Hi

[Lolita]

I’m new to the forum, not to socionics.

[Lolita]

LOL it’s literal. I did snatch some weaves... Although the figurative meaning also applies.

[Sol]

not new in socionics from California
interesting

in case will want to get opinions about your type - good to give a video

[Lolita]

not new in socionics from California
interesting

in case will want to get opinions about your type - good to give a video

“Not new” as in familiar. I’ve been typed by WSS as SLE.
https://youtu.be/pf02j7uRydE

[Lolita]

You have glasses, how is sol supposed to read ya, man?

I was outdoors and it was sunny... sigh I don’t think I “look” like SLE. VI is a stupid Fi Delta thing with no logical basis behind it whatsoever.

[Northstar]

I was outdoors and it was sunny... sigh I don’t think I “look” like SLE. VI is a stupid Fi Delta thing with no logical basis behind it whatsoever.

I don't agree with the stupid Fi Delta thing (although I considered VI bullshit as well when I got into socionics, but I've warmed up to it a lot)
FWIW I thought your pic looked like I'd expect an female SLE to look like even without seeing the eyes.

[Lolita]

I don't agree with the stupid Fi Delta thing (although I considered VI bullshit as well when I got into socionics, but I've warmed up to it a lot)
FWIW I thought your pic looked like I'd expect an female SLE to look like even without seeing the eyes.

Yikes lol not sure if that’s a good or bad thing. I think I look and feel candyass. Crazy Fi VI system might work if the type is already determined, but there’s no explicit rules with VI when used to type an unknown. I like explicit rules and elusive stuff just pisses me off. There’s no parameters to work with... so I find it defeating.