Quote Originally Posted by Cybel View Post
Also disagree. I've met enough exceptions of many extremely individualistic 1D Ne people to say that's dumb. SLI girl I know hangs with all kinds of freaks and outcasts, doesn't want to get married in the future and have kids. I'm similar in that aspect. SEI girl decided to explore her unconventional sexuality despite going against all her friends and family, happily married to her asexual homoromantic lover now. I don't know any Ne PoLRs IRL tbh but ESI and LSI strike me as quite capable of going against the grain for their noble beliefs and truths of their ideal world. I'm sorry but you might just be hanging with boring people.

1D Ne is more like a lack of deep confidence when it comes to actualization, even if their self esteem in general is pretty good. They are typically born with special sensor skills used in in-optimal circumstances. Unsharpened blade.
Well, Si bases are capable of it. It seems like esp. ESI (unless some fundamental problems) are not well receptive to live outside of material means (I have even made one really argumentative when I said my material future is very little interest of mine). Hence I do not see this sort of number about dimension really relevant towards the topic question seems to aim for and it does generate confusion. We need remember that dimension is like allowed plausible states if we just state the word dimension. So it can be plenty experimental in its confinement. What this means in socionics? Well, first hand nothing more.