So 1D Nes have trouble with this. But so do most people you know. You’ve broadened the experimental group to a point it starts to lose its meaning. Some years ago a job that put me through college was part-time helping m.d.s with their reseach papers. Months later I could talk on and on about gestational issues integrated from semantically-charged specialized books. I bring this up because of the link you provided. Exposure plays a role. Holding a piece of information contained in a term enough for sustainability (the way you want to present the appearance of Ne in the link) falls under working memory and I could make a case for that being Te-related. (And not to pick on you, you mistook end-result Si with source-Si. I’ve just remembered that now that you mention grasping the essence of things).



Reply With Quote