not how I would call myself and I doubt anyone who knows me well would go with this characteristic either. Although this could be how strangers or aquitances probably perceive me (as I try not to show my feelings to everyone), people who I spend a lot of time with and know me well would agree I am far away from that. I have very strong internal feelings. My neuroticism have been always very high - I get sad easily, I get depressed easily, I get offended easily. My mood can be spoiled just like that and change a lot during a short periond of time. However, you won't likely to see this if I'm not willing to show it. But I'll show all this in full intensity if we are close enough – my „poor chosen“ people could probably tell you how dramatic and oversensitive I can be from time to time. In fact this is something I read is somehow typical for IEI, which I also considered for myself. But with IEI I have problem with Beta quadra... "Calm and stable" also seems like an direct opposite of what Enneagram type 4 is supposed to be. But in these circumstances it would be easy to understand where the feelings of alienation and being so much weird and different came from being LII female.

And wow. Ti lead females are very rare.

I admit, this all brought up together would be even more rare - being a female LII and type Four as well. With identical twins (chance for spontaneus conception is lesser than 0,5%). Hmm, sounds super rare to me and it feels... soo good :-D

Anyway, for the sake of my marriage I also hope DarkAngelFireWolf69 is wrong, because I am pretty sure my husband is ILI and quasi-identicals don't have very good reputation as far as I have read...

yeah, you hit me with a pretty strong INxx vibe

Well, some of those people who where discussing below the video had a serious S vibe from me. I would like to know how does an intuitive and sensing vibe looks like. I guess it's for obvious reasons hard to describe a vibe, but I'm curious if you could try? ;-)

What exactly were the types you had considered for yourself before?

I considred EII, LII, IEI, ILI and SEI for myself and have been typed as EII and IEI by socionics profilers (and as INFP, INFJ and INTJ by MBTI profilers). So I would say it's relatively safe to claim myself to be INxx at this poit. However, vultologists typed me as ISFP...Hm...

It's pretty important to meet real people of all subtypes from your own type. The subtype changes the chemistry and you can then see where you stand. The descriptions isolate the DCNH phenomenon, but in real life people have more sides to them, and you might not even identify that much with your DCNH subtype as long as you are unaware of it. It gets clearer after comparing yourself with other identicals.

I would like to have that kind of comparision. As I think more about this, I really am not sure how DarkAngelFireWolf69 came to his conclusion. As I wrote above I have my doubts regarding IJ temperament. And being even more extreme version of it, which is what effect of normalizing subtype should have, as Lolita mentioned, sounds very inprobable to me. Here I really believe DarkAngelFireWolf69 has subtype wrong and if I really am an LII then I fit harmonizing subtype the most. The evidence for this could be my conscious effort in developing and improving people skills (I started this journey as very socially awkward but gifted child) and interest in humans in the first place (as oppose to somewhat „inanimate“ sphere of interests which a lot of logicians are supposed to have and which I see as something far beyond Fi role) as well as the fact so many MBTI and Socionics profilers (Olga Tangemann, Ben Vaserlan, profilers in my country) typed me as ethical (or MBTI Feeler) type, which could be H subtype just mistakenly interpreted as an F attitude.

[Subteigh]

i dont need evidence cuz im not Te valuing

How are you defining "personality"? How do you know you're not Te valuing?

[Sachmet]

I see Fe as mechanism via which there is intention to impact others moods, and very clearly (outward) display of your own.

Do you think I have Fe as creative function? Well, my primary intention is not to impact anyone's mood (as I don't like if someone is trying to impact my mood either). By having my feelings (which I consider highly intimate and personal matter to me) I am folowing rather my own agenda - avoid looking awkward or inapropriate and preventing possible negative response like rejection, misunderstanding, criticism...

With Fe creative ofc it will come and go but you can have deep and strong internal feelings, be enneagram 4, and be EII (for example). They are not mutually exclusive.

I also believe every type could be any type in any those two systems, but I still think some combinations are more likely to happen than others.

[Megatrop]

Well, some of those people who where discussing below the video had a serious S vibe from me. I would like to know how does an intuitive and sensing vibe looks like. I guess it's for obvious reasons hard to describe a vibe, but I'm curious if you could try? ;-)

You have a somewhat detached and idealistic wording, that's the most concrete I can give to this moment, and I'm bad at explaining how I come to conclusions, so I hope you know what I mean

[Sachmet]

You have a somewhat detached and idealistic wording, that's the most concrete I can give to this moment, and I'm bad at explaining how I come to conclusions, so I hope you know what I mean

Hope these typing procesess are not so much influenced by the fact English is not my first language. When I was interested in being typed by Timur Protsky this was my main concern as his typing method was very dependent on semantic analysis. There was questionnaire to fill and providing definitions of certain terms was important part of it. And while I think my Enghlish is not bad I think the fact you are not a native speaker can be limiting in the typing process where every chosen word matters. However, when I was trying to find it yesterday, tha page was gone, so maybe he doesn't use it anymore...

And yes, I see your point, thank you!

[Number 9 large]

How are you defining "personality"? How do you know you're not Te valuing?

I define personality basically as your personality type enneagram/socionics. Its clearly inborn as there are already clear differences between children in personality.

Im not Te valuing because I dont fit those descriptions