Logic and probability have nothing to do with being a loser. This was literally lol worthy. Use Socionics to determine where your dual will most likely hang out. Se in your vital track? Join a sport/gym. Fe in vital? Go to a social gathering. Te? Go to H&R block and hit on the taxes person. As Jung would implore, too much of any 1 element is bad.
I mean, the math is the same, just the distribution would change, and the number of people you would need to talk to would fall drastically. So I agree with your point.Originally Posted by cactagon
I also dont know what do you mean by "being a loser", if you could explain I would appreciate.
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
The Cambridge English dictionary defines a loser as "a person or company that is at a disadvantage because of their particular situation," and in this instance, it would be the author's failure to understand that rather than using logic to compute a probability on finding their dual human, they should take action and go outside. The "numbers about finding a dual," don't tell you that the math is indeterminable since human behavior is unpredictable. I literally copulate with my dual ALL the time. I don't need to meet 900 or 250 people. It's very easy when you put the book on mechanics away, and embrace organic relations is what I was trying to say but came off a lil terse cuz its like dude cmon
Last edited by cactagon; 08-26-2020 at 10:25 PM. Reason: put not but
I don't see much substance in your post. You're implying I'm at disadvantage even when you know nothing about me. LOL
Who told you I haven't found duals IRL?
Who told you I'm not taking action?
Also
It's just a simple math. I mean, this logic is pretty simple and it took me less than a minute to get to these results. I didn't do anyone any harm. Rather you should learn to interpret numbers and see beyond what these simple numbers are telling, which you probably can't because you are too worried about teaching others. Alright go have fun, and don't waste time trying to teach losers LOL . I mean, do you really care about me?
Have a nice day, stranger.
Last edited by BrainlessSquid; 08-27-2020 at 12:29 AM.
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
I don't need to "know" you to understand that your overuse of logic is what creates your disadvantage in finding your dual. No element is greater than another. I never stated what your questions are asking me. It's funny that you write "you should learn to interpret numbers and see beyond what these simple numbers are telling," since my point in commenting was to help you understand computing a probability of finding your dual isn't as easy as you think it is, despite all your awesomely perfect logic. Do I care about you? Inasmuch as you're another human being, for sure. Add to your presumed human quality your knowledge of typology and your presence here on this forum (this abstract tangible connection we share) of course I do! I love everyone, until I get to "know" them. Then a bifurcation occurs: to love or not to love?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote