C-EII-INFj 4w3 Sx/sp 479
I'm sx-first and I've been told I'm a "loose cannon" by an introverted project manager at a university, and I've been told that I'm un-igorable by an SEI that I work with.
These are just the things that people have told me, or came back to me by way of a third party. I don't know what people are actually thinking about me. I probably don't want to know.
I don't have any feedback about my desire to merge with a woman I like upon first seeing her that day. Some women like the clarity, some don't.
I assume they are thinking, "He wants to fuck me, but then we can go shopping and then to the beach." But I don't really know.
I'll let you know when I understand what SX is supposed to be. I've heard it described as both 'sexual' and 'intimate;' terms which are used in ways that are mutually exclusive.
edit. I stopped using real humans in my avatrs to discourage ppl from thinking anything I do has sexual connotations.
Last edited by Tommy; 07-04-2020 at 10:14 PM.
Too much. Entirely too much. But occasionally really sexy.
Sx firsts are intense and cool and potentially intimate. (This is idealizing and forgetting the first instinct may be about covering for a weak area--I don't have experience but imagine they may do that push-pull thing which is about avoiding intimacy. It's fun I think for the one doing the push/pull more than for the one being pushed and pulled).
reckless, toying, hungry
crash and burn
- figure sx-first's sexual orientation to be all things, every thing.
- "what makes you tick" questions are posed too early on for comfort. invasive.
- that sx require the low to ascend the high could be viewed as wasteful of energy and resources. parasitic.