.
.
Last edited by persimmonism; 07-22-2021 at 08:24 PM.
Masochism is objectively good, because there's infinite pain but finite pleasure in the world.
Tears and hysterics are my dessert
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I frankly don't get how it looks sado-masochistic, to me it's innocent fuckin around lol
What kind of emotional sadism have you had in mind though, this interests me.
Like, can you elaborate what (emotional) things you do/can do to "subtly hurt someone" as an IEI and esp why or how, when it's like "they're being too nice" / "too permissive" to you. I'd be interested in examples or like you described it about the Ni manipulations, that was a very good and informative post too.
These basically sound like shit-tests.
theoretically and from what Ive seen realistically most SLEs seem type 8 and they won't stand for disrespect, would shut you down as soon as they pick up on it.
How I respond to this however seems to mislead people as there is a discrepancy between what I think, what I feel and how I respond to ppl. If I know you well and am comfortable with you I'll easily pick up on this even if it's subtle and bluntly put you in your place. IF you are new and I haven't figured you out yet I'll maintain a friendly and forgiving facade while trying to make sense of you, then make decisions based on the metal model I develop of you. I say its misleading, because I give off the wrong impression and ppl think they can get away with more than I'm actually going to allow them to.. and how I react will eventually completely blindside them. I need to work on not being so friendly from the onset tbh.. harmonizning smh.
Idk if there is any sadomasochistic tendencies in this, to be fair I'm not the most tolerant person even if I give off the impression of being one.
I like both, switching back and forth between sadism and masochism is really an intense experience. I love extreme sense experience; mixing pain and pleasure.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
This is traumatized beta shit.
I'm going to be 100% honest rn. I was thinking about this, I don't know why, but I like it. When someone talks to me with a mean nickname but it's done lovingly it makes me melt. When someone grabs me and hits me I feel something strange like it's a warm hug. I like to feel pain during sex, it makes me feel something so intense but I can't really explain it.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".