Why not make a VI bot?(Ai)
why haven't we made an Ai-bot that does VI?
@COVID 007 you think its possible to make a machine that recognizes socionic type patterns in a video with constrained format? We establish the requirement for the video, make the bot, teach it to recognize types?
Typing would be a breeze hehe.. I should make a website that does this for $.
You need lots and lots of (validly) typed sample faces. And where are you gonna get those?
The list I made is a good source for reliably typed famous people: https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ple-Types-List
Originally Posted by nice
Another possible sources are photos and videos of forum members who are sure about their type and others agree with it, Filatova portraits and other examples of people typed by Russian socionists, typings on socioforum etc.
It's possibly to do an approximation. To do this for videos and nonverbal behavior there it's harder than for a comparision of photos with static face traits. Also algorithms for nonverbal comparision are not clear for typing, as those use the intuition. And today personal computers should be slow, except to use a large network of them.
Also there is a problem to have correct types examples. This can be improved to some degree by a match of several methods. Also a computer may find common traits in the whole material and such mb to improve the typing, if to suppose that the correct type has the most presence compared to all other types in the material.
Among available at now and some related are image search engines as yandex. This may help to notice people having similar types. As to notice a similarity between people having more common traits is easier, so this makes easier to notice ones which have not only similar faces but also similar types. Also the algorithms which analyse general similarity of images, but take into account facial expressions to some degree.
What's the purpose of SEI?
You only need a few million or more confirmed typings for the AI. Then typing will be a breeze.
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
Duality is reality. Socionics is not
We already have one: Kill4Me.
People aren't very satisfied with the results though