Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: What is your attachment style?

  1. #1
    Ania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    TIM
    EII-0
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Exclamation What is your attachment style?

    Take this survey to contribute to research on attachment styles and personality disorders! You will get a brief indication of your attachment style at the end of the survey. The survey should take about 40 minutes to an hour to complete. Your responses are all anonymous.

    https://uttyler.az1.qualtrics.com/jf...UYKO1FjAtJEUQd
    Last edited by Ania; 09-23-2020 at 02:19 PM.

  2. #2
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,413
    Mentioned
    631 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Secure
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  3. #3
    ragnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    649
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Test presupposes the existence of a "romantic partner".
    Greetings, ragnar
    ILI knowledge-seeker

  4. #4
    Ania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    TIM
    EII-0
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ragnar View Post
    Test presupposes the existence of a "romantic partner".
    If you don't, you are asked to imagine how you would behave if you had one.
    EII-C | INFP | 4(w5)96 sx/so

  5. #5
    ragnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    649
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psych View Post
    If you don't, you are asked to imagine how you would behave if you had one.
    I found many of the questions ambiguous like there wasn't really a unique "correct" answer among the alternatives. Also, I'm not sure how well my imagination works. This is what I got, the description seems to fit:

    Your RQ Score was B. I am uncomfortable getting close to others. I want emotionally close relationships, but I find it difficult to trust others completely, or to depend on them. I worry that I will be hurt if I allow myself to become too close to others.

    A score of A suggests Secure Attachment in romantic relationships, meaning you tend to be comfortable in close relationships.

    A score of B suggests Fearful Attachment, meaning you want close relationships, but are uncomfortable in them and fear being hurt.

    A score of C suggests Preocccupied Attachment, meaning you want close relationships, but feel like others don't want to be as close to you, or value you as much as you do them.

    A score of D suggests Dismissive Attachment, meaning you tend to be comfortable without close relationships, preferring to be independent, and also not have others depend on you.
    Greetings, ragnar
    ILI knowledge-seeker

  6. #6
    Ania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    TIM
    EII-0
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ragnar View Post
    I found many of the questions ambiguous like there wasn't really a unique "correct" answer among the alternatives. Also, I'm not sure how well my imagination works. This is what I got, the description seems to fit:
    some measures are relatively new, some have been researched well and normed, so yeah that is something we have to work with. I can’t alter their wording.
    im glad the RQ worked for you though.
    EII-C | INFP | 4(w5)96 sx/so

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •