DCNH Socionics Dual Subtype
Hello All! I am still reading up on more of the DCNH at the moment to get the full effect and while reading up on it more, I stumbled across this blog: https://varlawend.blogspot.com/2020/...-subtypes.html
They talk about the pairings and a possible dual for each one. I think it is really interesting even though they don't go into much detail. I thought I would post it for discussion. Plus maybe more DCNH discussion too.
Those are pretty common irl. People feel them instinctively. Check out John Lennon (C) and Yoko Ono (H). Or Donald Trump (D) and Melania (N). There are many more.Originally Posted by MissDucki
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I didn't know there was also a secondary for each person. How does that differ from the primary?
Chronic "grass is always greener" syndrome
Supposedly the author states that The primary DCNH is Far-Distance/Goal Subtype, Secondary - Close-Distance/Implementation Subtype. That I will get back to you cause I need to make sure that I understand it for myself and go over it more. I am guessing at this moment that the first is how one approaches goals at a far distance and the secondary how the implement the close distance of reaching these goals or obstacles.
That's pretty much how I understood it, I only thought of it more with close or distant relationship, lol.
I think it makes sense when people have two different ones, also can explain why some people appear as one but see themselves as another, i.e. focus is put on opposite distance setting.
usage of baseless hypotheses as subtypes will lead you to mistakes with good chance
and subtypes is not Socionics
I always thought that socionics could benefit from more complexity.
Reply With Quote
