The Manifesto Project

[Socionics Is A Cult]

There's this project called The Manifesto Project.

If you create a free account, you can download their spreadsheet which scores all the various party manifestoes they have on record for many countries based on their policies, but also by how left or right wing they are, amongst other metrics. You should also download the Codebook if you are interested.

I made a composite score of issues important to me which I then weighted by importance ("Environmental Protection", "Anti-Growth Economy", and "Democracy" were the joint most important ones). If you want to do something similar, maybe I could give you some tips.

@khcs was quite right, the Democrats in the USA are quite left-wing, at least judging by their score for 2016 (the database doesn't have the 2020 election yet) (a 'rile' score of -20.578 - only the manifestoes of 1952, 1980, and 1972 scored higher): https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...=1#post1416889

 

The 18 issues I used for my weighting:
1) Military (weighting of 7.5)
Composed of two metrics:
per104 reversed (lower scores I considered better) + per105

per104 Military: Positive
The importance of external security and defence. May include statements concerning:•The need to maintain or increase military expenditure;•The need to secure adequate manpower in the military;•The need to modernise armed forces and improve military strength;•The need for rearmament and self-defence;•The need to keep military treaty obligations.

per105 Military: Negative
Negative references to the military or use of military power to solve conflicts. References to the ‘evils of war’. May include references to:•Decreasing military expenditures;•Disarmament;•Reduced or abolished conscription

2) Peace (weighting of 7.5)

per106 Peace
Any declaration of belief in peace and peaceful means of solving crises– absent reference to the military. May include:•Peace as a general goal;•Desirability of countries joining in negotiations with hostile countries;•Ending wars in order to establish peace.

3) Internationalism (weighting of 7.5)
Composed of two metrics:
per107 + per109 reversed (lower scores I considered better)
(I actually made a mistake and forgot the per109 aspect so may re-do my scores when I have time).

per107 Internationalism: Positive
Need for international co-operation, including co-operation with specific countries other than those coded in 101. May also include references to the:•Need for aid to developing countries;•Need for world planning of resources;•Support for global governance;•Need for international courts;•Support for UN or other international organisations.

per109 Internationalism: Negative
Negative references to international co-operation. Favourable mentions of national independence and sovereignty with regard to the manifesto country’s foreign policy, isolation and/or unilateralism as opposed to internationalism.

4) Democracy (weighting of 10)

per202 Democracy
Favourable mentions of democracy as the “only game in town”. General support for the manifesto country’s democracy. May also include:•Democracy as method or goal in national, international or other organisations (e.g. labour unions, political parties etc.);•The need for the involvement of all citizens in political decision-making;•Support for either direct or representative democracy;•Support for parts of democratic regimes (rule of law, division of powers, independence of courts etc.).

5) Decentralization (weighting of 5)
Composed of two metrics:
per301 + per302 reversed (lower scores I considered better)

per301 Decentralization
Support for federalism or decentralisation of political and/or economic power. May include:•Favourable mentions of the territorial subsidiary principle;•More autonomy for any sub-national level in policy making and/or economics, including municipalities;•Support for the continuation and importance of local and regional customs and symbols and/or deference to local expertise;•Favourable mentions of special consideration for sub-national areas.

per302 Centralisation
General opposition to political decision-making at lower political levels. Support for unitary government and for more centralisation in political and administrative procedures

6) Market Regulation (weighting of 7.5)
per403 Market Regulation
Support for policies designed to create a fair and open economic market. May include:•Calls for increased consumer protection;•Increasing economic competition by preventing monopolies and other actions disrupting the functioning of the market;•Defence of small businesses against disruptive powers of big businesses;•Social market economy.

7) Protectionism (weighting of 7.5)
Composed of two metrics:
per406 reversed (lower scores I considered better) + per407

per406 Protectionism: Positive
Favourable mentions of extending or maintaining the protection of internal markets (by the manifesto or other countries). Measures may include:•Tariffs;•Quota restrictions;•Export subsidies.

per407 Protectionism: Negative
Support for the concept of free trade and open markets. Call for abolishing all means of market protection (in the manifesto or any other country).
8) Keynesian Demand Management (weighting of 7.5)

per409 Keynesian Demand Management
Favourable mentions of demand side oriented economic policies (assistance to consumers rather than businesses). Particularly includes increase private demand through •Increasing public demand;•Increasing social expenditures. May also include:•Stabilisation in the face of depression;•Government stimulus plans in the face of economic crises.

9) Technology and Infrastructure (weighting of 7.5)

per411 Technology and Infrastructure: Positive
Importance of modernisation of industry and updated methods of transport and communication. May include:•Importance of science and technological developments in industry;•Need for training and research within the economy (This does not imply education in general (see category 506);•Calls for public spending on infrastructure such as roads and bridges;•Support for public spending on technological infrastructure (e.g.: broadband internet, etc.)

10) Anti-Growth Economy (weighting of 10)

per416 Anti-Growth Economy: Positive
Favourable mentions of anti-growth politics. Rejection of the idea that all growth is good growth. Opposition to growth that causes environmental or societal harm. Call for sustainable economic development.
Note: This category was not used for Austria 1945-1979, for Australia, Japan and the United States up to 1980; for Belgium, Ireland, The Netherlands and New Zealand up to 1981; for Italy and Britain up to1983; for Denmark, Luxembourg and Israel up to 1984; for Canada, France and Sweden up to 1988; and for Norway up to 1989. Test codings, however, have shown that parties before the beginning of the1990s hardly ever advocated anti-growth policies.

11) Environmental Protection (weighting of 10)

per501 Environmental Protection
General policies in favour of protecting the environment, fighting climate change, and other “green” policies. For instance:•General preservation of natural resources;•Preservation of countryside, forests, etc.;•Protection of national parks;•Animal rights.

12) Culture (weighting of 5)

per502 Culture: Positive
Need for state funding of cultural and leisure facilities including arts and sport. May include:•The need to fund museums, art galleries, libraries etc.;•The need to encourage cultural mass media and worthwhile leisure activities, such as public sport clubs.

13) Equality (weighting of 5)

per503 Equality: Positive
Concept of social justice and the need for fair treatment of all people. This may include:•Special protection for underprivileged social groups;•Removal of class barriers;•Need for fair distribution of resources;•The end of discrimination (e.g. racial or sexual discrimination).

14) Welfare (weighting of 7.5)

Composed of two metrics:
per504 + per505 reversed (lower scores I considered better)

per504 Welfare State Expansion
Favourable mentions of need to introduce, maintain or expand any public social service or social security scheme. This includes, for ex-ample, government funding of:•Health care•Child care•Elder care and pensions•Social housing
Note: This category excludes education.

per505 Welfare State Limitation
Limiting state expenditures on social services or social security. Favourable mentions of the social subsidiary principle (i.e. private care before state care);

15) Education (weighting of 5)
Composed of two metrics:
per506 + per507 reversed (lower scores I considered better)

per506 Education Expansion
Need to expand and/or improve educational provision at all levels.
Note: This excludes technical training which is coded under 411.

per507 Education Limitation
Limiting state expenditure on education. May include:•The introduction or expansion of study fees at all educational levels•Increasing the number of private schools.

16) Nationalism (weighting of 7.5)
Composed of two metrics:
per601 reversed (lower scores I considered better) + per602

per601 National Way of Life: Positive
Favourable mentions of the manifesto country’s nation, history, and general appeals. May include:•Support for established national ideas;•General appeals to pride of citizenship;•Appeals to patriotism;•Appeals to nationalism;•Suspension of some freedoms in order to protect the state against subversion.

per602 National Way of Life: Negative
Unfavourable mentions of the manifesto country’s nation and history. May include:•Opposition to patriotism;•Opposition to nationalism;•Opposition to the existing national state, national pride, and national ideas.

17) Traditional Morality (weighting of 7.5)

Composed of two metrics:
per603 reversed (lower scores I considered better) + per604

per603 Traditional Morality: Positive
Favourable mentions of traditional and/or religious moral values. May include:•Prohibition, censorship and suppression of immorality and unseemly behaviour;•Maintenance and stability of the traditional family as a value;•Support for the role of religious institutions in state and society.

per604 Traditional Morality: Negative
Opposition to traditional and/or religious moral values. May include:•Support for divorce, abortion etc.;•General support for modern family composition;•Calls for the separation of church and state.

18) Law and Order (weighting of 7.5)
The reverse of per605.

per605 Law and Order: Positive
Favourable mentions of strict law enforcement, and tougher actions against domestic crime. Only refers to the enforcement of the status quo of the manifesto country’s law code. May include:•Increasing support and resources for the police;•Tougher attitudes in courts;•Importance of internal security

Seemingly the manifesto I give the highest rating that is in English is the 2017 manifesto of the Green Party of England and Wales (direct pdf file link).

[Socionics Is A Cult]

How I would have voted in every American election in the 1920-2016 period, albeit on one weighting of my current priorities:

The "Overall Score" is a ranked out of 1 of all party manifestoes in the database.

Election year	Party	Overall Score
1920	Democratic Party	0.560
1924	La Follette Progressive Party	0.773
1928	Democratic Party	0.658
1932	Democratic Party	0.434
1936	Democratic Party	0.377
1940	Democratic Party	0.479
1944	Democratic Party	0.473
1948	Progressive Party (H. Wallace)	0.650
1952	Democratic Party	0.786
1956	Democratic Party	0.838
1960	Democratic Party	0.665
1964	Democratic Party	0.638
1968	Democratic Party	0.676
1972	Democratic Party	0.695
1976	Democratic Party	0.673
1980	Democratic Party	0.575
1984	Democratic Party	0.909
1988	Democratic Party	0.527
1992	Democratic Party	0.446
1996	Democratic Party	0.590
2000	Democratic Party	0.894
2004	Democratic Party	0.407
2008	Democratic Party	0.531
2012	Democratic Party	0.840
2016	Democratic Party	0.967

Most likely, in 1924 and 1948, I would have voted Democrat for the presidency unless I was in a state where my votes was unlikely to matter.

All other parties ranked (for which there is data):

Election year	Party	Overall Score
1924	Democratic Party	0.731
1948	Democratic Party	0.612
1988	Republican Party	0.509
1960	Republican Party	0.474
1948	Republican Party	0.464
2000	Republican Party	0.463
1980	Republican Party	0.426
2012	Republican Party	0.409
1956	Republican Party	0.404
1944	Republican Party	0.379
1972	Republican Party	0.379
1976	Republican Party	0.375
2016	Republican Party	0.373
1992	Republican Party	0.347
1952	Republican Party	0.329
1936	Republican Party	0.327
1928	Republican Party	0.309
1932	Republican Party	0.309
1984	Republican Party	0.275
2008	Republican Party	0.265
1924	Republican Party	0.244
1968	Republican Party	0.242
1996	Republican Party	0.223
2004	Republican Party	0.215
1920	Republican Party	0.203
1940	Republican Party	0.184
1964	Republican Party	0.142
1948	State’s Rights Party	0.034

[Socionics Is A Cult]

For the UK:

Election year	Party	Overall Score
1945	Labour Party	0.572
1950	Labour Party	0.643
1951	Liberal Party	0.368
1955	Labour Party	0.789
1959	Conservative Party	0.727
1964	Liberal Party	0.849
1966	Labour Party	0.568
1970	Labour Party	0.577
1974 (Feb)	Conservative Party	0.524
1974 (Oct)	Labour Party	0.611
1979	Liberal Party	0.873
1983	Labour Party	0.928
1987	Liberal Party & SDP alliance	0.735
1992	Labour Party	0.932
1997	Liberal Democrats	0.770
2001	Labour Party	0.666
1905	Liberal Democrats	0.779
2010	Liberal Democrats	0.643
2015	Green Party of England and Wales	0.985
2017	Green Party of England and Wales	0.995
2019	Green Party of England and Wales	0.974

The Green Party aren't strictly a national party so I could alternatively have put Liberal Democrats for 2015 and 2017 and Labour for 2019.

I have decided as a result that I will vote Green where possible, otherwise Liberal Democrat, otherwise Labour (it isn't always possible to vote Green or Liberal Democrat in local elections). I wouldn't have voted for Labour in 2019 under Jeremy Corbyn however.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

The parties that score highest for me in 53 countries, based on the most recent election in the database for the respective country:

country	Election year	Party	Overall Score
Spain	2019	United Left	0.998
Slovenia	2018	The Left	0.997
Norway	2017	Liberal Party	0.996
Luxembourg	2013	The Greens	0.995
Belgium	2019	Workers' Party of Belgium	0.984
Czech Republic	2017	Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia	0.983
Greece	2015	Coalition of the Radical Left	0.979
Iceland	2017	Bright Future	0.978
Hungary	2014	Democratic Coalition	0.977
Austria	2017	The Greens	0.976
Ireland	2016	Green Party	0.975
Australia	2016	Australian Greens	0.974
United Kingdom	2019	Green Party of England and Wales	0.974
Netherlands	2017	Green Left	0.972
Japan	2014	Social Democratic Party	0.967
United States	2016	Democratic Party	0.967
Turkey	2018	Republican People’s Party	0.965
Finland	2019	Finnish Social Democrats	0.962
Italy	2018	Free and Equal	0.960
France	2017	Indomitable France	0.956
Portugal	2015	Left Bloc	0.954
Canada	2015	Liberal Party of Canada	0.952
Switzerland	2019	Swiss Labour Party	0.944
Sweden	2018	Left Party	0.942
Lithuania	2016	Liberal Movement	0.937
New Zealand	2017	New Zealand Labour Party	0.936
Israel	2015	There is a Future	0.913
North Macedonia	2016	Social-Democratic League of Macedonia & Democratic Union for Integration coalition	0.906
Poland	2015	Civic Platform	0.897
Mexico	2018	Alliance for Change	0.888
Croatia	2016	People's coalition	0.882
Malta	1996	Labour Party	0.876
Cyprus	2016	Movement of Ecologists - Citizens' Cooperation	0.864
Serbia	2016	For a just Serbia (DS, Nova, DSHV, ZZS)	0.836
Georgia	2016	Georgian Dream - Democratic Georgia	0.828
Montenegro	2016	Key Coalition	0.818
Slovakia	2016	Ordinary People and Independent Personalities	0.817
South Korea	2016	Justice Party	0.808
Estonia	2015	Estonian Center Party	0.796
Bosnia-Herzegovina	2018	Social Democratic Party of Bosnia and Herzegovina	0.749
Moldova	2014	Liberal Party	0.736
Romania	2016	People's Movement Party	0.727
Denmark	2015	Red-Green Unity List	0.712
Belarus	1995	Party of Women ‘Nadzeja’	0.677
Albania	2001	Social Democratic Party of Albania	0.675
South Africa	2014	African National Congress	0.642
Bulgaria	2017	Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria	0.631
Ukraine	2012	Party of Regions	0.618
Armenia	2012	Republican Party of Armenia	0.579
Latvia	2018	Development/For!	0.560
Azerbaijan	2000	New Azerbaijan Party	0.507
Russia	2011	Just Russia	0.499
Sri Lanka	1977	Sri Lanka Freedom Party	0.466

This doesn't ignore parties that are only regional parties.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

@Subteigh, weird that you have Civic Platform for Poland but not The Left instead (yes, The Left is way more leftist and way more liberal in social cases). Idk about other countries. Maybe it's because data is not up-to-date (The Left was formed in 2019).

Yeah, 2015 is the most recent Polish election they have data for. I supposedly give Polish Peasants' Party a score of 0.756, Modern a score of 0.732 and the United Left a score of 0.684. The best on "Environmental Protection" + "Anti-Growth Economy" (which in the codebook, are defined in quite pro-environmental ways) was Modern, however.

edit: revised scores

[Socionics Is A Cult]

The 18 issues I used for my weighting:
1) Military (weighting of 7.5)
Composed of two metrics:
per104 reversed (lower scores I considered better) + per105

per104 Military: Positive
The importance of external security and defence. May include statements concerning:•The need to maintain or increase military expenditure;•The need to secure adequate manpower in the military;•The need to modernise armed forces and improve military strength;•The need for rearmament and self-defence;•The need to keep military treaty obligations.

per105 Military: Negative
Negative references to the military or use of military power to solve conflicts. References to the ‘evils of war’. May include references to:•Decreasing military expenditures;•Disarmament;•Reduced or abolished conscription

2) Peace (weighting of 7.5)

per106 Peace
Any declaration of belief in peace and peaceful means of solving crises– absent reference to the military. May include:•Peace as a general goal;•Desirability of countries joining in negotiations with hostile countries;•Ending wars in order to establish peace.

3) Internationalism (weighting of 7.5)
Composed of two metrics:
per107 + per109 reversed (lower scores I considered better)
(I actually made a mistake and forgot the per109 aspect so may re-do my scores when I have time).

per107 Internationalism: Positive
Need for international co-operation, including co-operation with specific countries other than those coded in 101. May also include references to the:•Need for aid to developing countries;•Need for world planning of resources;•Support for global governance;•Need for international courts;•Support for UN or other international organisations.

per109 Internationalism: Negative
Negative references to international co-operation. Favourable mentions of national independence and sovereignty with regard to the manifesto country’s foreign policy, isolation and/or unilateralism as opposed to internationalism.

4) Democracy (weighting of 10)

per202 Democracy
Favourable mentions of democracy as the “only game in town”. General support for the manifesto country’s democracy. May also include:•Democracy as method or goal in national, international or other organisations (e.g. labour unions, political parties etc.);•The need for the involvement of all citizens in political decision-making;•Support for either direct or representative democracy;•Support for parts of democratic regimes (rule of law, division of powers, independence of courts etc.).

5) Decentralization (weighting of 5)
Composed of two metrics:
per301 + per302 reversed (lower scores I considered better)

per301 Decentralization
Support for federalism or decentralisation of political and/or economic power. May include:•Favourable mentions of the territorial subsidiary principle;•More autonomy for any sub-national level in policy making and/or economics, including municipalities;•Support for the continuation and importance of local and regional customs and symbols and/or deference to local expertise;•Favourable mentions of special consideration for sub-national areas.

per302 Centralisation
General opposition to political decision-making at lower political levels. Support for unitary government and for more centralisation in political and administrative procedures

6) Market Regulation (weighting of 7.5)
per403 Market Regulation
Support for policies designed to create a fair and open economic market. May include:•Calls for increased consumer protection;•Increasing economic competition by preventing monopolies and other actions disrupting the functioning of the market;•Defence of small businesses against disruptive powers of big businesses;•Social market economy.

7) Protectionism (weighting of 7.5)
Composed of two metrics:
per406 reversed (lower scores I considered better) + per407

per406 Protectionism: Positive
Favourable mentions of extending or maintaining the protection of internal markets (by the manifesto or other countries). Measures may include:•Tariffs;•Quota restrictions;•Export subsidies.

per407 Protectionism: Negative
Support for the concept of free trade and open markets. Call for abolishing all means of market protection (in the manifesto or any other country).

8) Keynesian Demand Management (weighting of 7.5)

per409 Keynesian Demand Management
Favourable mentions of demand side oriented economic policies (assistance to consumers rather than businesses). Particularly includes increase private demand through •Increasing public demand;•Increasing social expenditures. May also include:•Stabilisation in the face of depression;•Government stimulus plans in the face of economic crises.

9) Technology and Infrastructure (weighting of 7.5)

per411 Technology and Infrastructure: Positive
Importance of modernisation of industry and updated methods of transport and communication. May include:•Importance of science and technological developments in industry;•Need for training and research within the economy (This does not imply education in general (see category 506);•Calls for public spending on infrastructure such as roads and bridges;•Support for public spending on technological infrastructure (e.g.: broadband internet, etc.)

10) Anti-Growth Economy (weighting of 10)

per416 Anti-Growth Economy: Positive
Favourable mentions of anti-growth politics. Rejection of the idea that all growth is good growth. Opposition to growth that causes environmental or societal harm. Call for sustainable economic development.
Note: This category was not used for Austria 1945-1979, for Australia, Japan and the United States up to 1980; for Belgium, Ireland, The Netherlands and New Zealand up to 1981; for Italy and Britain up to1983; for Denmark, Luxembourg and Israel up to 1984; for Canada, France and Sweden up to 1988; and for Norway up to 1989. Test codings, however, have shown that parties before the beginning of the1990s hardly ever advocated anti-growth policies.

11) Environmental Protection (weighting of 10)

per501 Environmental Protection
General policies in favour of protecting the environment, fighting climate change, and other “green” policies. For instance:•General preservation of natural resources;•Preservation of countryside, forests, etc.;•Protection of national parks;•Animal rights.

12) Culture (weighting of 5)

per502 Culture: Positive
Need for state funding of cultural and leisure facilities including arts and sport. May include:•The need to fund museums, art galleries, libraries etc.;•The need to encourage cultural mass media and worthwhile leisure activities, such as public sport clubs.

13) Equality (weighting of 5)

per503 Equality: Positive
Concept of social justice and the need for fair treatment of all people. This may include:•Special protection for underprivileged social groups;•Removal of class barriers;•Need for fair distribution of resources;•The end of discrimination (e.g. racial or sexual discrimination).

14) Welfare (weighting of 7.5)

Composed of two metrics:
per504 + per505 reversed (lower scores I considered better)

per504 Welfare State Expansion
Favourable mentions of need to introduce, maintain or expand any public social service or social security scheme. This includes, for ex-ample, government funding of:•Health care•Child care•Elder care and pensions•Social housing
Note: This category excludes education.

per505 Welfare State Limitation
Limiting state expenditures on social services or social security. Favourable mentions of the social subsidiary principle (i.e. private care before state care);

15) Education (weighting of 5)
Composed of two metrics:
per506 + per507 reversed (lower scores I considered better)

per506 Education Expansion
Need to expand and/or improve educational provision at all levels.
Note: This excludes technical training which is coded under 411.

per507 Education Limitation
Limiting state expenditure on education. May include:•The introduction or expansion of study fees at all educational levels•Increasing the number of private schools.

16) Nationalism (weighting of 7.5)
Composed of two metrics:
per601 reversed (lower scores I considered better) + per602

per601 National Way of Life: Positive
Favourable mentions of the manifesto country’s nation, history, and general appeals. May include:•Support for established national ideas;•General appeals to pride of citizenship;•Appeals to patriotism;•Appeals to nationalism;•Suspension of some freedoms in order to protect the state against subversion.

per602 National Way of Life: Negative
Unfavourable mentions of the manifesto country’s nation and history. May include:•Opposition to patriotism;•Opposition to nationalism;•Opposition to the existing national state, national pride, and national ideas.

17) Traditional Morality (weighting of 7.5)

Composed of two metrics:
per603 reversed (lower scores I considered better) + per604

per603 Traditional Morality: Positive
Favourable mentions of traditional and/or religious moral values. May include:•Prohibition, censorship and suppression of immorality and unseemly behaviour;•Maintenance and stability of the traditional family as a value;•Support for the role of religious institutions in state and society.

per604 Traditional Morality: Negative
Opposition to traditional and/or religious moral values. May include:•Support for divorce, abortion etc.;•General support for modern family composition;•Calls for the separation of church and state.

18) Law and Order (weighting of 7.5)
The reverse of per605.

per605 Law and Order: Positive
Favourable mentions of strict law enforcement, and tougher actions against domestic crime. Only refers to the enforcement of the status quo of the manifesto country’s law code. May include:•Increasing support and resources for the police;•Tougher attitudes in courts;•Importance of internal security

[Socionics Is A Cult]

My updated ranking of parties. The ideal score would be 100.

I included the highest ranked party for each country in the database, as well as all parties that got at least 10% of the vote. Some countries have had more recent elections than mentioned below.

Some of the parties near the top sound surprising.

Country	edate	Party	Score
Chile	19 11 2017	Christian Democratic Party	76.4
Spain	10 11 2019	United Left	76.3
Chile	19 11 2017	Broad Front	75.5
Denmark	05 06 2019	Alternativ	74.9
Croatia	05 07 2020	We can!-political platform	73.6
Slovenia	03 06 2018	The Left	72.8
Germany	26 09 2021	Alliance‘90/Greens	72.3
Uruguay	26 10 2014	Broad Front	72.1
Norway	11 09 2017	Liberal Party	72.0
Spain	10 11 2019	We can	70.8
Greece	20 09 2015	Coalition of the Radical Left	70.6
Portugal	06 10 2019	Left Bloc	69.8
United Kingdom	12 12 2019	Liberal Democrats	69.6
Turkey	24 06 2018	Republican People’s Party	69.4
Iceland	28 10 2017	Bright Future	69.3
Netherlands	15 03 2017	Green Left	69.1
South Korea	15 04 2020	Justice Party	68.9
Luxembourg	20 10 2013	The Left	68.8
Austria	29 09 2019	Austrian Social Democratic Party	68.5
Ireland	26 02 2016	Green Party	67.7
Austria	29 09 2019	The Greens	67.7
Italy	04 03 2018	Free and Equal	67.4
United Kingdom	12 12 2019	Labour Party	67.3
Germany	26 09 2021	Social Democratic Party of Germany	67.3
Italy	04 03 2018	Democratic Party	66.8
France	11 06 2017	Indomitable France	66.7
Spain	10 11 2019	Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party	66.7
Australia	02 07 2016	Australian Greens	66.4
Turkey	24 06 2018	Peoples' Democratic Party	66.1
Luxembourg	20 10 2013	The Greens	66.0
Chile	19 11 2017	New Majority for Chile	66.0
Sweden	09 09 2018	Left Party	66.0
Finland	14 04 2019	Finnish Social Democrats	65.9
Czech Republic	21 10 2017	Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia	65.7
Canada	19 10 2015	Liberal Party of Canada	65.5
South Korea	15 04 2020	Democratic Party	65.0
Japan	14 12 2014	Social Democratic Party	64.8
Canada	19 10 2015	New Democratic Party	64.7
Germany	26 09 2021	Free Democratic Party	64.7
Luxembourg	20 10 2013	Socialist Workers’ Party of Luxembourg	64.6
Japan	14 12 2014	Japanese Communist Party	64.6
Estonia	03 03 2019	Estonian Center Party	64.3
Argentina	27 10 2019	Everyone's Front	63.8
United States	03 11 2020	Democratic Party	63.6
Netherlands	15 03 2017	Democrats‘66	63.5
Belgium	26 05 2019	Workers' Party of Belgium	63.4
Iceland	28 10 2017	Left Green Movement	63.2
Uruguay	26 10 2014	National Party	63.2
Montenegro	30 08 2020	Social Democrats of Montenegro	62.9
Finland	14 04 2019	Green Union	62.6
Luxembourg	20 10 2013	Democratic Party	62.5
Iceland	28 10 2017	Independence Party	62.5
Lithuania	09 10 2016	Lithuanian Social Democratic Party	62.4
Switzerland	20 10 2019	Green Party of Switzerland	62.3
Hungary	08 04 2018	Dialogue for Hungary	62.2
North Macedonia	11 12 2016	Social-Democratic League of Macedonia	62.1
Brazil	07 10 2018	The People happy again	60.7
Portugal	06 10 2019	Socialist Party	60.6
Poland	13 10 2019	Civic Coalition	60.3
Japan	14 12 2014	New Clean Government Party	60.2
Finland	14 04 2019	Finnish Centre	59.9
Australia	02 07 2016	Australian Labor Party	59.7
Japan	14 12 2014	Democratic Party of Japan	59.5
Moldova	24 02 2019	Liberal Party	59.0
Croatia	05 07 2020	Restart Coalition	58.5
Turkey	24 06 2018	Justice and Development Party	58.5
Norway	11 09 2017	Centre Party	58.2
Uruguay	26 10 2014	Colorado Party	57.6
New Zealand	23 09 2017	Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand	57.5
Norway	11 09 2017	Labour Party	57.5
Israel	02 03 2020	Blue and White	57.2
Portugal	06 10 2019	Social Democratic Party	57.1
Germany	26 09 2021	Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union	56.9
Bolivia	12 10 2014	Democratic Union	56.7
Italy	04 03 2018	Five Star Movement	56.6
Mexico	01 07 2018	Institutional Revolutionary Party	56.5
Ireland	26 02 2016	Soldiers of Destiny	55.8
Ireland	26 02 2016	We Ourselves	55.6
New Zealand	23 09 2017	New Zealand Labour Party	55.6
Czech Republic	21 10 2017	ANO 2011	55.6
Iceland	28 10 2017	The Alliance - Social Democratic Party of Iceland	55.3
Israel	02 03 2020	Joint List	55.2
Denmark	05 06 2019	Social Democratic Party	55.1
South Africa	08 05 2019	Democratic Alliance	54.9
South Africa	08 05 2019	African National Congress	54.6
North Macedonia	11 12 2016	Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization - Democratic Party for Macedonian National Unity	54.6
Montenegro	30 08 2020	Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro	53.9
Bosnia-Herzegovina	07 10 2018	Social Democratic Party of Bosnia and Herzegovina	53.9
Sweden	09 09 2018	Social Democratic Labour Party	53.9
Croatia	05 07 2020	Croatian Democratic Union	53.8
Czech Republic	21 10 2017	Czech Pirate Party	53.6
Georgia	08 10 2016	Georgian Dream - Democratic Georgia	53.4
Cyprus	22 05 2016	Movement of Ecologists - Citizens' Cooperation	53.2
Argentina	27 10 2019	Together for Change	53.1
Belarus	29 11 1995	Party of Women ‘Nadzeja’	53.0
Ireland	26 02 2016	Family of the Irish	53.0
Romania	11 12 2016	Social Democratic Party	52.9
Poland	13 10 2019	The Left	52.6
Denmark	05 06 2019	Liberals	52.2
Mexico	01 07 2018	Alliance for Change	52.1
Lithuania	09 10 2016	Lithuanian Peasant and Green Union	52.1
Brazil	07 10 2018	Soverign Brazil	51.8
Moldova	24 02 2019	Electoral blok NOW Platform DA and PAS	51.6
Malta	05 09 1998	Labour Party	51.5
Moldova	24 02 2019	Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova	51.2
Bosnia-Herzegovina	07 10 2018	Alliance of Independent Social Democrats	51.1
Netherlands	15 03 2017	Christian Democratic Appeal	51.0
Hungary	08 04 2018	Hungarian Socialist Party	51.0
Ukraine	21 07 2019	Opposition Platform - For Life	50.9
Mexico	01 07 2018	National Regeneration Movement	50.7
South Africa	08 05 2019	Economic Freedom Fighters	50.7
Serbia	21 06 2020	Alliance of Vojvodina Hungarians	50.6
Norway	11 09 2017	Conservative Party	50.6
Estonia	03 03 2019	Estonian Reform Party	50.3
Greece	25 01 2015	Coalition of the Radical Left	50.1
New Zealand	23 09 2017	New Zealand National Party	50.1
Switzerland	20 10 2019	Christian Democratic People’s Party of Switzerland	50.0
Slovakia	05 03 2016	Christian Democratic Movement	49.9
Belgium	26 05 2019	New Flemish Alliance	49.8
Albania	24 06 2001	Social Democratic Party of Albania	49.8
Cyprus	22 05 2016	Democratic Party	49.1
Japan	14 12 2014	Liberal Democratic Party	49.0
Bosnia-Herzegovina	07 10 2018	Party of Democratic Action	48.7
Finland	14 04 2019	National Coalition	48.7
Luxembourg	20 10 2013	Christian Social People’s Party	48.3
Armenia	06 05 2012	Republican Party of Armenia	47.9
Turkey	24 06 2018	National Action Party	47.6
Slovenia	03 06 2018	List of Marjan Šarec	47.5
Bulgaria	26 03 2017	Will	47.5
United Kingdom	12 12 2019	Conservative Party	46.7
Latvia	06 10 2018	Development/For!	46.3
Chile	19 11 2017	Chile let's go	46.3
Croatia	05 07 2020	Miroslav Škoro Homeland Movement	46.1
Finland	14 04 2019	True Finns	45.4
France	11 06 2017	Republic Onwards!	45.4
Poland	13 10 2019	Law and Justice	45.4
Austria	29 09 2019	Austrian People’s Party	45.3
Netherlands	15 03 2017	People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy	45.2
Slovakia	05 03 2016	Ordinary People and Independent Personalities	45.0
Bulgaria	26 03 2017	Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria	45.0
France	11 06 2017	National Front	44.9
Slovenia	03 06 2018	Slovenian Democratic Party	44.3
Albania	24 06 2001	Albanian Socialist Party	44.1
Malta	05 09 1998	Nationalist Party	43.9
Russia	04 12 2011	Just Russia	43.7
Iceland	28 10 2017	Progressive Party	43.6
Ukraine	21 07 2019	Servant of the People	43.2
Azerbaijan	05 11 2000	New Azerbaijan Party	43.0
Sri Lanka	01 07 1977	Sri Lanka Freedom Party	42.8
Estonia	03 03 2019	Pro Patria	42.7
Slovakia	05 03 2016	Freedom and Solidarity	42.7
Latvia	06 10 2018	Greens' and Farmers’ Union	42.6
Sweden	09 09 2018	Moderate Coalition Party	42.6
Switzerland	20 10 2019	FDP.The Liberals	42.6
Armenia	06 05 2012	Prosperous Armenia	42.5
Norway	11 09 2017	Progress Party	42.5
Cyprus	22 05 2016	Democratic Coalition	42.4
Bulgaria	26 03 2017	BSP for Bulgaria	42.4
Spain	10 11 2019	People's Party	42.2
Lithuania	09 10 2016	Homeland Union - Lithuanian Christian Democrats	42.0
Hungary	08 04 2018	Movement for a Better Hungary	41.8
Czech Republic	21 10 2017	Civic Democratic Party	41.7
Azerbaijan	05 11 2000	Azerbaijan Popular Front	41.6
Japan	14 12 2014	(Japan Innovation Party	41.2
Moldova	24 02 2019	Democratic Party of Moldova	40.9
Romania	11 12 2016	National Liberal Party	40.4
Austria	29 09 2019	Austrian Freedom Party	40.1
Cyprus	22 05 2016	Progressive Party of the Working People	40.0
Georgia	08 10 2016	United National Movement	39.5
Greece	25 01 2015	New Democracy	39.5
Canada	19 10 2015	Conservative Party of Canada	39.3
Sweden	09 09 2018	Sweden Democrats	39.2
Montenegro	30 08 2020	For the Future of Montenegro	39.2
Czech Republic	21 10 2017	Freedom and Direct Democracy	38.1
South Korea	15 04 2020	United Future Party - including Future Korea Party	37.8
Switzerland	20 10 2019	Social Democratic Party of Switzerland	37.3
Estonia	03 03 2019	Conservative People's Party of Estonia	37.1
Belgium	26 05 2019	Flemish Interest	37.1
Latvia	06 10 2018	Social Democartic Party Harmony	36.9
Germany	26 09 2021	Alternative for Germany	36.8
France	11 06 2017	The Republicans	36.7
Australia	02 07 2016	Liberal Party of Australia	36.3
United States	03 11 2020	Republican Party	36.0
Switzerland	20 10 2019	Swiss People’s Party	35.0
Italy	04 03 2018	League	34.9
Russia	04 12 2011	Liberal Democratic Party of Russia	34.6
Latvia	06 10 2018	National Alliance ‘All For Latvia!' – ‘For Fatherland and Freedom - Latvian National Independence Movement'	34.6
Russia	04 12 2011	Communist Party ot the Russian Federation	33.9
Greece	20 09 2015	New Democracy	33.5
Montenegro	30 08 2020	Peace is our Nation	33.2
Italy	04 03 2018	Go Italy	31.8
Russia	04 12 2011	United Russia	29.1
Latvia	06 10 2018	New Conservative Party	28.7
Serbia	21 06 2020	Ivica Dačić – Socialist Party of Serbia, United Serbia – Dragan Markovic Palma	28.0
Brazil	07 10 2018	Brazil above everything, God above everyone	27.4
Spain	10 11 2019	Voice	26.7
Slovakia	05 03 2016	Direction-Social Democracy	25.4
Latvia	06 10 2018	Who owns the state?	25.1
Netherlands	15 03 2017	Party of Freedom	23.1
Israel	02 03 2020	The Consolidation	18.2
Iceland	28 10 2017	Centre Party	18.2
Hungary	08 04 2018	Alliance of Federation of Young Democrats - Christian Democratic People's Party	17.1