im not familiar with BLM riot or incitements on them. But I do believe it is within the companies’ right in general to cancel those kinds of people. Plus - and I don’t necessarily like this but it just is - this was “bigger” or more attention grabbing due to being a Capitol riot and the protestors were encouraged by the President. That may be why you see a bigger action taken here maybe
I think “free speech” is fine but when it’s literally resulting in violence, an action has to be taken
plus this was an attack on the government itself, incited by the president, so it makes sense more urgent actions are taken for it.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.the...rticle/617614/
im not trying to downplay and incitement’s of violence by anybody else in the congress but just that I don’t think Twitter or any other tech companies really did anything wrong by “cancelling” him.
Originally Posted by asd
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote