Hi, new here. Currently trying to transition from MBTI to Socionics.
Hello
Hi, new here. Currently trying to transition from MBTI to Socionics.
read Jung and that book
https://www.amazon.com/Understanding.../dp/0967990769
I think you know the answer
Helps be distracted on external from inner darkness of the mistake in own type as IEE.Originally Posted by ashlesha
His avatar with "Clint Eastwood" points on possible beta.
If you seriously think categorization of traits this coincidental (where they can be determined by a myriad other interferences to cognition, which Socionics is a metric of), I'm not sure you should be doing typology in the first place.
Last edited by Exegesis; 07-06-2020 at 06:14 PM.
To type "seriously" I prefer to have a video, at least.
There is the art taste to violence and weird "dark" aesthetics, what is more met among Se valued types. Socionics descriptions of 8 functions is better than in MBTI and Jung sources what made harder for you to notice this and understand my doubts.
Then. The man on the avatar has close art style to that pic. Expresses feelings of hate and suspicion what fits to violence interest. And also by facial expression reminds that LSI actor.
What I've pointed are significant factors to doubt in IEE. There are often mistakes in types.
While you, being a very noob, take your opinion about types too seriously to disagree with me.
Read the recommended at least, check _successfully_ your type by IR effects with people IRL to understand the minimum about types and typing methods. Then you'll have something meaningful to be sure in your opinion how to type people.
As you seems to oppose to take into account contradictions with basic theory, talk from the start about Ti related categorizations, show to be touchy when people doubt in types which other ones think about themselves, have muddy for base Te type talking - so the possiblity of your mistake in own type as LIE is significant.
The main in Socionics is IR (intertype relations). In case you mistake in own type, your "transition" have higher chance to lead you to inappropriate IR theory usage and such choosing too problematic (from types side) people for you.
I strongly recommend you to make a typing thread with your video. At least, to doubt in own type until its positive IR checking.
wbr
Last edited by Sol; 07-06-2020 at 07:08 PM.
This isn't a matter of opinion, it's a matter of methodology. Intertype theory is an essential part of Socionics, on this I agree, but if you're deducing them through methods like VI, the chances of typings being skewed by confirmation bias is increased expontentially. The method is Model A and its application.
@ashlesha
Truth and reason prevail!
* has updated the text above to be more clear for noobs
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote